12+ Reasons to Donate to ClusterFree

Why cluster headache mitigation should become your #1 effective giving priority this Season: impactful, novel, very alive, and with plausible fast results!

By Andrés Gómez Emilsson, ClusterFree Co-Founder & Member of Advisory Board

TL;DR: To motivate action and feel genuine internal alignment around a decision, sometimes we need to see it from many different angles. Even when a single reason should be enough, we need to motivate our entire internal coalition of subagents! Hence, all of these reasons to support ClusterFree in its mission:

Summary of the 12+ Reasons to Support This Cause

  1. Watch real people rapidly improveVideo testimonials of torture stopping in minutes
  2. Logarithmic scale of impact – Helping someone with this condition is potentially one of the highest-leverage interventions anyone can do as a gift to someone’s life
  3. Insurance against illegible suffering – Building a world that takes invisible pain seriously, including your own in the future! (crossing fingers you never experience such things!)
  4. Proof-of-concept for valence-first cost-effectiveness – This illustrates the corner cases where QALYs/DALYs fail catastrophically
  5. Intellectual coalition – Scott Alexander, Peter Singer, Anders Sandberg, Robin Carhart-Harris, etc. have seen the evidence and are convinced this is real
  6. Schelling point for suffering reduction – Network effects for future high-impact work, attracting genuine talent to focus on deep suffering reduction is its own value proposition
  7. It’s a strike against medical paternalism – Informed consent for known therapies, even when not officially approved, when it comes to extreme suffering, should always be an option on the table
  8. Actually tractable – Success looks like a 3-5 year timeline with a clear theory of change
  9. Speed cashes out in suffering prevented – 70,000 people in extreme agony right now, every day of delay matters greatly
  10. Works as an accelerant for an existing movement – Adding coordination to grassroots momentum that’s already underway (giving the psychedelic renaissance wings!)
  11. Psychospiritual merit (if you believe in “karma”) – Buddhist texts specifically highlight headache relief, “immeasurable merit” in store for you and your loved ones if you decide to help with clean intentions
  12. Bodhisattva vision – Practice looking into darkness without flinching
  13. Bonus – I’ll stop talking about Cluster Headaches in Qualia Computing!: Fund it so I can get back to core QRI research

Introduction: Why Multiple Reasons Actually Matter

In principle, deciding where to donate should be straightforward: calculate expected value, fund the highest-impact opportunity, done. In practice, we’re coalitions of subagents with different reward architectures, time horizons, epistemics, and thresholds for action.

At a neurobiological level, motivation doesn’t work the way we pretend. It’s not about “willpower” or “being convinced by good arguments.” Different brain regions make “bids” to the basal ganglia, using dopamine as the currency. Whichever region makes the highest bid gets to determine the next action. Scott Alexander explains this in Toward A Bayesian Theory Of Willpower (2021). What we call “motivation”, within this framework, is just whichever subsystem’s bid is currently winning. Whether the details are right or not, I think this tracks how I see people behave.

If you want to trigger high-effort action, giving just one reason may not be enough. That only raises one bid. Layer multiple kinds of reasons (emotional, moral, social, self-interest, narrative, identity-based), and you multiply the bidders in your internal parliament. Scott uses stimulants as an example: they “increase dopamine in the frontal cortex… This makes… conscious processes telling you to (e.g.) do your homework… artificially… more convincing… so you do your homework.”

Look, I’m being straightforwardly manipulative here. Giving you twelve reasons instead of one is designed to activate more of your subagents. But it’s prosocially manipulative – to help you integrate a truth you might already intellectually accept but haven’t acted upon yet. The bullet point approach can be misused when it obfuscates (think laundry list of complaints when there’s really just one big issue), so let me be meta-transparent: I genuinely believe ClusterFree is extremely high-impact, and I’m deliberately structuring this to get past your action threshold. If any one or even several of these reasons feel less convincing to you, ignore them. The robust core case stands on its own.

There’s also the threshold problem. In Guyenet On Motivation (2018), Scott discusses how higher dopamine makes the brain more likely to initiate any behavior. When dopamine is low, even strong reasons may not overcome inertia. Increased dopamine “makes the basal ganglia more sensitive to incoming bids, lowering the threshold for activating movements.” Sometimes what’s needed isn’t better arguments but enough energetic activation to allow any reason at all to push action over the threshold. Which is why you should read this while high on LSD and/or Adderall fully rested and energized.

Naturally, this connects to annealing. At QRI, we think of belief updating as requiring an energetic process. It’s not enough to know something matters; you need metabolic resources to actually integrate that knowledge and reconfigure your behavior accordingly. The REBUS (RElaxed Beliefs Under pSychedelics) framework applies here: people intellectually understand that cluster headaches are astronomically bad, that preventing them is extraordinarily high-leverage, and that this is one of the most intense forms of suffering you can and should urgently address. Yet this knowledge may remain compartmentalized and inert, unable to meaningfully shape action, resembling other “ongoing moral catastrophes” by which future generations may judge our society.

What breaks through? Multiple simultaneous channels of evidence that together cross energy thresholds. Emotional resonance. Social proof. Narrative coherence. Personal connection. These aren’t redundant: they join together as a gestalt that pushes forward the energetic budget needed for actual system-wide updating.

So here are the twelve reasons to support ClusterFree. Not because you need all twelve to “get it” intellectually, but because different reasons will activate different coalitions in your brain.

And if you’re not in a position to donate but still want to help – please keep reading. There are many high-impact ways to contribute at the end!


1. You Can Actually See People Rapidly Improving

Most charity is abstract. You send money into a statistical void and trust the meta-analyses.

With ClusterFree, you can watch video testimonials of actual people describing how psilocybin or DMT stopped “the worst pain imaginable” in minutes. The person who was screaming, punching walls, and contemplating suicide is suddenly calm, coherent, and alive again.

Watching someone’s face change like that hits you differently than reading a cost-effectiveness analysis. Your brain gets direct evidence of the state change. You see the suffering stop.

And strategically, patient testimonials are how this actually works. Raw video testimonials of “this stopped my torture” create demand that no institutional gatekeeping can fully suppress. People are already using this in advocacy. We’re just collecting the stories systematically and making them impossible to ignore. One major medical center sees enough of these, runs a supervised protocol, publishes clean results, and every other institution’s liability calculation flips.


2. On the Logarithmic Scale of Helping Another Human, This Is Unfathomably High

Preventing cluster headaches for life is plausibly one of the single largest “good deeds” a human can do for another human being. Yes, this is grandiose. But if something big IS true and you know it, pretending it’s not to avoid looking grandiose is fake humility that damages the cause.

Cluster headaches are called “suicide headaches” because the pain is so extreme that people actively contemplate ending their lives during attacks. Patients report “drilling through my eye socket,” “being stabbed in the brain,” “pain so bad I can’t think, can’t speak, can’t do anything but scream.”

Here’s a rough intuitive sketch of what the logarithmic scale of helping another person might look like (this isn’t rigorous math – it’s an illustration of what’s likely the case, directionally right[1]):

  • 10^0: holding a door open
  • 10^1: gifting a pen
  • 10^2: introducing them to someone useful
  • 10^3: helping them move places
  • 10^4: catching a major work or family mistake before it ruins their week
  • 10^5: teaching them a compounding skill (meditation, programming, emotional regulation)
  • 10^6: funding their higher education, changing their entire socioeconomic trajectory
  • 10^7: helping them escape a pathological family system
  • 10^8: preventing them from falling into a cult, deep addiction, or abusive relationship
  • 10^9: curing a chronic condition like treatment-resistant generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)
  • 10^10: saving their life while preserving psychological integrity
  • 10^11: giving them a permanent upward shift in baseline wellbeing and quality of consciousness, such as advanced contemplative practice can do over the course of decades
  • 10^12: preventing cluster headaches for life

Why 10^12? A single cluster headache attack is plausibly in the 10^9 to 10^11 range of negative valence – orders of magnitude worse than migraine, worse than childbirth, worse than even torture. A typical patient experiences thousands of these across their lifetime. The multiplication is straightforward.

We’ve done empirical work quantifying cluster headache intensity using patient self-reports, cross-condition comparisons, suicide attempt rates, and other methods. Full details in our EA Forum posts (Quantifying the Global Burden of Extreme Pain from Cluster Headaches, Logarithmic Scales of Pleasure and Pain) and our Nature: HSSC paper.

The theory of change for the open letters on ClusterFree is straightforward:

Patient testimonials – Raw evidence that DMT/psilocybin (even at subhallucinogenic doses) works for a large fraction of sufferers, spreading organically through desperate communities. This is already happening underground.

Reputation-Amplified Legitimization – Get enough credible voices (clinicians, researchers, policy experts) publicly acknowledging both the crisis and the evidence. We already have 800+ signatures, many from extremely prestigious people. This shifts what’s discussable. Journalists cover it differently. Clinicians stop whispering with fear of judgment and start preparing, even if quietly at first (I’m already seeing signs of this in some groups).

Clinical cascade – One major medical center runs a supervised protocol, publishes clean results, and every other institution’s liability math inverts. You don’t need consensus. You need one proof point, and the dominoes fall.


3. It’s Insurance Against Your Own Extreme Suffering Being Dismissed

Cluster headaches are invisible. No blood, no broken bones, nothing on medical imaging. Just someone screaming, rocking, punching walls while doctors tell them to “try reducing stress”, “have you considered yoga?”, or “maybe try an Ibuprofen?”.

This is what illegible suffering looks like. People don’t believe you. Institutions can’t help you. You’re trapped in a cage of agony that no one else can see.

Supporting work on illegible suffering means supporting the principle that intense subjective experience matters even when it can’t be measured easily. By supporting ClusterFree, you’re building the world where, if you ever wind up in incomprehensible pain (chronic illness, treatment-resistant conditions, novel syndromes medicine doesn’t understand yet, a hard-to-communicate and hard-to-alleviate pocket of deep biopsychosocial suffering), people will actually take it seriously. Where “I am in agony, and this helps” is treated as highly important data, the existence is safer and more dignified.

Medical, institutional, and social gatekeeping kills people. It traps them in years of unnecessary suffering because the safe and affordable tools that work aren’t “approved” yet. By supporting the patient-driven, evidence-based access to what actually helps, you’re contributing to practical moral betterment and making the world safer for everyone who might need it. Including you.


4. It’s a Proof-of-Concept for Valence-First Cost-Effectiveness

Most effective altruism uses QALYs (Quality-Adjusted Life Years) or DALYs (Disability-Adjusted Life Years) to evaluate interventions. These metrics have a major limitation: they systematically underweight extreme suffering. A QALY-based analysis of cluster headaches captures some utility loss but misses orders of magnitude of suffering because attacks are brief and non-lethal – even though they’re torture-level and recurring. The frequency distribution is also extremely skewed (some sufferers have 10+ attacks daily), which standard health economics frameworks struggle to properly account for.

ClusterFree evaluates interventions based on how bad things actually feel and what their actual prevalence is – not through the lens of reduced life expectancy or economic burden: “How much suffering are we preventing when measured by its actual intensity?”.

We’ve quantified cluster headache intensity and prevalence using patient self-reports, cross-condition comparisons, suicide attempt rates, and other complementary empirical methods. The result is clear: cluster headaches score astronomically high. This is why preventing them matters so much more than conventional metrics would suggest.

If you want a future where we optimize for the real reduction of suffering instead of metrics that structurally and systematically ignore its most intense forms, ClusterFree is the seed. We’re showing how you can make rigorous, evidence-based decisions by taking the actual experience seriously. This serves as a template for charity evaluation and ethical triage (not necessarily to replace current Effective Altruism methods, but to add a _critical_ missing evaluation angle to the ensemble model for how to help most effectively). 


5. You’ll Be in the Company of Intellectual Giants

Scott Alexander supports this. Anders Sandberg supports this. Peter Singer supports this. These are thought leaders with decades of track records in rigorous, scout-mindset thinking about doing good. They don’t endorse lightly. They’ve looked at the testimonials, the statistics and trends, the theory of change, and said: this is real.

If you trust their epistemics even a little, their endorsement is strong Bayesian evidence. These aren’t people chasing trends or optimizing for social approval.

And beyond the rationalist/EA sphere? Robin Carhart-Harris supports this – one of the leading psychedelic neuroscientists in the world. Shamil Chandaria supports this – doing serious work on meditation, predictive processing, and contemplative neuroscience. Christopher H. Gottschalk supports this – a neurologist who actually treats cluster headache patients and knows firsthand how devastating they are.

EA thinkers, psychedelic researchers, clinical neurologists, contemplative scientists – they’re all saying the same thing. That doesn’t happen often.

You get to join this coalition early. While it’s still underrecognized. While it requires actually engaging with the arguments instead of following the consensus. While supporting it means skin in the game.

Supporting ClusterFree now signals good taste (you can spot high-impact opportunities before they’re obvious), high reasoning capacity (you can evaluate complex arguments across disciplines), genuine compassion (you care about actual suffering, not just legible causes), and epistemic independence (you can disagree with the consensus when the evidence demands it).

When this becomes mainstream (and it will), you were there first.


6. It’s Creating a Schelling Point for Serious Suffering-Reduction Work

ClusterFree is reducing the coordination costs and bringing together people who can spot neglected pools of immense value early on.

Researchers who care about phenomenological intensity. Clinicians frustrated with institutional gatekeeping who want evidence-based psychedelic medicine. Policymakers who understand regulatory strategy. Patients with direct experience who want to help others. All working on the same thing with a clear theory of change.

Many causes tend to be either too vague (“reduce suffering”) or too narrow (“fund this one study”). ClusterFree hits the sweet spot – it is specific enough to be actionable, broad enough to matter at scale, and legible enough to attract serious supporters.

The network effects compound. When the next high-leverage suffering reduction project comes along, there’s already a group of competent people who know how to execute. The people showing up now will co-build what comes next. Rather than funding one project, you’re seeding a network that keeps generating high-impact work.


7. It’s a Strike Against Paternalistic Control Over Suffering Relief

Right now, people with cluster headaches are told they cannot officially access psilocybin or DMT – the interventions that consistently, rapidly, and reliably work for a large fraction of sufferers – because the institutions have decided they’re not allowed to make that informed choice. Even when they’re screaming in agony. Even when they’re suicidal. Even when nothing else helps.

Medical paternalism is at its most cruel when patients hear: “We know you’re suffering, but you can’t have the effective, affordable, and safe-to-manage thing that stops your agony, because we haven’t finished the proper studies yet, and/or because of the system’s inertia.” Never mind that converging evidence shows it works. Never mind that patients are already using it skilfully and reporting dramatic relief. Never mind that the risk profile is more than worth it given the suffering prevented.

ClusterFree, with your support, is building the legal, scientific, and social infrastructure to challenge that amoral status quo. We pave the way for informed consent, supervised access, and letting people make rational decisions about their own unbearable pain.

If you value bodily autonomy, participatory medicine, and the right to pursue relief from extreme suffering, this is the fight. And it’s winnable thanks to multiple predictors of success. 


8. This Is Actually Tractable

Most extreme suffering feels impossibly hard to address. Oftentimes, contemplating extreme suffering causes a sense of helplessness. It’s too big, too entrenched, and too complex. You can care deeply and still feel like there is nothing you can meaningfully do about it.

Cluster headaches are different. We have video testimonials. We have 800+ signatures from people with institutional power. We have a clear mechanism – psilocybin/DMT abort attacks rapidly and safely. We have willing clinicians ready to run supervised protocols. We have patient demand already creating the underground adoption.

The main barrier is coordination and legitimacy-building. That’s where ClusterFree steps in: we close the gap between common knowledge and the rollout of systemic solutions. 

And we’re going beyond mere advocacy. Bob Wold of ClusterBusters calls DMT a “breakthrough therapy” for its near-instant pain relief; we’re working to understand why it works, so we can foster next best steps. Our research includes exploring legal, non-hallucinogenic (or only mildly hallucinogenic) alternatives like 5-MeO-DALT, which one patient discovered in Shulgin’s TIHKAL and used to successfully treat 46 cluster headache patients. Developing targeted therapies based on understanding the mechanisms and testing new approaches translates into accessibility and effectiveness.

We (admittedly optimistically) believe this is doable within 3 to 5 years of focused and effective execution: build the coalition, get one major medical center to publish clean results, and watch the common knowledge cascade. Meanwhile, we’re already developing better treatments with maximally broad legal adoption.

Most things that matter this much take decades… or never even happen. This one is actually within reach.


9. Every Month of Delay Means Unnecessary Pits of Suffering

Right now, while you’re reading this, ~70,000 people are experiencing a cluster headache attack. More will start in the next few minutes. And more after that, like a global wave of agonizing pain.

Roughly 3 million people worldwide have cluster headaches in any given year. Many experience attacks daily or multiple times per week during the cluster periods. We estimate that globally, cluster headache patients spend approximately 70,670 person-years per year in pain, with about 8,570 person-years (about 3.1 million person-days) spent at extreme pain levels (≥9/10).

The math is brutal: with every month of delay, patients undergo millions of preventable torture-level attacks. While other cause areas and interventions may warrant dilemmas of donating now or later, the case of ClusterFree is urgently clear – donate now, and we will do our best at bringing unimaginable counterfactual relief to millions in 2026-2027. 

Our model is designed for speed – we are not waiting for perfect RCTs, commercial products, or stable institutional consensus. We are building the strategic legitimacy cascade that lets institutions act on what we already know.

The suffering is happening right now. The effective solution exists right now. We know how to connect the dots, and the only question is how fast we can do so.


10. ClusterFree Is Accelerating an Already Developing Movement

ClusterBusters has been doing heroic work for years, building community, sharing information, and giving people hope. The psychedelic renaissance has been shifting cultural and scientific attitudes. Various researchers and advocates have been pushing this forward through different channels.

ClusterFree adds a specific piece: demonstrating that this is a winnable fight right now.

We bring:

  • An explicit theory of change (testimonials lead to reputation-amplified legitimization, which leads to clinical cascade);
  • 800+ signatures from outstanding individuals, many with institutional power and cultural influence;
  • A straightforward narrative: “this is effective, safe, and urgent, and we can scale this legally” – and we’re not afraid to signal DMT as especially promising (due to its extremely fast pain relief profile when “vaped” at the onset of an attack);
  • Coordination infrastructure that connects patients, clinicians, researchers, and funders around a shared goal; and
  • A global but local-context-sensitive approach in both coverage and mindset: while ClusterBusters focuses on the U.S. and UK, we’re building parallel advocacy tracks across multiple jurisdictions (Canada, Europe, Latin America, etc.) to build the missing capacity.

This strategy acts synergistically with other approaches, de-risking them rather than obstructing them. When a major medical center decides to run a supervised protocol, they will do it in an environment where 800+ credible voices (as of December 13th 2025) have already confirmed that this is real, this matters, and the research must take place as soon as possible.

Our strategy is being developed and executed by uniquely talented individuals with a strong track record. Alfredo Parra leads the organization – he is exceptional at navigating the interface between institutions, has 7+ years of nonprofit management experience, and is provingly extremely conscientious and high-integrity (don’t take my word for it – look at all the work). The team and the community that seeded it concentrate people who simultaneously understand the importance of suffering reduction, psychedelic phenomenology, regulatory strategy, and movement building. They both care about the deep structure of consciousness and aren’t swayed by common narratives. This is a rare comparative advantage, and in our view, proves an excellent fit to push this cause forward.

The fruitful work has been happening already. Where we step in is providing leverage at a specific bottleneck: making the path to legitimacy visible and coordinated.


11. If You Take “Karma” Seriously, Look at What the Texts Say About Headache Relief

In the Bodhicaryāvatāra, Śāntideva teaches that “immeasurable merit” arises even from the simple thought: “Let me dispel the headaches of beings.” The tradition treats this literally. Not metaphorically. Relieving sharp, overwhelming pain generates outsized karmic effects because it interrupts some of the most intense forms of duḥkha in the human realm.

Why headaches specifically? Because they were considered the archetype of piercing, mind-breaking pain in the classical world. Cluster headaches exceed even that ancient benchmark. They represent some of the most unbearable moments a human mind can experience.

The logic of meritorious karmic logic is clear: if intention aligned with the relief of severe suffering produces merit that scales with the intensity of dukkha relieved, then work that prevents torture-level pain for thousands of people is not ordinary charity but a high-density, boutique, ultra-rare karmic investment.

For practitioners of the Bodhisattva path, karma constitutes a feedback loop shaping future clarity, opportunity, and awakening. Helping beings escape states of extreme pain is singled out across the Mahāyāna as one of the fastest ways to accumulate merit and purify obscurations.

If even contemplating the wish to relieve a single headache creates immeasurable merit, then actively supporting work that may end this class of suffering at scale plants karmic seeds that ripple across lifetimes.

Even if you hold a weak, naturalized version of karma (something like “intentions to help tend to produce good outcomes proportional to the good intended”), the efficiency here is absurdly high. Instead of helping someone have a slightly better day, you’re preventing thousands of hours of above-torture-level pain per person.

And what if you don’t believe in karma at all? The consequentialist case is still clear. You’re preventing, say, ~10^12 units of negative valence per person.


12. You Get the Bodhisattva-Tier Vision

Most people, when they look into the true darkness of suffering (the worst pain imaginable, sustained for hours, recurring for decades), recoil. They look away. They rationalize (“someone else will handle it”), they cope (“well, suffering is just part of life”), and freeze (“I can’t do anything about this anyway”).

Such reactions are understandable given the limits of our agency and the scope of the challenge. Luckily, there’s another response possible and available today:

You see it, and you roll up your sleeves. Where others flinch or cope, you take intentional action.

That capacity to clearly perceive the worst of what’s real and respond with competence, care, direction, and focus – rather than despair, avoidance, denial, or freezing – is a rare gem. It separates people who talk about compassion from people who enact it. The “Bodhisattva move” is: “I see the suffering. I will not turn away. I will do what needs to be done.”

Supporting ClusterFree strengthens that moral muscle. It’s a practice for the kind of person you may want to be: someone who can look into the darkest abyss and respond with pragmatism, not platitudes.


And a bonus reason for Qualia Computing readers…

So I Can Stop Talking About Cluster Headaches in Qualia Computing

Look, I very deeply care about this work, and this is why ClusterFree needs to claim its own space. QRI has a complementary mission to fulfill – studying and utilizing coupling kernels, topological approaches to the boundary problem, neural annealing frameworks, and the deep structure of valence.

The more ClusterFree is funded and self-sufficient, the more I can get back to the core theoretical work for which I’m best suited. Which, by the way, is exactly how we identify the next high-leverage suffering reduction opportunities!.

If you want me to shut up about cluster headaches and get back to talking for hours about beam-splitter holography and DMT phenomenology, the fastest way to make that happen is to generously fund ClusterFree.

You’re welcome.


What We’re Specifically Asking For

ClusterFree is currently a two-person operation: Alfredo leading the day-to-day execution (coalition building, clinical coordination, policy navigation, the 800+ signature campaign), and me providing strategic direction, research frameworks, writeups like this one, and QRI infrastructure. The initial donations will let us hire additional top talent to manage critical workstreams, so that we can:

  • Pursue parallel regulatory tracks in different jurisdictions;
  • Optimize our media presence by talking to journalists, podcasters, and medical journals;
  • Build global partnerships with patient organizations, headache centers, psychedelic advocacy groups, and retreat centers that treat this and related conditions;
  • Coordinate with medical centers willing to run supervised trials;
  • Create high-quality topical resources for patients in multiple languages, which are scarce and difficult to find; and
  • Pursue other high-impact value streams we’re ready to launch with additional capacity.

If significant funding is obtained, it will allow us to personally visit retreat centers and bring people with cluster headaches to suitable settings where they can experiment with these therapies, and where we can study them thanks to the QRI approaches to systematic phenomenology mapping, including EEG and biorhythms monitoring. This might turn out to be really important, possibly allowing us to determine what aspect of psilocybin/DMT relieves the pain. Our working assumption, based on many interviews with sufferers, is that DMT’s “body vibration” effect is key for its pain relief – if true, this is something we could significantly optimize by developing more targeted therapies.

While our network of volunteers is growing (see Slack below), having dedicated paid staff accelerates our efforts dramatically. The faster we move, the louder we say “no” to overlooked suffering.


Can’t Donate But Want to Help?

There are many high-impact ways to contribute beyond financial support:

  • Sign the open letter – Adding your name increases our legitimacy and helps shift the Overton window.
  • Share patient testimonials – If you have cluster headaches and have used psychedelics, your story can help build the evidence base. We believe that video testimonials from sufferers, in particular, are especially powerful. Recordings showing the moment itself where psilocybin/DMT relieves the suffering in real time might have the most emotional resonance overall.
  • Join our Slack – We list simple but high-impact volunteer tasks (translations, social media, research assistance, essay feedback, etc).
  • Connect us with key people – Do you know journalists, podcasters, clinicians, policy makers, or potential donors? Introductions are greatly appreciated!
  • Spread the word – Share this essay, talk about cluster headaches with the right mood, and become the relieving change you want to see and experience in the world.

Conclusion

With all these reasons in mind, ClusterFree satisfies the utilitarian, the virtue ethicist, the long-term strategist, the person who wants meaning, the person who values courage, the person who wants to accumulate spiritual merit, the person who wants to bring these therapies to the FDA approval status, the person who just wants to see real humans stop screaming in pain, and the one who embodies all these motivations simultaneously.

Donate to ClusterFree

Donate to QRI (the incubator organization that made this possible, and conducts more aligned efforts)

Sign the open letter

Our internal coalitions can agree that this matters, and we can actually do it. Thank you.


Acknowledgments: Many thanks to Marcin Kowrygo for his generous edits of the draft. Thanks to Chris Percy, Roberto Goizueta, Hunter Meyer, and, of course, Alfredo Parra for relevant discussions and suggestions for this write-up. Huge thanks to the ClustersBusters team for their incredible and ethically urgent work (and generosity with their time to help people in need, as well as accepting being interviewed in a pinch at Psychedelic Science 2025). Thanks to Jonathan Leighton (OPIS) for inspiration, aligned work, and fighting the good fight! Thanks to Jessica Khurana (and her team) for founding Eleusina Retreat – the world’s only retreat center focused on using psychedelics, legally, for treating extreme pain conditions. Thanks to Maggie Wassinge for her copious emotional support, love, and motivation to keep doing the real work, even when it feels hopeless at times (seriously, THANK YOU). And to the spirit of Anders Amelin (RIP), who is always with us, encouraging and motivating, giving us strength and intelligence. May he rest in peace, knowing we’re pursuing our ambitious suffering-reducing goals <3 And thanks to the entire QRI team, as well as the broader qualia community at large, for creating a container where these ideas can be freely explored with curiosity and without stigma. And finally, thanks to all of the donors of QRI and ClusterFree: we will do what we can to make you proud of supporting us. Metta!


[1] On the 10^12 estimate: This is admittedly a back-of-the-envelope calculation, but here’s the reasoning. A cluster headache patient might experience anywhere from 3,000 attacks (conservative, successful treatment) to 30,000+ attacks (severe chronic cases) over their lifetime. Using a conservative estimate of 3,000 attacks averaging ~60 minutes (3,600 seconds) each gives us ~10^7 seconds of extreme pain. Now for the intensity ladder. Holding a door open might prevent ~0.1 units of discomfort, using a pinprick as 1 unit. Kidney stones, already rated 10/10 on standard pain scales, are plausibly ~1,000× more intense than a pinprick (10^3). Each second of cluster headache pain appears to be ~10× worse than kidney stones (10^4 relative to our baseline). Multiply by 10^7 seconds, and we get 10^11 from pure hedonic intensity alone. Additionally, cluster headaches impose a constant inter-ictal burden (meaning, the suffering between attacks), including PTSD, anticipatory anxiety, and a profound sense of doom between attacks (see interview with Cluster Busters founders at 53:10-53:40). This could add a 2-5X multiplier, bringing us to ~10^12. For severe cases with 10× more attacks, the calculation easily reaches 10^13 or higher. The true value likely ranges between 10^7 (very mild cases with effective treatment) and 10^16 (severe chronic cases accounting for peak intensities and suffering between attacks). Even at the conservative end, preventing cluster headaches for life remains one of the highest-impact interventions accessible to individuals. Similar back-of-the-envelope calculations can be done to put in perspective each of the steps on the “logarithmic scale of help you can provide to someone”.


Scott Alexander in “Links For December 2024” (Dec 24 2025):

13: Alfredo Parra of Qualia Research Institute on cluster headaches. Cluster headaches are plausibly the most painful medical condition. If you ask a cluster patient to rate their pain, they’ll almost always say 10/10. Does that mean the headaches are twice as painful as a 5/10 condition? There are some philosophical reasons to expect pain to be logarithmic, so plausibly cluster headaches could be orders of magnitude more painful than the average condition. Once you internalize that possibility, it throws a wrench into normal QALY ratings and suggests that, even though cluster headaches are pretty rare, they might cause a substantial portion of the global burden of disease (or even a substantial portion of the suffering in the world). Some psychedelics, especially psilocybin and DMT, seem to treat cluster headaches very effectively, so the more you believe this reanalysis, the more interested you should be in figuring out how to turn these into an accessible therapy (see clusterbusters for more information on this aspect).

And more recently in “Open Thread 409” (Nov 24 2025):

2: Qualia Research Institute announces their spinoff effort ClusterFree. Cluster headaches (aka “suicide headaches”) are probably the most painful medical condition known to science, which makes them a natural priority for some utilitarians. They seem to be extremely treatable by psychedelics like psilocybin and DMT (including sub-hallucinogenic doses), so ClusterFree is working on getting governments to research this further and maybe get these drugs into the medical pipeline (cf. ketamine for depression). There’s an open letter here, and you can contact them here. The information for patients is at the bottom of this page.

Peter Singer in his recent piece “The Best Treatment for the Most Painful Medical Condition Is Illegal” (Dec 11 2025)

A recent article in Nature: Humanities and Social Science Communications found the funding provided in the United Kingdom for research on cluster headaches to be “orders of magnitude” less than that provided for multiple sclerosis, a condition that affects a similar number of people. The authors conclude that, given that we regard the provision of anesthesia for surgery to be essential, we should also recognize relief for extreme pain as essential. Finding ways to do so should warrant the highest funding priority.

A new initiative called Clusterfree has launched global open letters calling on governments to provide legal access to psychedelics for people with cluster headache. I have signed, and I hope that you will, too.

Extreme Psychedelia: Rough Visual Replication for Psychedelic + Disso High Dose Combo (Seizure ⚠️)

Warning: Very Strong! (⚠️seizure warning⚠️)

Note: This video was done by playing around with parameters of QRI’s Oscilleditor while listening to music and enjoying myself (and the somatic sensations the visuals generate!).

The video is an extremely rough attempt at mapping high-dose psychedelic + dissociative combo phenomenology. Those trips where you regret adding whatever drug you added, when it became “too much”.

Say you’re on ketamine and you take an unexpectedly strong hit of DMT. Or you’re on 2C-B and you get an unexpectedly concentrated DCK nasal spray. This happens to people on dance floor, guys. A qualiascope would see it from miles away.

Please go wild VJing the Oscilleditor yourself: https://qri.org/oscilleditor/ (see: Video Tutorial)

Don’t watch casually.

Music recommended.

Enjoy!

Special Thanks to Emil Hall, who introduced features like the planar wave and developed the kernel-shrinking factor as a function of proximity to edges/depth, which is key for many of these effects.

Metta!

Announcing ClusterFree: A cluster headache advocacy and research initiative (and how you can help)

[xposted in EA Forum]

Today we’re announcing a new cluster headache advocacy and research initiative: ClusterFree

Learn more about how you (and anyone) can help.

Our mission

ClusterFree’s mission is to help cluster headache patients globally access safe, effective pain relief treatments as soon as possible through advocacy and research.

Cluster headache (also known as ‘suicide headache’) is considered the most painful condition known to mankind. We believe it is one of the largest sources of preventable extreme suffering in humans today. Every year, about 3 million adults (and an unknown number of minors) suffer from this debilitating condition.

And yet, even in the EU, only 47% of the cluster headache population had unrestricted access to standard treatments (primarily oxygen and triptans) in 2019. Despite affecting a similar number of people as multiple sclerosis, global investment into cluster headache is minuscule.

At the same time, countless patients have reported previously unattainable relief using certain psychedelics, even at low doses. For example, psilocybin, LSD and 5-MeO-DALT can effectively prevent attacks, and N,N-DMT can abort attacks within seconds and also have some preventative effects. However, these life-saving treatments are inaccessible to the vast majority of patients.

We want to tackle these problems by:

  • Publishing open letters demanding that governments, regulatory bodies, and medical associations worldwide take action immediately, with a focus on easing restrictions around psychedelic use.
  • Providing patient groups with high-quality resources and supporting their advocacy efforts.
  • Engaging with policymakers globally to advocate for better access to treatments.
  • Publishing research on cluster headache and supporting other researchers in the field.
  • Collaborating with entrepreneurs and philanthropists motivated to bring new, effective treatments to market.

About us

ClusterFree is a non-profit initiative incubated by the Qualia Research Institute.[1] It is led by Alfredo Parra, with Andrés Gómez Emilsson (President, QRI) as co-founder. Bob Wold (Director, Clusterbusters) and Jonathan Leighton (Executive Director, OPIS) are members of our Advisory Board.

We will be collaborating closely with Clusterbusters, the largest and most well-known cluster headache advocacy organization, led and run by patients. For about 25 years, they have been at the forefront of cluster headache advocacy, especially in the US and the UK. We are excited to bring more capacity and new approaches to tackle other jurisdictions, and to show that patients are not alone in this fight.

How you (and anyone) can help

As our first project, we are publishing one global open letter and 11 country-specific open letters:[2]

Anyone can sign the global open letter. Additionally, if you live in or come from one of the countries above, you can sign that letter as well. Signatories include Prof. Peter Singer, Scott Alexander, Dr. Christopher Gottschalk (Yale), David Pearce, and Dr. Daniel Ingram.

Please share the letters widely within your network![3]

If your organization wants to show its support for ClusterFree’s mission, we can list it as a partner on our website.

A few other ways to help include:

  • Donating or putting us in touch with potential donors. Donations are tax deductible in the US.
  • Volunteering for various tasks (many of which are very simple but high-impact).
  • Connecting us with journalists, podcasters, or influencers.
  • Offering any pro-bono services that could help the cause.
  • Giving us feedback on the website.
  • For patients: Sharing your testimonial (which we can feature here).

You can get in touch any time.

Room for funding

We have been making good progress on a shoestring budget during the past few months. Among others, we:

  • Started an official collaboration with Clusterbusters.
  • Gained the support of a member of a US state legislature.
  • Started conversations with CH advocates in multiple countries (most recently India[4], Denmark, and New Zealand).
  • Are engaging with entrepreneurs and philanthropists interested in bringing DMT to market.
  • Developed a preliminary idea for a new, legal abortive treatment that could be highly effective (potentially also for migraines).
  • Have started developing phenomenology-based, patient-centric surveys to test various hypothesis for the underlying mechanism of action that psychedelics exert on this condition.

We recently raised seed funding from a private donor to cover our core operations for the coming months. Additional funding would allow us to hire a second teammate to work alongside Alfredo at this early stage, particularly on outreach and communications. We could absorb an additional $50k–$150k immediately.

At this very early stage, we are still evaluating different paths to impact, and will likely test various strategies simultaneously to identify the most promising opportunities.

We believe ClusterFree is a great donation opportunity for people who care about relieving the most intense human suffering today. Cluster headaches represent a major health crisis even in developing countries, and we are far from having effective treatments widely available. Help us change that.

Donate

Additionally, you can consider donating to Clusterbusters or OPIS, who have been at the forefront of cluster headache advocacy and research for years.

Work with us

If you’d like to help us reduce the global burden of cluster headache pain (beyond volunteering), we’d love to hear from you. Simply fill out our expression of interest form.

Further information


  1. We are considering incorporating a charity in the UK. In the meantime, ClusterFree is fiscally sponsored by QRI.
  2. We are very grateful to the various volunteers from the EA community who contributed to the translations.
  3. Asking people individually to sign the letters works much better than asking in groups.
  4. Many thanks to Jacob Woessner’s volunteering work on this front.
  5. Website and brand design by Lombaert Studio.

[Many thanks to Alfredo Parra for this writuep]

QRI Presents: Reverse Engineering DMT Phenomenology with Non-Linear Optics

This is more than a presentation. It’s an invitation to join the frontier of consciousness research 🙂

Spatiotemporal Coordinates: Thursday, November 20 – 4:00 PM – 10:00 PM PST – Frontier Tower (San Francisco, California)

Hello Qualia Community!

After a year of heads-down development (with glimpses shared on podcasts including Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal #1  #2) QRI is ready to reveal the full scope of our work mapping the state-space of consciousness, modeling phenomenology, and identifying the computational properties of consciousness. 

What We’ve Recently Accomplished In This Area:

​In 2023, QRI’s High Energy Awareness Research Team conducted two legal psychedelic retreats exploring mushroomsayahuasca and 5-MeO-DMT, by bringing together an interdisciplinary coalition ​of meditators, psychonauts, physicists, and mathematicians and working as a Think Tank for weeks at a time (see heart.qri.org).

Systematic DMT phenomenology reveals repeatable phase transitions and geometric transformations, including hyperbolic curvature, symmetrification effects, and computational properties that demand explanation. The QRI period 2024-2025 has been about developing conceptual frameworks and computational models to make sense of these patterns, and then putting them to empirical test. We’ve discovered how coupling kernels (the rules of interaction between oscillating systems) can simultaneously shape both neural activity and the topological structure of physical fields, providing a potential causal chain from neurochemistry to the structure of conscious experience. It’s a conceptual framework where the pieces of the puzzle finally seem to fit together: how psychedelics modify coupling dynamics at the neural level, how these changes cascade through neural architectures to modulate field topology, and how this field structure feeds back into neural activity, avoiding the trap of epiphenomenalism while grounding phenomenology in processes with computationally meaningful properties.

What’s Next:

​This event is divided into two parts.

  • We’ll present the core outputs of our research from the past year: methods, participants, results, and the theoretical frameworks we’ve developed. You’ll see interactive demonstrations and simulations that bring these concepts to life.​
    • 4:00 PM – Doors open, mingling with snacks and soft drinks​
    • 5:00-5:40 – Introductions and interactive demonstrations​
    • 5:40-6:40 – The Big Reveal: QRI’s psychedelic research over the last two years, including HEART retreat resultsinteractive simulations, and our theoretical breakthroughs
  • We’ll chart our path forward: In Q2 2026, we’re planning a legal psychedelic retreat where mathematicians, physicists, meditators, and visual artists will collaborate to test whether non-linear optics plays a role in psychedelic phenomenology (especially DMT). This generative framework, which we take seriously and can rigorously test with proper funding, will combine physics simulations, psychophysics studies, and rigorous phenomenological mapping to reverse engineer the medium of computation of consciousness itself.​
    • 7:00-8:00 – The Next Chapter: 2026 retreat plans, mathematical modeling of consciousness, and testing our generative frameworks​
    • 8:00-9:00 – Q&A and group discussions​
    • 9:00-10:00 – Mingling and winding down

We anticipate that once we recognize consciousness’s computational role, we will move from cognitive science to consciousness engineering: systematically exploring the state-space of possible experiences and recruiting new qualia varieties to enhance our (conscious) cognitive capabilities.

Presenters at this event:

Andrés Gómez-Emilsson: As QRI’s President and Director of Research, his work at QRI ranges from algorithm design, to psychedelic theory, to neurotechnology development, to mapping and studying the computational properties of consciousness. Andrés blogs at qualiacomputing.com.

Cube Flipper: With a deep understanding of wave dynamics and visual perception, Cube is dedicated to uncovering the intricacies of visual phenomena. In addition to their research at QRI, they also share their insights and findings on their personal blog smoothbrains.net.

What We’re Fundraising For:

To continue this groundbreaking work, we’re seeking support for:

  • Core operations: Salaries to keep QRI’s team intact for another year (and hopefully many more)​
  • Two major retreats: The 2026 DMT phenomenology retreat and a 5-MeO-DMT awakening retreat
  • Research outputs: Publishing papers and studies, including upcoming pain quantification research (currently private, soon to be released)​
  • Technology development: Bringing crowdsourced phenomenology visualization tools to a fully functional state to crowd-source the mapping of the state-space of consciousness​ (first batch to be released on November 20th)
  • Additional initiatives: Cluster Headache relief research and research in digital sentience (we will announce two QRI-incubated initiatives that further these two causes)

Whether you’re a researcher, artist, meditator, potential funder, or simply fascinated by the nature of consciousness, this event offers a rare opportunity to see cutting-edge phenomenological research as it unfolds. We’re also gauging interest for the 2026 retreat: if you have relevant expertise (mathematics, physics, meditation, visual arts), funding capacity, or alignment with this vision of consciousness research, we’d love to connect.

If you’re unable to make it but would still like to contribute to our research efforts, you can donate at qri.org/donate or with crypto on our Endaoment page.

RSVP to the Event

Technical Appendix: Recent Developments


​This year’s QRI-associated essays reveal multiple converging lines of investigation:

Non-Linear Optics Framework: A generative framework exploring how the brain might render world simulations using optical elements. Key metaphors include Laser Chess (where local classical moves set constraints, then holistic standing wave patterns emerge) and Cel Animation (describing how the world simulation is constructed with independent layers controlled by different modules that overlap and interact in a shared perceptual workspace). This includes work on beamsplitter holography to explain Indra’s Net phenomenology.

Fractional Fourier TransformRecent work explores how the brain may *utilize* the fractional Fourier transform, which is a generalization that smoothly interpolates between spatial and frequency domains. This could explain characteristic ringing artifacts in psychedelic visual fields and provide a biologically plausible mechanism for massively parallel pattern recognition.

Coupling Kernels and CDNS and Field Topology: A breakthrough framework showing how systems of coupled oscillators can both tune into resonant modes and control the topological structure of fields. This provides a direct causal chain from molecular interactions (neurotransmitters, psychedelics) to the structure of conscious experience. The coupling kernel acts as a “field-shaping operator”, the same mathematical object simultaneously modulates neural dynamics and field structure, explaining how psychedelics produce such radically different yet structurally consistent effects across participants and experiences. We hypothesize that DMT effectively implements a Mexican-hat coupling profile (strong negative coupling at short distances, positive at medium distances) creating competing clusters of coherence, while 5-MeO-DMT drives systems toward global phase synchronization. This connects to the Consonance-Dissonance-Noise Signature (CDNS) approach, which describes valence in terms of spectral properties such as consonance tracking positive valence, dissonance negative valence, and noise neutral valence. We we will make the case for why this proof-of-concept demonstrations are compelling and point toward testable predictions.

Ongoing Foundational Work: QRI continues to develop frameworks including the CDNS approach, the Topological Solution to the Boundary Problem (explaining how unified experiences emerge with precise boundaries), liquid crystal dynamics as phenomenologically significant, and logarithmic scales of pleasure and pain for rigorous quantification of experiential quality.

Catch up on the latest:

Binding, Minds & the Platonic Realm: Michael Levin, Andres Gomez Emilsson & Elan Barenholtz

How Networks Vibrate: From Oscillators to Eigenmodes

A Salon on Consciousness, Holograms, and Digital Psychedelics

Different Types of Artificial Minds: Digital, Analogue, and Hybrid

The Future of Consciousness: Consciousness and What It Means to Continue to Be

DMT for Cluster Headaches: Aborting and Preventing Extreme Pain with Tryptamines and Other Methods

Learn more:

The Case for DMT for Cluster Headaches: Practical Tips & Why It Deserves Urgent Scientific Attention

Transcript:

Using DMT to Abort Cluster Headaches

May all beings be free from suffering, especially those who are trapped in hell.

Welcome everybody. Today we’re going to talk about a pretty gnarly topic, but it’s a very important one. I think if we focus as a community and make direct, persistent action towards these goals, we will be improving the world in an unprecedented way—maybe more significant than the introduction of anesthesia to medicine. And I don’t say this lightly. I actually think it is up there as a possible gift to the world.

On Discussing Extreme Suffering

Now, I am going to be talking about extreme suffering. I don’t only talk about extreme suffering—I talk about a lot of interesting things. I talk about the geometry of DMT levels, the joy of jhanas, the phenomenology of MDMA and unconditional love, and lots of things. I think it’s important to talk about the full spectrum: to understand the positives, the extreme positives, the things that get us going in the morning, the reasons to be alive. But we cannot neglect the other side—the things that actually make us not want to exist.

There are big things we can do to push the global hedonic range away from touching the extremes of suffering. At the very least, we can deliver access to safe, sustainable, wonderful technologies that produce MDMA-like states of love and empathy and bodily wellness. But the complete package is not complete without really emphasizing that intense suffering is a very big deal and it is morally urgent that we actually tackle it.

I’m going to give you some basics, what I have seen works and doesn’t work, information about what we’re planning to do in the future, and some requests—especially for anybody who has used this technique to abort cluster headaches. Please contact us. We would love to get your testimonial. There’s a link in the description where we’re gathering video testimonials, which I think are the most powerful, especially from a PR perspective for spreading the word. Written testimonials are also welcome—we’re happy to just have an interview with you and turn that into text, whatever works.

There are also some more experimental experiments that I think are extremely high value and probably fairly safe. I don’t want to come across as saying “please do this,” but if you have a high risk tolerance and you suffer from this condition and you’re willing to experiment a little bit, you may provide enormously useful information for the world.

Introduction: DMT for Cluster Headaches

So let’s get started. We’re going to talk about using DMT to abort cluster headaches. This surprises people, right? I mention this and people think I’m joking. It’s the DMT guy, the guy who talks about the hyperbolic geometry of DMT experiences, now saying that DMT cures cluster headaches and migraines. It really sounds crackpot-y, like the kind of hippie who will say that royal honey mixed with pollen cures pancreatic cancer or something.

Yes, I mean, I do think about DMT all the time, so yeah, he who has a hammer will see everything as a nail. But in this case, I swear that’s not what’s happening. This took me by surprise and I would not be promoting this if I didn’t actually think this was a really serious possible intervention for reducing drastic amounts of suffering in the world.

Background: Heavy Tails of Valence

The first time I found out about this was around 2019 when I was conducting some research on the logarithmic scales of pleasure and pain. This is written up in EA Forum posts, as well as in peer-reviewed papers with Chris Percy and other collaborators. We rebranded it as the heavy tails of valence hypothesis, which roughly says that the intense experiences—the intense range of both pleasure and pain—is not just one or twice as intense as the mid-ranges but potentially one or two orders of magnitude.

We provided compelling reasons to believe that 10 out of 10 pain—such as what you may experience with kidney stones or severe benzo withdrawal (people don’t believe me but it really does seem to be the case) or cluster headaches (cluster headaches may actually go higher than 10 out of 10, although that’s a topic I’m not going to talk very much about today)—in all of those cases, if you talk to people who have undergone those extreme experiences, generally speaking they will say that the actual intensity of the suffering and discomfort was 10, 100, maybe even a thousand times brighter, worse, more repugnant than something they might describe as five out of 10 pain.

I’m not going to repeat the reasons—there are articles online and presentations I’ve given specifically about this topic. But this is something I feel quite confident on.

The Priority of Addressing Extreme Suffering

Starting from that basis, I recognized: just as in effective altruism people realize that if you apply this 80/20 logic for where to donate your money to improve the lives of people in the world, if you understand that suffering follows this extreme distribution—where the top 1% of suffering is just orders of magnitude worse than the top 2%, and so on—it really ought to reprioritize how you see the world when it comes to making it better. Cutting off the extremes, the negative extremes, becomes a tacit priority.

I would argue you don’t need to be a classic utilitarian to actually believe this. From deontological perspectives, from virtue ethics, and of course from negative utilitarianism, classic utilitarianism, prioritarianism—pretty much any popular, sensible ethical framework that I can think of would essentially agree that if there is a ridiculously cheap intervention that is very effective against some of the worst types of suffering, that bubbles up as a priority.

Now, a utilitarian may want to know more. They may actually want to know: how many patients? How much do they actually suffer? How much are you actually going to relieve their suffering? And how much is it going to cost? If you are of that ilk, we have a pretty thorough analysis largely done by my collaborator Alfredo Parra in EA forums, titled “Quantifying the Global Burden of Cluster Headaches and Migraines.”

Essentially, we use empirical data as well as explicit assumptions which you can tweak—you can put your own numbers on the various assumptions. With that, it is a fairly robust finding that cluster headaches bubble up as one of the major causes of suffering in the world. Meaning that even though they’re not that common, if you actually prevent them, you’re going to be getting rid of a significant percent of world suffering—maybe double digits. Imagine that. Imagine something simple like distributing DMT cartridges to people who suffer from cluster headaches. You can manufacture them for like $3 to $5, and if you’re mass-producing them and cutting down 15% of the world’s suffering—imagine that.

That is the sort of thing that keeps me very motivated and hopeful on this topic because it really does seem very doable. But there are of course a lot of caveats and important considerations.

My Confidence Level

I’m going to give you an info dump. Pretty much everything that I’m going to be telling you, my level of confidence on it is between moderate and very high. Nothing that I will tell you is something that I feel like I’m not sure about or iffy about. Now, it’s very likely that I will make mistakes—this is an ongoing area of research. It’s quite likely that we will find counterexamples to some of the things that I will tell you, or we may find better protocols. But I do think that sharing what I know with the world as soon as possible in a consumable format is actually really beneficial.

Without further ado, I’m just going to go through the content. I’m trying to speak more slowly—David Pearce recommended I do that. Otherwise I just power through. But yeah, speaking more slowly, carrying a calm vibe. Let’s not get too agitated just because we’re talking about a very gnarly topic. Actually, as an aside, that might be one of the things that people value about some of my videos and content: I do talk about very gnarly topics, but hopefully with a good vibe and compassion, as opposed to helplessness or suffering. It does make me extremely sad that these things exist, but I think that the best way forward is actually carrying a good vibe and just focusing on the effort. That is what’s going to work.

Basic Facts About Cluster Headaches

First of all, some of the basics: one in a thousand people suffer from cluster headaches. Typically they present themselves as episodes that last between one hour to up to three hours. For some people it’s as short as 40 minutes, but usually that is the range. They tend to happen at the same time every day. They tend to divide into two types: episodic and chronic.

People who have episodic cluster headaches only experience them for a fraction of the year—maybe two months or three months. It’s typically seasonally triggered. People may actually have knowledge that their cluster headaches get activated around, say, February 20th, and it’s very reliable. And at the same time of the day.

Researchers suggest that this indicates cluster headaches are related to the circadian rhythm, at the very least, or hormonal releases through circadian rhythm adjustments. Another interesting reason to believe this is that cluster headaches actually adjust to daylight savings time. Somebody might be having cluster headaches at 11 p.m. every day, and then daylight savings time starts, and then over the next several days it goes from 11 p.m. to 11:20, 11:40, and then adjusts to midnight, which is the same point in the day relative to when they usually go to sleep. So it really seems to be implicated with the circadian rhythm.

The Pain of Cluster Headaches

The pain of cluster headaches is extraordinary. I have not experienced it thankfully. I really hope I never experience it. It seems to be one of those pains that is inherently traumatizing. I am very skeptical, for example, that even advanced Zen monks would be able to not transform that pain into suffering. I’m very skeptical because it’s worse than being burned alive. It’s worse than amputation without anesthesia. It’s worse than a lot of things that you would imagine pain going as far as. And the very horrible thing is that not only does it go further than that, but it actually may do so by an order of magnitude or more.

You often hear people saying, “From a scale from 0 to 10, a cluster headache is a 15.” And I don’t think they’re kidding. They are using something like a logarithmic scale implicitly here.

Pain and Suffering Are Interconnected

Here’s something that I get often: people often prioritize psychedelics for depression and anxiety, and so on, which of course is good. It’s good that we are doing that research and advancing those causes. However, it is very common for people—this is naive, not that they’re bad people or that they lack compassion, this is just naivety—you just don’t know that really intense pain essentially tends to just transmute into extreme suffering, and also extreme psychological pain.

So cluster headache patients experience not only 10 out of 10 pain physically—they might describe it feeling like there’s a red-hot ice pick entering your eye and being wiggled around as a torture device of sorts, like “Why am I still alive? How is this pain not killing me?” That is the typical response. But if that wasn’t enough, it also comes with a profound sense of doom, a sense of abandonment, a sense that God betrayed you, a sense that reality hates you.

Again, I haven’t experienced these. I’ve experienced very unpleasant psychedelic states, bad trip-like states of consciousness back in the day—not in a long while. But I am familiar with what a pretty unpleasant psychedelic state might be. They tell me this is worse. That the doom you feel on a cluster headache is itself next level. If you could isolate the doom independent of the pain, that also would be an outlier in and of itself.

So I really want to emphasize that this concern that “Well, I can deal with pain, the thing I can’t deal with is depression” is misguided. You just don’t know the reality of things. I don’t want to be condescending, but it really does seem to be the case. This is very significant from the point of view of effective altruism.

A Sociological Observation

This is a bit of a sociological observation, but high systematizers tend to actually on average have high pain thresholds. This may have to do with prenatal testosterone and the empathizing-systematizing spectrum. I think it’s actually very common for high systematizers to not suffer very much because of physical pain, especially not in their youth, especially if they don’t have a chronic condition or aren’t suffering from migraines or something like that.

So it is not that uncommon, I think, for the people who call the shots about what we should prioritize to themselves just be ignorant about this matter. They just don’t know that pain of this sort exists and that it is also suffering. There isn’t a clean distinction. In fact, I would argue that pain and suffering are two sides of the same coin. They’re really dissonance in the field at the end of the day, except that pain is really high-frequency dissonance, highly localized, whereas suffering is low-frequency holographic dissonance. This is a very speculative thing, but I suspect that mathematically they’re tapping into the same thing. They’re not fundamentally different things, and they’re both bad.

So let’s stop this idea that suffering is independent from pain or that pain is not as bad as depression or anxiety or something like that, which is just not the case.

Also, talking to Bob Wold and people who have these conditions, they will effectively assert that for most cluster headache patients, they have comorbid depression and anxiety, but it’s not independent of the cluster headache. In fact, it’s usually caused by the cluster headache. A single cluster headache will typically give you lifelong PTSD, from what I’ve heard.

Long-Tail Distributions

I must emphasize, because these are long tails: a person’s cluster headache may be itself 10 times less bad than another person’s cluster headache, which makes this a little bit murky. I’m a little bit cautious generalizing too much because for some people they may say their cluster headache was not as bad as their kidney stone. And lo and behold, kidney stones also follow a long-tail distribution.

These long-tail distributions will keep coming up whenever we do a hedonic analysis, is my claim. There’s a very simple reason why, and it has to do with the multiplicative properties of these factors and how they come together to really create avalanches of activity.

The most straightforward analogy is: if you look at the distribution of avalanches in the world, some countries have a lot of avalanches and some countries have very few, and there’s a few countries that have one or two. The reason it’s so skewed is because the factors multiply each other. You need the right temperature, the right humidity, the right landscape, and the frequency of those factors itself also tends to follow these long-tail distributions. As a consequence, when you actually multiply the amplitude of all of these factors to get the amplitude of the results—such as how big the avalanches are, how much snow they carry—that distribution itself will be extremely skewed.

The factors that feed into a cluster headache, I think, are essentially something like that. So for some people, they may have a bunch of these factors, but maybe one of those factors is very low in its contribution, and therefore it all gets multiplied downwards, and they may get the impression that it’s not as bad.

We really need a science here. We’re developing it at QRI, but we really need to change to a paradigm where we acknowledge the logarithmic scales of pleasure and pain and make that a scientifically valid understanding.

Predictors of Cluster Headaches

Enough about the actual phenomenon. I do know a lot more about the specific feelings of it. I don’t think it’s very helpful to mention it here. But what I want to emphasize is that it really is that bad. People very often kill themselves to avoid any further experience of this sort.

So what are some predictors of cluster headaches? Going through the literature:

Genetics is a very big factor. If one of your close family members has cluster headaches, I believe you have a multiplier of about 18 times higher probability that you will develop cluster headaches compared to people in the general population.

Smoking—how much you smoke, how often. I’m talking about cigarettes here. I’m not aware of marijuana smoke itself being a problem, but I would actually be surprised if there wasn’t some correlation there. But it really does seem that tobacco smoke in particular is pretty bad. This is both in terms of lifetime consumption of tobacco and your probability of developing cluster headaches. If I was campaigning against tobacco use, which I think is a good thing to do all things considered, is actually a very powerful intervention potentially. I might emphasize: this is doubling, tripling, quadrupling your chances of getting cluster headaches. People don’t think about that when they start smoking. It doesn’t occur to you to consult the internet and see if the habit you’re developing has a small probability of extraordinarily bad outcomes. People don’t tend to do that. But yeah, that is a very strong factor.

Alcohol is interesting because it’s typically a trigger, but it doesn’t seem to be predictive in the sense that if you drink alcohol, that doesn’t seem to raise your chances that you will develop cluster headaches. But if you have cluster headaches, it is highly advisable that you do not drink. I cannot count how many times I’ve seen Reddit posts in r/clusterheads of people saying, “Oh, I really shouldn’t have had that one beer.” It really was not worth it. They have one beer in a bar thinking, “Yeah, it’s been a while. I don’t get clusters,” and then going back home, they just have to stop in the middle of the highway and wait it out while screaming in agony for three hours. So alcohol is a very well-known trigger. Very, very worth avoiding.

Head trauma is another predictor of cluster headaches.

Sleep apnea—obstructive sleep apnea—which is surprising and interesting. If you’re at risk or you suffer from clusters, I would definitely recommend checking out and treating your obstructive apnea.

Age: Essentially, onset of cluster headaches at later ages, or when you’re older, predicts that they’re much more likely to be chronic, meaning that it’s something that you would experience every day.

Why I’m So Confident

Let’s move on to why I’m so confident—actually, we as a community at this point, the core team of collaborators at QRI and people who are trying to move this cause forward. Why are we so convinced? Because there’s no peer-reviewed published article in a credible journal that says DMT aborts and prevents cluster headaches, right? So why am I so confident? Why am I willing to stake my reputation and put a flag in here and say, “God damn it, this is very important”?

Because the evidence is actually really strong. It’s just unconventional. There are a lot of situations where this happens.

Just one example: When COVID was starting, you would see in the media people talk about how “there’s no evidence that this is going to become a pandemic, there’s no peer-reviewed study that indicates that COVID is going to become a pandemic.” But the rationalists were saying, “Okay, this is growing exponentially,” and were seeing where the trend goes and were saying, “Yep, this is going to become a pandemic. It’s unstoppable now.” They were raising those alarms a month before there was some kind of mainstream consensus that, “Oh dang, yes, this is inevitably a pandemic.”

When you have a high concentration of smart, dedicated people who are checking each other’s work and have a tradition of having good epistemology and actually really care about the outcomes, often times you’ve got to trust that as opposed to the official line. Because the official line—there are often structural reasons why the truth just doesn’t come out until it’s too late.

The other very good example I think is anesthesia—the development of anesthesia for surgery. This was discovered by Humphry Davy and then Michael Faraday: that nitrous oxide and ether, chloroform, taken at sufficient concentrations would actually make you unconscious and also just completely numb to intense physical sensations. This is something that they knew with high confidence because they had personally tried it. They had tried it with friends. Things such as: “Well, okay, I’m having this extreme pain in my teeth. I need a teeth procedure,” and then they would use chloroform and it’s like, “Wow, okay, I don’t feel it at all.”

But somehow that information just didn’t really convince doctors. It really didn’t convince the mainstream. And it really wasn’t until 45 years later—almost 50 years later—where there were public demonstrations of using anesthesia for surgery where it actually worked. I think that this could have been accelerated. I don’t want to be so cynical to say it’s just human nature to ignore these huge blessings and forget about them and have hundreds of millions of people suffering in the meantime. No, I mean, I think we can get better at it. But we’re not very good at it yet, it seems.

The Inside View: Bob Wold’s Experience

Very concretely though, why am I super, super confident? The inside view is as follows:

Bob Wold, founder of Clusterbusters—he was looking for medicines that could help his own cluster headaches for years, like I believe 20 to 30 years. He tried up to 70 different compounds in all kinds of dosages and combinations and protocols—while the cluster headache is happening, before, after—and pretty much nothing worked until he explored psychedelics. Then he had near-miraculous relief.

Now, the psychedelics are tricky. The standard protocol that was started to be developed by this community—essentially a “busting protocol,” as they describe it—involves taking psilocybin or LSD, say, once every three weeks. It doesn’t talk about DMT originally. But down the line, when Bob actually encountered DMT, he said, “Oh my gosh, actually this works way better. This actually aborted right away. I don’t have to wait 30 minutes for the LSD to kick in to start to feel some kind of relief. I can just take a very small dose of DMT and within 10 seconds the pain goes from 10 out of 10 to 1 out of 10.”

So we’re talking about stratospheric effect sizes being reported by somebody who thoroughly knows all of the alternatives, is at the center of this community of people who are highly motivated to find cures, and who reports that it works just better than everything else that they have tried.

And it’s not just him. You will see in the QRI YouTube channel I have an interview with people from Clusterbusters—Joe McKay, for example, who is a 9/11 survivor. He dealt with a lot of PTSD from that and developed cluster headaches. Yes, psychedelics helped him enormously, and he was so thankful for mushrooms. They gave him hope. They really reduced his suffering. But then DMT—DMT is breakthrough, man. And I don’t mean breakthrough in the sense that it can take you to a breakthrough level experience, although it can also do that, but breakthrough from a medical perspective, from an ethical, moral urgency, triage perspective. It is a breakthrough that DMT just seems to be in a league of its own when it comes to how good it is at solving this.

In fact, Bob Wold, as he describes in that interview, actually suspects that cluster headaches are literally caused by not having enough endogenous DMT. I don’t know about that, but it is telling that such a person would actually say, “Yeah, maybe this is the cause. It’s not only a really good treatment; it’s actually the reason why we’re getting cluster headaches—that maybe you’re having some circadian rhythm-dependent, hormonal imbalance-dependent lack of endogenous DMT.” What is the DMT doing there to begin with? Who knows. But it is there. We do have DMT in us.

Additional Evidence

But it’s not just that. In 2019, before talking to them directly, just randomly interviewing people who have gone through cluster headaches, I was aware that psilocybin seems to help. But I just randomly encountered a guy from South Africa who said, “Yeah, after I found DMT, that’s all I need, and I don’t understand why this is not more well-known.” And I thought, “Huh, hold on a second.”

Since then there have been significant developments. I mean, on a more proximal, semi-personal note: I’ve been spreading this information around, and I cannot tell you the joy that I get when I get a message—let’s say from the dad of a friend who suffers from cluster headaches—saying, “Thank you for sharing this. Now my cluster headaches are pretty much taken care of.”

There is enormous value in spreading this information. Essentially, when people I have encountered are in a condition to try this and are in the depths of a cluster headache, it works. Actually, I have a friend who witnessed this firsthand. He was hanging out with a friend—he didn’t know he had cluster headaches. His friend had had cluster headaches before, but my friend didn’t know. Then all of a sudden, hanging out, his friend starts having this enormous pain and just gets to the ground in fetal position and is screaming and making all these horrible noises.

My friend remembered, “Huh, I remember that DMT actually helps.” And it just so happened that his roommate had a DMT vape pen because they’re in the psychedelic sphere, roughly, or adjacently at the very least. He found the DMT vape pen and gave it to him. He just took a tiny bit, and within 30 seconds it went from being on the floor, weeping and screaming, to being able to have just a normal conversation.

So, god damn. It’s one thing to hear a few scattered anecdotes. Another thing is to say: when people are suffering from cluster headaches and if you suggest this and they try it, it typically works. That is so much more encouraging and powerful.

Ongoing Research

But there are many other reasons to believe this. In fact, currently there is a legitimate Yale study being conducted specifically about this—about DMT for cluster headaches. It’s led by Dr. Emmanuelle Schindler, arguably the leading researcher on the topic of psychedelics for cluster headaches. So I have no doubt that in the near to medium-term future, there’s going to be scientific consensus that this works. It is just very tragic that we didn’t act on it first.

The Qualia Research Institute has published pieces on cluster headaches, notably:

Also of note, the Eleusinia Retreat center in Mexico is offering DMT to patients who seek to treat their cluster headaches (see Andrés’ interview with the retreat founder, Jessica Khurana)

Medication Interactions – CRITICAL INFORMATION

Moving on—very important information: medication interactions. This is actually very hands-on, very important.

Do not combine psychedelics with lithium. That is one of the most dangerous interactions that you can have. If you’re taking high-dose lithium for, for example, bipolar disorder, and you accidentally take one hit of LSD, you are likely going to have horrible seizures and be completely out of it with convulsions. You might need to be hospitalized. So lithium and psychedelics is no joke.

I think very small amounts of lithium and psychedelics don’t have that much of a problem. I’ve actually heard anecdotes of people who have combined them and it hasn’t been a disaster. But I would not mess with that. I would just not mess with combining lithium and psychedelics. Very important caveat.

Some of the substances that are prescribed for cluster headaches do interact with psychedelics. DMT in particular is so physiologically safe and also so short-acting—if you’re just vaporizing it—that interactions are unlikely to be fatal. But you really should avoid them, to the extent that it is possible.

Very relevant: Ergotamines, triptans, MAOIs (as we know, in ayahuasca it’s combined to extend effects). SSRIs. But the really, really important ones to avoid are those that might cause serotonin syndrome if you’re combined with them, or extreme vasoconstriction.

So before you mess with psychedelics, if you’re taking any medication—even any random supplement, magnesium, whatever it may be—always, always, always check that you’re not going to have a horrible interaction. Chances are it’s going to be fine, but there are some things that you really have to avoid.

As a first pass, absolutely consult with a doctor or ChatGPT—or Claude, or whoever plays ball. Whichever of these large language models will play ball, they actually will have a lot of really good information. But double-check, double-check.

An important piece of advice: In places where they do use psychedelics to treat cluster headaches or migraines, they will ask you to essentially wean yourself off of other medications so that ideally you can take, let’s say, the DMT in a body that doesn’t have anything that might interact with it. It might not be necessary actually for a lot of medications, but that is the protocol they often recommend.

A few things are probably actually totally fine. For example, beta blockers. I wouldn’t worry about those. You can even find Alexander Shulgin having taken beta blockers and combining them with LSD. I think that’s one of the trip reports in PiHKAL—might not have been LSD, but another lysergamide.

Technique Matters

Next point: A lot of ways to treat these conditions are quite sensitive to the technique.

I’ll give you an example. Oxygen—whatever the case, if you have cluster headaches, you should get oxygen. That actually should be: no matter what, you should get oxygen, because that may actually just be enough. For a lot of people it isn’t, but for a lot of people it is. But for a lot of people oxygen doesn’t really work. But then if you dig deep into it, the reason it doesn’t work is that they’re not using it properly.

Let me give you a hint: You need a lot of oxygen. There is a video on YouTube where a member of Clusterbusters is educating a group of people on how to use oxygen. He’s showing, “Well, the cannulas that they give you maybe in the ER or something—a little bit of air through the nose—no, that’s not going to do it.” Even a specific valve that you use to breathe oxygen through your mouth has to have the right shape and width to allow enough volume fast enough.

The suggested protocol when you’re starting to feel a cluster headache and you have oxygen nearby is to go and take the high-flow oxygen and breathe really hard. That is what has a decent chance of aborting a cluster headache.

So for any of these things, make sure that you’re actually investigating the right technique. Chances are, if it’s not working, maybe the technique has to be tweaked. It might not be that the intervention doesn’t work; it’s that you’re just not doing it quite right. That’s an important piece of advice, and this is absolutely the case with DMT.

As I will describe in a second, there is an art to it, and it works differently for different people. Again, maybe because of the multifactorial contribution to the probability of a cluster headache—different people have different factors that are contributing to it. So you might need slightly different techniques in a very personalized fashion.

5-MeO-DMT Does Not Work (For Most)

The next point I want to make is that 5-MeO-DMT doesn’t seem to work very well in this case. It works for some people—there are actually some reports of people trying 5-MeO-DMT for cluster headaches and they get instant relief. However, there are also reports, more numerous, of people trying 5-MeO-DMT on a cluster headache and it not working, which is a pretty bad idea.

Especially, for example, if you confused it with N,N-DMT. Because 5-MeO is so much more potent, it’s easy to overdo, and it causes this time dilation effect. So that’s actually a hazard. If you take 5-MeO-DMT while you’re having a cluster headache, you’re increasing the subjective duration of that cluster headache, arguably the overall suffering. So yeah, don’t do it. It’s not recommended.

Whereas there are other things that are not as powerful as DMT—ketamine, for example. Ketamine doesn’t seem to hurt though. So if you suffer from cluster headaches, give ketamine a shot. I mean, it may be enough. Typically it isn’t, but it is reported as something that both lessens the pain and also extends the duration of remission.

Protocols

Okay, so protocols. Let’s say that yes, you have weaned off of some of the key medicines. You’re not at risk of serotonin syndrome or anything of the sort. How do you approach this?

Well, here’s the very encouraging piece of information: It seems that for most sufferers, you need very little. We’re talking about like 3 milligrams. I don’t know how familiar you are with the intensity scale for DMT, but let me give you a little bit of a sense of it.

The Dose-Response Curve for DMT

The dose-response curve for DMT is highly nonlinear.

If you take 1 milligram, you might as well not have taken anything. It’s… I mean, you really have to be an advanced meditator, an advanced psychonaut with a lot of sensitivity and have slept well, etc., to notice, “Ah, maybe there’s a little bit of a change at 1 milligram.” Well, I bet deep in a meditation retreat you probably could notice, but…

2 milligrams: Maybe things feel a little bit moist and liquidy, and you feel a little bit wet. It’s hard to describe. That’s approximately the direction of the effect.

At 3 milligrams, you start seeing colors a little bit brighter. Maybe a sense that things are not melting, but things are liquefying a little bit. You may not even notice it. Interestingly, at that dosage, it is actually very clear-headed. It is not psychologically challenging. I mean, if you are really anxious and you take 3 milligrams of DMT, you may make the anxiety a little bit worse. It also may make it better. For a lot of people, small-dose DMT is actually really calming and relaxing.

Recently at a psychedelic retreat, I was hanging out with somebody who for the first time was trying DMT. He was very afraid of it. I said, “Yeah, I’m very happy to sit for you. If you want to take the DMT right next to me, I’ll be here for you. You’ll be safe.” He was being very cautious and taking very small amounts. And he was like, “Whoa, I did not expect it to feel so mellow. I didn’t know it was so mellow.”

Well, he wasn’t taking 10 milligrams. But yeah, at that range for a lot of people it’s very relaxing. It’s not depersonalizing typically. I would say it’s psychologically maybe comparable in how challenging it might be to like 2 milligrams of an edible THC where you can barely feel it.

By the time we get to 5 milligrams, well, that’s where the interesting qualia starts to emerge. That’s where you start getting some sense of things strobing. There’s some kind of liquid or viscous, vibrating membrane that starts to deposit on top of your sensory fields.

By the time you get to 10 milligrams, then we’re in the territory of this being as intense as two hits of LSD or something like that. Still though, typically not as psychologically challenging. I think there’s a very deep reason why, and it has to do with the frequency of the effects—by which I mean the frequency of the vibrations. It tends to be very high frequency. LSD is not as high frequency. So interestingly, DMT affects your world simulation very deeply, but it affects first and foremost the high frequencies.

Your sense of self is actually a mid-frequency type of representation. And so it’s not affected until you take a lot of DMT. So even 10 milligrams of DMT is surprising: “Wow, actually I can think clearly. I know who I am. I know what I did. But oh my gosh, everything is so trippy.”

When you get to like 15 milligrams, that is when it starts to become seriously psychedelic and is where DMT is unmistakably its own thing. No other drug—maybe other very similar drugs like DPT for example have similar characteristics—but none of the mainstream psychedelics. It has its own unique flavor at that dosage, and nothing is going to replicate it.

If you actually want to have the blast of a breakthrough experience where you completely dissociate from your body and you don’t know where you are—interestingly, you still probably remember who you are and the fact that you’re on DMT—that’s like the 30 milligram range. And if you want to also forget who you are or maybe become one with the universe, so to speak, but still full of checkerboard patterns and intense tactile-visual synesthetic sensations, 50 milligrams.

So there’s a wide range. I would say if you’re staying between 0 and 5 milligrams, it for most people really is not a very challenging experience at all. Again, people react to substances quite differently. So always start with a very small amount and familiarize yourself with it.

But what I want to say is that in the case of aborting cluster headaches, most of the reports emphasize that they only needed a little bit. They only needed enough for the colors to be a little bit bright and you feel safe, grounded. You’re not traveling to other dimensions or being invaded by UFOs or the Nordics or whatever it would be. No, no, no. That’s not what’s going to happen. So I’ve got to reassure you of that.

Titration

The other thing too is that if it doesn’t work right away, you can keep taking it. So you take 3 milligrams, you hold it in for 30 seconds—well, some people say hold it in, some people say experiment with also not holding it in and see if that works a little bit better. There are some discrepancies depending on who you ask who uses this technique. But generally speaking, yes: take 3 milligrams, wait 30 seconds, see if it’s lessening the pain. If it’s not really, then take another 3 milligrams, wait another 30 seconds up to a minute, see how you’re feeling, then take another. And you can keep doing it.

I mean, for some people it may take four or five. For some people it just doesn’t work, and that’s important to mention. Unfortunately, no therapy works for everybody. In this case, I am estimating, based on anecdotes and a lot of people I’ve talked to—DMT probably will work for more than 80% of people is my current guess when done optimally. But there are some people for whom it just doesn’t seem to work, which is of course extremely tragic.

But in general, the typical use case is where you only need one or two very low doses. We’re talking about 10 out of 10 pain going all the way to 1 out of 10 pain, 0 out of 10 pain. For some people, it may be only up to 3 out of 10 pain, but that’s still a massive, massive difference. I would argue even if this only took you from 10 out of 10 pain to 9 out of 10 pain, that still would be a huge ethical improvement. It would still be massive from an ethics point of view.

Experimentation and Prophylactic Use

I will say: Experiment quite a bit. Highly recommended to experiment with DMT outside of the cluster headache episode. I mean, DMT itself is prophylactic when it comes to preventing future cluster headaches. So actually, some of the people I’ve talked to who for years were taking high-dose psilocybin every three weeks—now they actually just get by by having one breakthrough DMT experience as a prophylactic once every three weeks. With that, they just don’t get cluster headaches anymore. That is in the huge success category.

Interestingly, these people actually learned eventually to actually enjoy the DMT experience and not be afraid of it, which tells you that a lot of the discomfort you may experience on DMT is actually psychological and is resistance to the weirdness of the state.

What I can tell you from by now over a thousand DMT experiences at all dosages is—I generally don’t say I’m experienced at things. I’m not an experienced piano player. I’m not an experienced painter. But I am an experienced DMT user. I really am.

What I can tell you is that there are some gnarly, unpleasant DMT states, especially if you’re in a bad mood to begin with (which I have experimented with, again in safe, legal contexts—thankfully I’m very grateful). But on the whole, if you just focus on: “Okay, how actually unpleasant is this? Am I making it a bigger deal than it has to be?” It is—it can be unpleasant, but it is at the level of a cold plunge, let’s say. You can endure a cold plunge. Going into fairly cold water is an unpleasant experience, but can you do it? Can you be there for one minute and survive it and not freak out and not be screaming around and trying to resist and just going to try to ease into it? You absolutely can with training and determination and some mindfulness and maybe some exercise before and breathwork and preparation. You absolutely can do it.

So I would say it’s sort of similar. DMT can be quite unpleasant, but physically it’s not going to kill you. And if you just mindfully understand: “Okay, these are a bunch of really fast dissonant sensations,” it’s not that bad.

When I talk to people who suffer from cluster headaches, it’s like: “Well, okay, relative to a cluster headache, how bad was the worst you felt on just DMT?” And they will say, “Yeah, it’s a joke. It’s just incomparable.” Different planets. Different universes. We’re not talking about the same thing.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Which is why—this is one of the key reasons why I think: oh my gosh, there is a legitimate concern that promoting psychedelics to reduce extreme pain will give people bad trips. Yes. Absolutely. That’s an important thing to prevent. But from an ethical standpoint, from a moral standpoint, I think the cost-benefit analysis is so skewed that the chances of a bad trip have to be pretty high for it to not be worth it.

In these cases, usually—yes, I mean, the typical pattern is that if somebody’s been suffering from cluster headaches for years and they were saying, “Well, I wanted to exhaust the medical interventions before I went into actually trying psychedelics in Mexico or Canada or something like that”—typically they will say, “I wish I had done that earlier. I wish I had done that 10 years earlier. I wouldn’t have had to endure hundreds, thousands of PTSD-producing events.” Yeah. No, that is a typical response. Even taking into account the uncomfortable, unpleasant high-dose psilocybin experiences that may have come with it.

Other Concerns

There are other concerns, of course. DMT, especially high doses consumed frequently, can produce delusional disorder and also sensory disturbances, HPPD. This is, I think, really, really unlikely if you’re just doing 3 milligrams every now and then to avoid a cluster headache. That’s not, I don’t think, really that much of a concern. But it is important to put out there that maybe you become too comfortable with DMT and you start doing it a lot. You really have to check in with others to see if your epistemology is going haywire.

A Note on Epistemology

By the way, maybe I should mention this: I’m friends with a bunch of people who care a lot about epistemology, including OG rationalists. A good friend of mine, Justin Shovelain, for example—we’ve been meeting a bunch about all sorts of things for many years, mostly having to do with psychometrics, consciousness, intelligence, AI safety, things of that nature. He, broadly speaking, has been always telling me, “Well, your sanity half-life might not be that long just given the sort of experiments that you run on yourself.” So every couple of years I have a conversation with him where he tests my epistemology, to make sure that: am I actually doing appropriate Bayesian inference given the sensory input that I have and the information that I’ve consumed and integrated? And how good am I actually at evaluating the quality of evidence and information?

Mostly because some of the conclusions I have arrived at are pretty weird. But I’ve got to reassure you: after having gone through several pretty pointed epistemic evaluations, I’m fine. I’m fine, guys. My capacity to do Bayesian inference is just fine. It’s just the information on which I’m applying that Bayesian inference is generally speaking not available to most people. That’s what I would argue.

Of course, I can make mistakes. I can be confident in things that I’m wrong about, etc. But essentially, if your self-image is, let’s say, that of a philosopher-scientist, curious explorer, as opposed to, let’s say, if your self-image is that of a grandiose shaman—well, if you think you have a grandiose shaman personality and you take a lot of DMT, the DMT space will likely confirm your suspicion that you’re here as the next Maitreya and you’re going to enlighten the world and all sorts of crazy things. You may start believing that there are UFOs in the back of the moon and they’re colluding with the Russians.

Even if it’s true though, the evidential base is probably pretty corrupted, and the inference process is often compromised. But what I want to emphasize is that this is a niche problem. It tends to also occur with personality issues. DMT itself as a compound is not typically the problem. The problem tends to be the memeplex and the pattern of views and the way it reinforces people’s personalities. Whereas direct organic damage from low-dose DMT that will mess up your epistemology? I wouldn’t worry too much about it.

The Body Buzz

Okay, other things about the protocol: What I have heard, not from everybody but from a good number of people who use DMT to avoid cluster headaches and migraines as well (although migraines is a little bit of a different conversation), is that you want to hit the level that causes this feeling of a body buzz—[makes buzzing sound]—which happens, starts to happen at around 3 milligrams. At higher doses it becomes really strong and overwhelming, and eventually your body explodes and you go to the astral realm and all of this stuff. But yeah, no—in small doses it’s typically a neutral to pleasant feeling of high-frequency vibrations in your body. It can be a little bit unpleasant and jarring, but typically it’s neutral to pleasant.

That body buzz unique to DMT seems to be the thing that somehow melts the cluster headache away. So that as a target, right? So I wouldn’t recommend that: “Hey, if you’re going to be experimenting with this treatment before you have a cluster headache and you actually need it in the moment, familiarize yourself with a vape pen.” Even additionally, have two vape pens just in case one fails. And then really learn to sensitize yourself to that feeling of the body buzz, the whole-body buzz. Develop that sensitivity: how much do you actually need to take to get that onset, that sense of whole-body relaxation? That is a target.

I would also be extremely interested if some of you suffer from clusters and try DMT following the recommendations I’ve provided, and maybe you point out: “Hey, maybe it’s not the body buzz. Maybe it is the colors. Maybe it is the sound. Maybe something else.” Maybe the thing that determines whether the DMT will work or not might not be the body buzz. I suspect it is the body buzz. I suspect it’s the body buzz—the core causal factor. And also, the founder of the Yaulosía retreat, which is the retreat in Mexico that offers this treatment—she also, based on hundreds and hundreds of experiments and experiences with people who have done this, says: “Yeah, hit the body buzz, and that’s what is going to do it.”

Lessening the Fear

Okay, so lessening the fear. Here’s where it starts to get a little bit more experimental. How do you lessen the fear to DMT and familiarize yourself with it and have actually wonderful experiences with it? How can you boost the chances of that?

Well, I already mentioned being in a good mood, right? But being in a good mood is just one aspect of it. I’m going to say bodily wellness. Bodily wellness is actually, as far as I can tell, the best predictor of a really good DMT experience, because DMT experiences are highly embodied. Really, really embodied. Vibrations in your body interlocking with vibrations in the visual field and your feelings and your body image getting twisted and contorted—again, high-dose phenomenology—but weird topologies of the energy body. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes—very, very, very, very embodied.

So you want that base to be consonant and harmonious. How do you do that?

One recommendation is: Do aerobic exercise before an experience, half an hour to an hour before, just to kind of have those endorphins running in your body. You’ve already pumped the blood through your body, and so you’re primed for letting the blood flow in your body. That’s a good state.

Even better than that, a protocol that personally has worked really well to guarantee good experiences is as follows:

  1. I do 10 minutes of breathwork—let’s say the Wim Hof guided meditation, guided breathwork.
  2. Then 10 minutes of loving-kindness meditation, a guided “may all beings be free” type of meditation.
  3. Then 10 minutes of a really relaxing spiritual song or ambient or even just green noise. The point is to go really relaxed.
  4. Then again, another 10 minutes of breathwork, Wim Hof or similar.

That protocol—it’s based on principles of neural field annealing—you’re energizing yourself, then you’re tuning to a very harmonious and consonant configuration (loving-kindness), and then you’re cooling down and settling that harmony, and then you energize it again. So you’re energizing this harmony. Then, as soon as you’re done with the second Wim Hof—I mean, if you’re feeling good, if you’re feeling joyous, if you feel like “Okay, this is pleasant in my body,” that’s a good moment to take DMT. Because the DMT is going to build on top of those sensations, and it’s going to amplify the harmonies, especially if you have as a pure intention: “Oh, may all beings be free from suffering,” or “Hey, I want to understand the nature of consciousness to benefit other beings”—that kind of clean intention with a healthy, harmonious body. Wow. Very good. Very, very, very good. Wholesome, beneficial, healthy.

Yes, I think—maybe it won’t work for everybody, but I’ve had pretty good success with that technique.

The Pyramid Method

Another one, adjacent—and you can stack these two—is something that I call the pyramid method, which is: if you want to be able to explore the higher levels of DMT—and I’m going to make a video specifically about all these methods as well at some point. I’m not in a hurry, but here’s a bit of a teaser.

You can listen to a song that you really like, that is relaxing, that you can listen to on repeat—that’s important, a song that you don’t get bored of, but is also nice and relaxing and pleasant. Because that being in the background reassures the organism that it knows where it is. It’s like, “Oh, if you’ve been doing this in your bedroom at the same hour of the day, whenever you do it, you do it at the same hour of the day. Ideally, you eat the same thing however many hours before.” You control the variables so that when you actually have the experience, as many contextual cues as possible are reassuring your subconscious that you are safe and in good hands.

Contrast that with, for example, taking DMT in a loud public place you’ve never been to. Horrible. Don’t recommend. But the more layers of safety and comfort and reassurance and familiarity you add, the higher the probability it is that you will be able to actually focus on the experience and notice the things that are different and novel and interesting and remember them, because everything else is standardized.

With that sort of method, when I’ve been in retreats, for example, in Mexico, when I’ve had again the honor of being able to explore these states, I can do small dose, then medium dose, then small dose—and that’s a pyramid. So like every time I learn to bring back a little bit more from a slightly higher dose. And then over time I may be able to do small dose, medium, high, very high dose, high, medium, small dose. And in that way, I have what we call qualia tethers. There’s a tether for an experience all along the way. So that when I hit the next level—and DMT has many levels (I say there’s six, but actually those are also subdivided, so there are strata)—when you hit the next strata, you are familiar with the previous one. You can actually compare the current one relative to the unique characteristics of the previous one and encode it better. It’s like, “Wow, okay, now it went from 3D cubes to 3D cubes that are spinning like this and now they unfolded.”

If you remember that also—oh, another detail: Ideally you look at the same thing every one of your experiences. For example, a ceiling or a picture of a flower or something—something to standardize it so that’s another factor that doesn’t change, and so you can really see the unfolding of the experience and internalize and understand the progression. So that in the future, even if you take a high dose, you’re not really that afraid, because you know the other levels.

The problem of just jumping to a high dose when you’re not very familiar with the substance—especially if you’re in a bad mood—itself can be very unpleasant. But just the sheer novelty and overwhelmingness of going through all of these strata one at a time and not being able to recognize any single one of them—that novelty blast is too much.

But when you climb a mountain one step at a time and then come back—climbing Everest, acclimatizing—that is very, very reassuring to the organism. You can go very deep and have very little fear. I mean, fear seems to be largely a psychological reaction on DMT. If you don’t have that reaction, you can actually take fairly high doses of DMT and surprisingly be pretty calm, which I find mind-blowing.

Now, a panic attack on DMT is exceptionally unpleasant, and I think it’s because it activates feedback loops. But if you’re calm on a DMT state, the feedback loop just doesn’t have anything to work with. And so it’s zero to the nth. It will continue to be zero.

Downsides

Okay, so downsides. Yes. Bad trips, I talked about that. Psychological trauma, taking too much accidentally. Bad trips, psychological trauma—there are a lot of things that can happen with psychedelics, even when you take them in optimal circumstances.

Again, what I can say is that from everybody I’ve talked to who have used this as therapy for cluster headaches, they just don’t consider this comparable. So they say, “Well, yeah, even if there is some risk, I’m willing to take it, because from the moral calculus here, yes, I would rather have this than another cluster.”

But interestingly, one of the things that I thought was fascinating is: even if you’re, for example, in the middle of a psilocybin mushroom experience and you get a cluster headache—which sometimes happens, it’s rare, but sometimes it happens—they still recommend taking DMT during that psilocybin experience may actually abort the cluster headache, which I find mind-blowing. Again, hinting at maybe DMT’s unique capabilities in this context.

Suffering Equals Pain Times Resistance

I will also point out: the broad framework of suffering equals pain times resistance is especially helpful in managing psychedelic states of consciousness. Because if you really internalize the fact that if you lower your sense of psychological-physiological resistance to zero, pain doesn’t really turn into suffering. You can go very deep in a psychedelic and not have that much of a suffering reaction.

Again, psychedelics are unpredictable. Sometimes you may depersonalize on psychedelics even at a dose that you had taken before and nothing interesting had happened. So always, always have a sitter. All of these caveats cannot be stated enough.

Promising Avenues for Future Research

Now on to what I think are very promising avenues for future research. Again, because fear is reported as one of the key reasons why cluster headache patients don’t venture themselves into trying DMT as a treatment, I think fear-reducing interventions are super high-leverage.

One that I’m really curious about is: combination of DMT and other substances to reduce the fear component of DMT. From a recreational point of view, there are some really excellent candidates.

I can say that combining pregabalin with DMT—don’t combine pregabalin with GHB. No, no, no, no, sorry. Pregabalin and DMT—three-letter, three-letter drug. Pregabalin plus DMT. It’s fascinating because you can go very deep into the DMT space with pretty much just no fear. The anxiety response is just completely subdued or almost nearly completely subdued. It also changes the quality of the visuals a little bit in a way that actually makes me suspect even more so that liquid crystals are involved in the rendering of the world simulation and a bunch of nonlinear optics actually become more noticeable in that combination than with DMT alone. Just as an aside.

But yeah, it’s just fascinating that you can have these wild breakthrough DMT experiences and have these crazy downloads from Buddha minds and hive minds and all this weird stuff and just not be afraid at all, even without having put in the work of doing a lot of loving-kindness meditation and breathwork and all these preparations, because you took 300 milligrams of pregabalin before. A very practical consideration: I would recommend maybe taking it one hour before you intended to trip, or 90 minutes before, so it’s really hitting you.

Also very important to have a sitter. Always. But in combinations especially, because you don’t know if maybe it’s too much for your organism and now you’re going to vomit. If you took too much DMT, maybe you don’t want to drown in your own vomit. That’s less of a concern for DMT—it’s more of a concern for 5-MeO-DMT. But it’s still a concern. So always have a sitter, especially with combinations.

And then, yeah, the other substance is gabapentin, even phenibut actually, which is available as a nootropic. It’s a benzo-like substance. Maybe not as neurotoxic, but definitely just as dependence-causing (of course for treatment you wouldn’t be taking it every day, so dependence risks aren’t an issue here). Substances in the gabapentinoid class are all essentially really good with DMT as far as preventing the fear reaction goes.

GHB and DMT as a combo is promising too, but it may have a significantly higher probability of vomiting, so I don’t particularly recommend it.

But I would be really curious if somebody who suffers from cluster headaches can abort a cluster headache or can take high-dose DMT together with pregabalin and still benefit from the prophylactic and abortive effects of DMT. Because if that is the case, then hey, guys, maybe we just found a way. The protocol might be something like: yes, take pregabalin once every three weeks and then take DMT an hour later, and maybe you just don’t have any cluster headaches anymore. So I think this is really, really, really high-leverage if it turns out to work.

Ketanserin

And then the other one, which didn’t occur to me—I think this was Curran—is combining it with ketanserin. So ketanserin is a 5-HT2A antagonist, and it essentially blocks the psychedelic action of a lot of interesting agents without, in principle, blocking the action of other receptor types.

There is one compound, BOL-148, which is non-psychedelic but does have this prophylactic effect against cluster headaches, which of course should be studied very thoroughly, and ideally we accelerate that as fast as possible. Giving you a proof of concept that you really actually don’t need the psychedelia in order to prevent the pain.

So maybe a setup where you have a nasal spray of ketanserin and you just take enough to prevent the psychedelic action. Maybe you wait an hour or 45 minutes—I forget; it’s not a very long half-life, so you don’t need to wait all that long—and then you take DMT and see if DMT plus ketanserin prevents cluster headaches. Because if that is true, then yeah, we just don’t need the psychedelia at all.

I don’t know how likely that is to be true. The thing that I am especially interested in finding out is if ketanserin also blocks the body buzz quality of DMT. Maybe that is inherently a 5-HT2A receptor-mediated effect. It could also be that BOL-148 just works by a different mechanism of action than DMT. That’s another possibility. So there are a lot of possibilities, but hopefully somebody trying ketanserin plus DMT will allow us to narrow down actually what is happening.

Wrapping Up: The Cluster Free Initiative

With that, just wrapping up: We are soon going to be releasing this initiative called Cluster Free in collaboration with the Organization for the Prevention of Intense Suffering (OPIS) as well as Clusterbusters, both of whom are in the advisory board of the initiative. It’s an initiative incubated and developed at QRI, the Qualia Research Institute. Very much many thanks to Alfredo Parra for taking the initiative to push this forward and really try to make a difference.

Testimonials Request

One of the things that we’re soliciting is video accounts—firsthand video accounts from you guys. If you suffer from cluster headaches or migraines and you tried DMT especially, but any psychedelic works, consider recording a 5-to-10-minute video describing your experience, what made it work, what challenges you encountered along the way. That sort of thing is invaluable to us from a PR perspective, from a utilitarian perspective. We really want to make a big blast of this information and literally turn it into breakthrough therapy in the near future.

I think the case for it going through clinical trials is super strong. As I mentioned, you only need to really show that it’s safe and effective. It is safe. Pure DMT is extraordinarily safe. I don’t know if there’s a single recorded death just from pure DMT. It’s a little bit like marijuana or LSD or mushrooms. It’s just so hard to overdose on it from a physiological danger point of view. Of course, psychological trauma is a different matter. But yeah, physiologically it’s definitely very safe. At the 3-milligram dosage, it’s definitely going to be also psychologically safe.

And effective? That still remains to be seen scientifically, but I am going to bet—I’m going to bet it is effective. It damn well is.

So yeah, I think there’s a really compelling case for actually pushing through these standard mainstream routes of drug acceptance, especially if we find a way of making it slightly more commercially viable—for example, combining with ketanserin.

Call for Collaboration

But then in addition to that—so yeah, of course, if you have experience running clinical trials, you’re in the space, please reach out to us. We are gathering a cluster of people who are committed and see the vision and want to push this forward. So please reach out.

Donation Request

And then, finally: if you like what we are doing, if you like what I do more broadly—the investigations that I do, the videos I put out, the articles that I write, the projects that I lead at QRI, for example, the psychedelic retreats we held in Brazil and Canada, etc.—yeah, consider donating to QRI. Right now it’s actually a really good time for a number of reasons. We’re going to have a fundraiser soon, but in the meantime, it would actually be very helpful for us to cover some expenses. To have some donations now would be a good time. So if you’re in a position to donate to QRI—$5k, $10k would go a long way, at least right now. So just putting it out there.

And also, especially if there’s anything in particular at QRI that you want to support—for example, maybe the thing that you think is the most important is developing techniques for awakening using 5-MeO-DMT or DMT, or precisely something like validating our hypothesis that the brain is a nonlinear optical computer—you can earmark your donation that way. You can say, “Hey, this donation is for your next DMT retreats” or something like that.

And yeah, I promise, I promise we will use your donation for whatever you tell us to. Of course, I prefer if you give us a donation and you trust us that we will allocate it properly. Hopefully all of the content and output and love that we’ve put out showcases that yes, we have a good idea of how to use resources to produce useful information that is broadly beneficial for the world.

But yeah, especially if you are passionate about cluster headache relief, you can earmark it. You can donate to QRI for cluster headache initiatives. You can also donate to the Organization for the Prevention of Intense Suffering and Clusterbusters. I mean, if you have spare resources, this is—I believe with the biggest integrity of my heart—a powerful intervention for the world.

Closing

And with that, thank you so much, everybody. I hope it wasn’t too burdensome to have this conversation about extreme suffering, but yeah, it’s part of the package. I’ll be seeing you soon, talking about other fascinating topics.

Infinite bliss, everybody. May all beings be free from suffering, especially those who are trapped in hell.

Take care everybody. Ciao.

Indra’s Net via Nonlinear Optics: DMT Phenomenology as Evidence for Beamsplitter Holography and Recursive Harmonic Compression

[Epistemic Status: Speculating on a key implementation detail within the paradigm of the Brain as a Non-Linear Optical Computer (BaaNLOC) – specifically, how the optical function of beam splitting could be used to compose the contents of a conscious simulation scene with principles of cel animation and holography. In particular, this may explain both how local phenomenal binding is implemented as well as the uncanny sense of being a multitude that are common on DMT-induced states of consciousness; featured image source]

Alternative Title: One Screen, Many Contributors: Explaining the One + Many nature of Experience with Non-Linear Optical Circuits

Background Readings – and key takeaways of each:

  • The Constructive Aspect of Visual Perception (by Steven Lehar): We learn that vision is a constructive process that uses bottom-up and top-down resonance as its generator. Of special note: a gestalt (when features become “more than the sum of their parts”) has spectral properties: it resonates in a specific way as a combination of frequencies and can click with, interface with, and even drag other gestalts. Waves inside gestalts collide with each other in a way that conveniently (and efficiently) abstracts its symmetries (e.g. how the “reverse grassfire algorithm” can be used to abstract the symmetries of shapes).
  • The Brain as a Non-Linear Optical Computer: Reflections on a 2-Week Jhana Meditation Retreat: Where I introduce the overall picture of BaaNLOC based on phenomenological observations I gathered at a Jhana retreat. The core idea is that the world simulation is rendered using optical elements (cf. Ising Machines: Non-Von Neumann Computing with Non-linear Optics). I hypothesized that there is a trade-off between how much we can experience sensations in a localized way vs. experiencing frequency-domain information. Jhana absorption is akin to pushing all of the information to the frequency domain: you’re a vibration rather than a location. We can hypothesize that the sense of simultaneity and non-locality comes from us being a standing wave pattern trapped in Total Internal Reflection (TIR) in the brain. The quality of experience, especially pertaining to each of the Jhanas, can be described in terms of an optical circuit that modulate the consonance, dissonance, and noise signature of gestalts, each of which is an optical “soliton” within the larger TIR pocket that delimits a moment of experience. Jhana meditation involves, among other things, interacting with gestalts in such a way that you harmonize them, and eventually build up to a level of coherence that allows the entire world simulation to achieve (one of several types of) global coherence.
  • The Electrostatic Brain: How a Web of Neurons Generates the World-Simulation that is You (by Fakhri, Percy, Gómez-Emilsson): “We propose that objects in your world simulation are made of patches in the neuronal lattice with distinct electrostatic parameters. The interaction of light with matter is governed by the material’s electrostatic parameters permittivity and permeability. Light propagates undisturbed through a uniform medium but reflects and refracts when these properties vary spatially, which is the principle behind how lenses manipulate light.” In other words, a theory for how “phenomenal objects” (and gestalts more broadly) acquire their solidity and individuation at the implementation level. Waves inside each gestalt behave differently than “outside” (but still within the world simulation) of them, due to literal electrical properties modulating the speed of wave propagation.
  • DMT and Hyperbolic Geometry: The core ideas to import deal with how DMT hallucinations can be explained in terms of a field of experience with an energy function: the simultaneous maximization of how “recognizable” and how “symmetrical” (both being “energy sinks”) a gestalt is. DMT energizes the world simulation, and the hallucinations we experience are downstream of the system trying to get rid of this excess energy. A psychedelic trip, therefore, is explained in terms of thermodynamics and as an annealing process that may, along the way, favor hyperbolic (and non-Euclidean, broadly) geometry. The world becoming a kind of kale surface (cf. “worldsheet“) is the result of the system “stitching together” an excess number of gestalts (that fail to dissipate quickly; cf. tracer effects). The gestalts are all trying to predict each other in a process of energy minimization that may do some useful compute along the way if we figure out how to harness it properly (cf. Cub Flipper’s recent ideas on the matter).
  • From Neural Activity to Field Computing: The key takeaway here is that we can modulate the topology of a field by parametrizing a network of coupled oscillators in such a way that you can “tune into” the resonant modes of the system and in turn interact with the field in a coherent way. If the field responds to the oscillators in a physical way (e.g. interpreting the oscillators as electrical in nature, and the field as the shape of the magnetic field, as one of many possible examples) attractors of the system of coupled oscillators may in turn instantiate specific and predictable topological structures in the field. The way this is relevant to the current post is that we see how e.g. electric oscillations (in gestalts) can create genuine boundaries in a field and allow entire regions to “behave as one” in turn.
  • Cel Animation as a Key Metaphor to Model DMT Hallucinations: This may be the most important background read – it outlines how both Laser Chess and Cel Animations can be used as system metaphors for how a wave-like non-local experience can interface (and be part of) a system with “classical” local parts. In the case of Laser Chess, we have a game where there is a local “classical” step (moving a piece) and then a non-local “holistic” state (shining the laser and seeing what standing wave pattern emerges as a result). The brain’s “slow” neural activity might be “placing” the classical optical elements as constraints at millisecond-speed, for then a “global” and “near instantaneous” interference pattern that solves the path integral of all possible trajectories within the pocket to take over as a global ultra-parallel medium of compute. In turn, Cel Animation (the way cartoons used to be made; transparent sheets that depict what is changing and leave everything else intact) can be used as a metaphor to describe how “awareness wraps around and moves around” in a field of gestalts. Our world simulation is akin to a projector that shines on a 3D diorama populated with holograms. The experience is the emergent light-field that stabilizes when light is shined on this diorama. Typically our diorama has a clear center, but depending on the kind, alignment, vibration, and symmetries of the gestalts present, more than one, or even no, “phenomenal center” might emerge: the light does not need to converge at a point, even if it usually does.
  • The Emergence of Self-Awareness: Conscious Holography as an Evolved Hardware Accelerator: Finally, this recent video explains how dimensionality reduction implemented at a physical level (with e.g. holograms a quintessential example) could be associated with moments of experience via a precise computational role of consciousness. Namely, we’re conscious because dimensionality reduction in holograms feels like something, and evolution found really good use for this physical process. That is, coordinating information in sensory fields of different dimensionalities in order to construct a coherent internal state that efficiently and accurately encodes both information types. This is reasonable because holographic compressions, at a physical implementation level, are a kind of distributed spatial knowledge that uses path integrals and superposition to encode large amounts of information. We could make the case that at the point of dimensionality reduction is when “reality can meet itself” by collapse in on itself.

Putting it all together: we have a model of moments of experience as a standing wave pattern inside a non-linear optical system. It is conceptually elegant, but still widely unspecified. We have noted how this conceptual framework would solve many philosophical problems while articulating the nature of otherwise extremely puzzling phenomenology (e.g. DMT breakthroughs). What follows is further speculation, specifically on how beam splitters could play a role in this framework. In particular, I’m going to describe and then try to explain the phenomenology of DMT’s autonomous entities as well as Indra’s Net (at the extreme) and then explain how a non-linear optical circuit with the right characteristics could give rise to these corner cases. In fact, as we will see, it makes sense to think of every experience as a kind of Indra’s Net but with significant opaque components. More on this later.

Context

I recently had the chance to talk to Michael Levin and Elan Barenholtz (thanks to Ekkolapto at University of Toronto!) on the topic of phenomenal binding and the Platonic Realm (hear also the conversation I had with Levin last year):

I recommend listening to the whole conversation, but I figured I’d share what I presented at the beginning to establish some context for further discussions. The talk was an interesting challenge for me because I was given exactly 5 minutes to present a case at the beginning of the panel. In general, I love to be challenged to deliver a specific insight or argument on a time limit. Although a fun exercise, I also realize that there is quite a bit of background needed to really get what I’m talking about. So this post will go over both the content of my presentation as well as its further implications. There will be a lot more QRI content on the topic of non-linear optical circuits in relation to consciousness coming in the future.

What Needs to be Explained

Two key phenomenological realities need to be explained. No matter how weird and absurd they may sound (they do happen, as a phenomenon), we need to take them seriously if our theory of consciousness is any good. The key idea we will circle back to is that we can explain this exotic phenomenology using non-linear optics as a substrate (at least conceptually). So, what is it that we ought to explain?

First, is the sense of autonomous entities while on DMT. While 5-MeO-DMT tends to generate a sense of global coherence that hints at Open Individualism, DMT instead tends to feel as if you’re being thrown into a deep ecosystem of rogue mindforms. More so, it is often reported that these entities not only feel like they are _not you_ but they also feel controlled by a variety of different agencies with disparate goals. It is also not the case that these agencies are in agreement about how to interact with you, as oftentimes fierce competition for attention and other cognitive or energetic resources ensues. It is for this reason we like to say DMT pushes you to a “competing clusters of coherence” attractor. More so, each of these clusters seems to have its own agenda and objective function. It often takes quite a bit of negotiating between the “parts” of the organism can “pull together” in one direction during the otherwise fragmented state of DMT intoxication.

And if that wasn’t enough of a mystery, the second is an even stranger but certainly no less real phenomenon: Indra’s Net. This is the feeling and felt sense that “everything reflects everything else”. Many people use to term to refer to an implicit quality of reality: interdependence. But when I use the term in this context, I’m pointing to a very real, very vivid, and very computationally non-trivial state of consciousness. It is _true_ that the state gives you the feeling that it has a lesson, message, implicit insight, etc. to deliver, and that it is that we’re all connected at a deep fractal level somehow, but leaving aside this impression, the immediate phenomenology of Indra’s Net is really something worth exploring and explaining in its own right.

I believe that Indra’s Net is a window into how consciousness works at a fundamental level, and in this essay you will see how we might be able to explain it in terms of non-linear optical circuits. But the deeper insight (note: don’t take a twig from the Dharma Tree, says Rob Burbea, instead go for the big flowers, the big fruits, the jewels of the path) is that perhaps “everything reflects everything else” is not a strange corner case you have to work to arrive at. But on the contrary, the sense that each part of experience has a clear identity, location, and boundary relative to every other part of experience, is itself the strange corner case – you have to twist and torque Indra’s Net just right so that its projection _looks_ like a normal everyday life type of experience. By default, consciousness is profoundly interconnected in overt and explicit ways. If so, a lot of the energy the brain is spending is on keeping the illusion that non-Indra’s Net states are the default somehow.

Another problem is that Indra’s Net sounds so outlandish and incredible that it is easy to dismiss as “recollection or confabulation after the fact”. The epistemological poverty of our predicament is further exacerbated by the fact that people tend to confuse semantic content and phenomenal character, in turn delivering fantastically confused and knotted trip reports.

So, let’s cut to the chase, what is so special about Indra’s Net and how does it actually manifest? Here is the essence of it: any gestalt on your visual/tactile field (which can be synesthetic, and typically is) can be an expression of the whole experience after a certain kind of transformation or information processing pipeline. Let me elaborate. In the classic case where Indra’s Net is expressed as a web of water droplets, then what you will see is that the content of every reflection (the light emitted by each droplet) is itself the whole scene, but transformed. Indeed, it is _what the scene looks like_ from that point of view (more or less). In turn, this is happening to every one of the elements on the scene. Each element is itself expressing what the rest of the scene looks like from its point of view. Each element is taking the whole scene, applying a transformation to it, and then expressing it back into the field for everyone else to see.

This is agnostic to the specific semantic content of the scene (though perhaps not entirely orthogonal, as content and shape are ultimately correlated). You could have an Indra’s Net experience of countless heavenly Jewels reflecting on each other in beautiful ways. Or you could have an experience of looking at hundreds of demon eyes, each one reflecting every other one. Or you could experience something much more computationally crazy, like a maze of mirrors and diffraction rays, where everything reflects everything else in highly non-trivial ways in maze paths you didn’t even know were mathematically possible. The point is that the mind seems to have this attractor state we can broadly point to with the term Indra’s Net, which corresponds to a state in which the geometric content of every gestalt reflects/and is connected to the content of every other gestalt and of the scene as a whole.

The question that naturally arises here is: why do we experience this on DMT? Seriously, why is this a common attractor state? Importantly, the feature that “the whole scene hangs together as an irreducible whole” in which “moving any part results in the whole state shifting and adjusting” is not, predicted, by current computational models of the mind (or is?). What would a theory that predicts Indra’s Net look like?

The core insight I want to share for the time being is that if we allow the whole experience to somehow “project onto itself” a transformed version of itself after underlying non-linear optical filters, then some of these features start to emerge for free.

At the limit, both DMT autonomous entities and Indra’s Net become sort of one and the same (!). In effect, it is not uncommon for the sense of the multiple entities to coalesce into a gigantic god-like hivemind that incorporates many gestalts at multiple scales and it makes it very clear that it is “one and all of them at the same time”. Indeed, one can perhaps re-interpret a lot of classic iconography (e.g. the hundreds of arms of the Hindu Gods) as perhaps a pictographic representation of the phenomenology of Indra’s Net. (See also how the improper stitching together of the holograms can result in misaligned Cronenberg-like DMT Shoggoths, too).

Both deep in a DMT experience, and also at high levels of meditative concentration (cf. hard Jhanas) Indra’s Net is really common. I want to emphasize how this is not a vague poetic metaphor. It is a concrete structure, where the phenomenological “screen” that makes up access consciousness (the part of your experience you can report on) is filled with clusters of agentic constructs (“entities”) that seem to be mutually inspecting and modifying each other. They behave like holographic cel animation layers, arranged with depth and dynamically interacting subcomponents that reflect the whole.

What we want is a conceptual framework that would make DMT autonomous entities as well as Indra’s Net a perfectly natural outcome. Indeed, perhaps even expected and obvious in retrospect. To do this, I will introduce a number of core ideas, all of them orbiting a central one: perhaps our “screen of consciousness” is being “beamed” to multiple semi-independent modules at the same time, each specialized in different aspects of information processing. In turn, these modules transform the beamed image, and then pull it together with the other post-processed images by the other modules, and projects it back onto the original screen. This is reminiscent of recurrent neural networks, non-linear optical networks, but above all, the core idea that intelligent dimensionality reduction is central to a well behaved mind. Let’s dive in!

One Screen, Many Contributors: Explaining the One + Many nature of Experience with Non-Linear Optical Circuits

Non-Linear Optical Circuitry at the core of the current iteration of BaaNLOC. The central screen beams copies of its content to semi-independent modules. Then each module applies learned non-linear optical transformations such as birefringence, diffraction, refraction, etc. The post-processed images are then pulled together, and after a final symmetry group transform (to know how to fit it onto the screen), are re-projected back onto the original screen. The experience that emerges is the steady state standing-wave pattern of Total Internal Reflection (TIR) trapped in the loop. Key idea is that the images projected from each module back to the main screen can interact with each other in a quasi-physical way there.

I start by portraying the overall geometry of a moment of experience, as illustrated by Steven Lehar:

Source: Cartoon Epistemology by Steven Lehar

Consider this “diorama-like shape” that contains phenomenal properties we can point to and discuss. It is deeply interconnected. An experience is not “just” a 2.5D screen of pixels, because something is actively integrating and interrelated all of those pixels under a shared “umbrella”: a point of view, or subject of experience. Whatever the true mathematical object is that corresponds to a moment of experience (cf. qualia formalism), it must be able to connect variables in ways that produce the specific patterns of binding we observe. The patterns of binding must somehow allow us to reconstruct the geometry of the experience as a whole. But the patterns of binding are complex. A cup is not merely a blue object – it has intricate structures like a handle and a floor and perhaps liquid content, features which are all put together into a coherent multi-level representation for us to interact with. Indeed, we have to ultimately provide a mathematical structure rich enough to model and account for all types of phenomenal binding. Worth mentioning is QRI’s long-standing idea of modeling experiences as graphs with nodes that represent qualia values and edges that represents the flow of attention. In this case, the nodes you attend to are salient due to reasons having to do with graph centrality (cf. PageRank). Why? Because e.g. PageRank tracks the probability of landing on a given node if you are doing a kind of random walk from node to node using the directed edge weights as probability of transitioning. The nodes with high PageRank are those for which “the flow of attention” leads to lakes where it pools and concentrates.

As explained already, we suspect that the psychedelic sense that “everything is connected to everything else” may not be an anomaly, but rather a feature of experience that is always present, only rarely made explicit. This kind of PageRank of attention is always ongoing. The geometry of experience seems to be a kind of stable equilibria that results from systems observing each other and creating representations with relative distances to each other. Naturally, experience is “self-reflective” for this reason (and not only due to introspection!). But Indra’s Net is a deeper kind of structure that is still way more interconnected than e.g. PageRank would suggest. We need something new:

The core idea is that the non-linear optical circuit diagram above might capture some of the more exotic and intricate aspects of phenomenology (as mentioned: autonomous entities and Indra’s Net). The sketch you see at the start of this section (“One Screen, Many Contributors: Explaining the One + Many nature of Experience with Non-Linear Optical Circuits”), aims to capture key structural insights for the generation of moments of experience, which beam splitters, birefringence, and image-teleporting TV stones (cf. “How does Television Stone Work?“; Ulexite) feeding a recursive optical loop. This loop allows many “sub-agents” to see the same field, alter it independently, and feed their changes back into the whole in real time. The equilibrium state of this process is what we experience as a moment of consciousness.

In the recorded discussion, Michael Levin offered an elegant metaphor for how self-organizing systems can “pull” you toward them, where constraints in the medium act like attractors and make parts of the problem solve themselves once enough structure is in place. One of his example was a triangle: if the fittest shape for a given problem involves a certain triangle (e.g. a triangular alga needs to have three specific angles at its corners to succeed in certain navigation task), you evolve the first angle, then the second, and the third is automatically determined by the laws of geometry (a free gift from Euclidean geometry; or the geometry of the network of relationships between the parts, more broadly, when we talk about intrinsic geometry). This kind of regularity is an example case for how complex systems can bootstrap themselves, where knowing part of the whole lock in the rest: symmetry reduces degrees of freedom, and constraint propagation allows the global pattern to self-assemble without exhaustive search. In Levin’s framework and worldview, these “free lunches” live in pattern-space or morphogenesis space (as we’ll see), so that once your system points to the right place, the rest of the pattern ingresses “into the physical”.

Indra’s Net might be one of these patterns. The state of consciousness where everything _explicitly_ reflects everything else, from this point of view, does not have to be built in its entirety from the bottom up; once parts of it crystallize, and high-level symmetries are locked in place, the rest already knows how to relax into its attractor. It’s worth mentioning Levin also pointed out that in his work with Chris Fields he extends the logic of navigation in pattern-space, to “morphogenesis space”. That is, the configuration space in which cells navigate to build and repair anatomies. Applying least action laws (perhaps the true building blocks of reality? Or the true underlying laws of reality?) not to physical three-dimensional space (which may itself be emergent) but to the implicit geometries that shape biological growth and repair, may explain how an organism navigates its possible self-organization and converges on an energy minima that is very wholistic in nature.

In the toy model I presented, a non-linear optical circuit containing beam splitters, birefringence, and image-teleporting TV stones feeds a recursive loop that allows many “sub-agents” to see the same field, alter it independently, and feed their changes back into the whole. The equilibrium of this process corresponds to a moment of consciousness: it’s the topologically closed standing-wave pattern that emerges out of the non-linear optical circuit reaching a point of stability – and then what it is like to be it perhaps corresponding to “the superposition of all points of view” within it (see Cube Flipper’s recent efforts to describe this way of “reading off” an experience out of a physical system).

The energy function locally rewards gestalts that succeed at being explanatory, meaning they can anticipate, compress, and model the behavior of other gestalts. This generates an ecosystem in which gestalts compete and cooperate by predicting one another, and some develop the capacity to swallow the entire scene and then re-express it in transformed form. The medium where these interactions occur (the phenomenal screen) is not a passive display (common misconception) but an active site of computation, where interferences between gestalts are identified and workshopped. It also plays the role of being a “metric” or “gauge” for the other various gestalts. The screen gives gestalts a kind of “radar” so that by emitting waves they can find each other “in 3D”. From this perspective, experience involves lifting the content of the field into higher dimensions (internal states of the modules), applying transformations there, and then re-projecting it back as a coherent standing wave onto 3D (or 2.5D). In fact, several semi-independent modules doing this in parallel and then responding to each other’s transformations. The result is often deeply interdependent and “enmeshed”, irreducible-seeming, as the process transforms experiences recursively mid-flight and converges on gestalts that get along well with each other, are explanatory, and can predict sensory input.

Beam Splitters

Let’s try to imagine this more concretely. First, let’s talk about beam splitters. A beam splitter is typically a piece of glass or plastic that allows a certain percentage of the light through and reflects the rest. They’re one of the pieces in the game Khet 2.0 (a variant of Laser Chess), where the laser effectively splits in two and has more chances to do damage to the other’s Kind (or Pharaoh). This multiplies the number of beams, and at least in some arrangements, can lead to combinatorial explosions. Beam splitters, I suspect, are ubiquitous in our brain’s information processing pipeline. The ability to carbon-copy a gestalt so that you can work on it in multiple streams in parallel is extremely empowering, and no doubt a core step in any serious implementation of non-linear optical computation. Think about the phenomenology of shifting around the content of a working memory module. Doesn’t it feel like you’re copy/pasting information from one part of your field to another? Beam splitters are also, I reckon, a key optical component of our world simulation that allows for parallel processing streams to get unified into the coherent experience we mistake for a single “simple” witness.

Teleprompters allow you to have “split vision” so that you can look at the camera while you read your speech. (cf. DIY Teleprompter). They’re a kind of highly functional beam/image splitters.


In an effort to making the above more relatable, let’s talk about a really cool invention: the holographic broadcasting system. It doesn’t exist yet, but it could. It should, in fact. For aesthetic, social, and computational reasons,. What is this I’m talking about? Check this out:

The Holographic Broadcasting System

Imagine this: in front of you is a special table. A table that shows an image. There are hundreds of other tables like it and they are all connected to each other. When you place something on the table, it appears as a hologram in every other table like it. You can use this to play board games with people in other countries in real time, or for strategizing, delivering presentations, and even solving a maze as a team.

Here is the twist: the object that you place on the table can itself be an object that holds a transformed image of the table. Say, the object you place on the table is an iPad that shows what the table looks like from your point of view (e.g. your glasses have cameras that beam data to the iPad). You can even do projection mapping on the table and overlay a digitally transformed version of what it looks like on top of itself.

Projection mapping: you use a model of the 3D scene so that you can “paint it” with a projector that displays a video of the very scene it’s illuminating, after processing it with digital tools.

Each person with access to (a parallel version of) the table might specialize in a different kind of transformation: some specialize in adding edge detectors that highlight the corners and sharp angles of what’s in it. Others perhaps do color enhancement. Yet another one does shape rotation, where it overlays rotated images of the table (or a region thereof) on top of itself. The result is that the table is a live hologram that gets to be edited in real time by many different groups of people, each looking for something different, and capable of emphasizing different features of this collective work of art.

But here’s what makes this system truly extraordinary: each hologram carries its own unique spectral signature (remember how you can do analogue Fourier transforms in optical circuits!). From the point of view of the system, each gestalt/hologram is a kind of molecule with distinct “vibratory modes” that interact with other nearby gestalts that share such frequencies. When an edge detector sharpens a visual element, it doesn’t just change the shape, it also “stamps” a vibratory signature, so to speak, onto the hologram metadata for the system to work with. From the point of view of the system as a whole, may at first seem like a simple object carries rich spectral (i.e. frequency/vibration in addition to position) information. Whether holograms in the table “get along with each other” is a function of how they resonate together, as a group (with other gestalts), and as a whole (how the whole state can self-harmonize, or not, with the presence of such features). Collectively, the local and global vibrations define how the system “wants” to settle, and how each region interferes and interacts with neighboring holograms.

Importantly, I think this is happening all the time. What is different about high dose DMT or hard Jhanas with prominent Indra’s Net phenomenology is the extent to which individual gestalts express information about the whole experience. Consider the spectrum that goes from a completely dark and uninteresting room, to a room that is filled with parallel mirrors, beam splitters, diffraction gratings, polarizers, etc. What the room looks like doesn’t change very much as a function of lighting and head position in the first room. But in the second room, subtle changes in lighting can change the look and feel of the whole scene, as well as subtle changes in head positioning or even direction to which the eyes are pointed. In both cases the rooms are ultimately made of the same kind of “material” (atoms, physically speaking; qualia, subjectively speaking). But the second room has implicit connections and relationships that makes it highly sensitive to things like angle of lighting. The punch line, as it were, is that both physical systems are kinds of Indra’s Net, at least in a raw physical sense: every part of the dark room does indeed reflect every other part, it’s just that the information has been scrambled and largely lost. But just because the materials are not reflective or smooth doesn’t mean that on a deep physical level we don’t find a web of interdependent physical fields giving rise to the room as a whole as a “point of stability” of the system. This requires “everything reflecting everything else”. It’s just that many of these reflections aren’t very interesting or coordinated! Yet they are always there.

Likewise, even very boring and prosaic “contents of the visual field” (say, a banana, an orange… a stim toy) without any “trippiness”, I would argue, do implicitly contain the “everything reflects everything else” quality. When you see a banana contextualized by being next to an orange, the very _meaning_ of the banana changes. It becomes, in look and feel, a “banana next to an orange” rather than a “banana plain and simple”. More so, now that this contextual relationship has been established, we see the same is the case for the orange. And once more, with recursion, we find that the banana starts to look like a “banana that’s next to an orange, which is next to a banana” and so on. In principle this sounds redundant. But it is not. On DMT trips, this “transitivity of context” may in fact break down. So, for example, you might find yourself contextualizing the banana by an orange, but the orange might feel like it’s coming from a space that _is not_ contextualized by the banana. At least not directly. It’s often as if the various gestalts on DMT could exist in semi-independent geometric spaces that only with joint attention can actually interact with one another. Thus, the Indra’s Net quality of experience is in some sense much more robust in “normal everyday life” relative to the depths of an ayahuasca journey. And that is because under normal circumstances we do in fact have that our phenomenal objects properly contextualize each other in a way that achieves closure.

On high doses of DMT, it is possible for the entirety of one’s experience to be “compressed” into a triangle and then having that triangle projected onto our experience. You see how this would be a rather unusual and special kind of mathematical object, right? We’re dealing with a situation in which materializing a projection of the whole space onto a part of it radically changes the nature of the geodesics of the space. The triangle becomes a shortcut between various points that find their shortest distance by jumping into it. Now, in really exotic states, when multiple parallel streams are re-projecting the whole experience back onto itself after doing unique transformations to it (say, one “rolls up the experience into a tube”, another one “turns it into the surface of a sphere”, and yet another one “does this weird Hopf-fibration-like foliation of the space”) you have the emergence of phenomenal spaces that are extremely interconnected and will for the most part be a once-in-a-life-time encounter, as the combinatorial explosion of these feedback processes is so large we often have no hope of reconstructing specific and weird corner case.

Harmonic Simplification

Hundreds of spectral holograms can coexist in the shared screen at once. They do not need to collide directly. They are controlled by different modules, but they do “collapse” and get pushed into the same screen, which tries to reconcile/compile them into a single “point of view”. There are two steps. First the system tries to flatten all of the holograms in the main screen. Then the system lifts all of the subsystems that didn’t find a clear fit with each other into a higher-dimensional work space where the more fined-grained information is computed (and where many more kinds of rotations are available to do so). This way, the screen, in light of the multiple commenting parallel streams that “lift it”, can dynamically transform in much more general ways than what the screen itself could afford geometrically on its own. In that space their spectra interact more directly: modes beat against modes and compatible components find strange projections (along higher dimensional transformations) that allow them to click together. The screen’s own low frequency harmonics act as a constraint (they amplify the 2D and 3D symmetries found in among the gestalts as seen presented in the screen, cf. our computational model of cessation) and work as selection pressures for patterns that fit the logic of 3D space. Anything that persists must couple to, and be consistent with, the global modes of the screen (imposing familiar geometry), as well as the constraints being carried in/imported by each of the semi-independent modules.

When a stable configuration that ties together multiple other gestalts in a clean composition is found, the circuit produces a simplified gestalt that stands in for the group. In some cases it replaces it, but more typically the “summary representation” works as a kind of leader of the gestalts it’s summarizing. Alas, all gestalts are decaying, so the visible and impactful ones are only the most recent summaries. The summary gestalt also carries spectral content that matters for downstream coupling (how to “get along with the current screen as a whole”) and drops detail that would only introduce new conflicts. That surrogate then re-enters the loop as a new gestalt with its own spectral signature. The process is recursive, which makes most of experience be a strange process where summaries compose with other summaries, and the screen converges toward a coherent standing wave that is both globally coherent and locally consistent. The “infinite reflections in the eyes of beings” inside Indra’s Net e..g. “spider eyes” (eyes reflecting eyes, etc.) move in a way that is both consistent with the local geometry of the main screen (of access consciousness) as well as with the geometry of the network of connections and reflections. When you move an eye in an Indra’s Net, you move the _whole_ Net.

On ordinary mindstates gestalts have short half-lives, so the loop clears quickly and the screen doesn’t tend to have long-range temporal self-interactions. High-energy conditions such as high dose DMT or hard Jhanas extend those half-lives (cf. Tracer Effects). More gestalts remain in the screen for longer, more summaries are formed, and more couplings between gestalts become possible. The result is a scene where parts model each other and the whole and then re-express it in transformed form that interact with one another. This is the functional core of Indra’s Net phenomenology as I currently see it. And I believe we can have it come about naturally in such an optical circuit.

The Multitude Behind the Screen

We typically think the screen of consciousness is like this: you think you are just one witness looking at it. But what if it’s actually being broadcast to hundreds of different locations at once? And every one of those locations has a specialized intelligence that knows how to identify faces/mechanisms/connections on the screen and overlay that information on top of it for everyone else to see?

Neither recurrence nor resonance can solve the phenomenal binding problem, but if consciousness is a standing wave pattern trapped in a TIR pocket, then beam splitters that allow different modules to work simultaneously into a shared space just might.

From Lehar’s Cartoon Epistemology

Each of these specialized processing locations generates its own “interpretation of the scene”. Effectively, taking the shared space and applying specialized filters (try to resonate with it in a bunch of ways and see what sticks!), in turn modifying it in real time and contributing additional gestalts to the collective mix. Face recognition modules stamp facial harmonics onto visual patterns. Motion detection systems add their characteristic rhythms. Mood modules add jitter or laminar flow to attention. Memory systems contribute resonant modes that connect current perceptions to stored patterns. Emotional processing centers overlay affective spectral information that colors the entire scene (cf. citta).

The beam splitter is multimodal. The signal gets split and is sent simultaneously to somatic processing modules, auditory systems, and other sensory domains. Each domain receives the same fundamental holistic information (the _entire_ experience!) but processes it according to its own characteristic geometry, topology, and harmonic features. There’s likely a master screen that combines these three primary modalities (incl. visual, somatic, auditory) each contributing their own spectral signatures to the unified conscious experience.

Crucially, this conceptual framework might articulate the phenomenology we observer in how tactile-visual synesthesia works through spectral principles (cf. Roger Thisdell on Pure Perception). Synesthetic states can be thought of as “solitons” of the system: self-reinforcing wave packets that maintain their coherence while propagating their spectral information to the rest of the field across modalities. These solitons resonate with one another and with the broader spectral ecosystem in the screen, integrating interactions, and in turn lock together the gestalts contributed by different modules into stable multi-modal gestalts.

The sense of “Autonomous Entities”, and even more strikingly, the feeling of being a multitude on DMT might come from this mechanism becoming more “transparent”. The screen is always broadcast to many locations, but at baseline only a few have edit rights, with a strong and smart filter gating what reaches the authoritative version. On DMT many (perhaps most?) streams gain editing privileges at once, so an ecosystem of patterns grows in the shared space and coordinates through the screen without the intermediate central organizer (ego?) filtering who talks to who. This results in complex subagents interacting through the medium that can plot for and against you. Thus framework that accounts for Indra’s Net also explains Autonomous Entities: the competing clusters of coherence on DMT form hierarchical networks that bootstrap semi-parallel agency. As Steven Lehar hypothesizes (personal communication), these entities are facets of yourself: the central screen is being beamed to separate modules, each “witnesses” the whole scene, processes it, and then comments by beaming transformed gestalts back to the screen. Under normal conditions few streams are active; with DMT’s coupling kernel you may be “opening half the streams at once” (chaotically and hierarchically), creating literally “more witnesses of your experience.” Streams come together that usually don’t co-exist, and must thus negotiate how agency will be distributed among them.

A bit like the kid behind a reporter saying “mom! I’m on tv!” – many subagents can now broadcast their existence to the whole organism and seek like-minded shards to work on (artistic? political? cosmic?) projects with. Not all the shards understand each other’s communication style, so there is a lot of cross-talk that goes unrecognized by the whole yet is happening beneath the surface.

This way, the entities we encounter can be thought of as different parts of yourself gaining editing privileges on a shared space whose control room is usually locked and safeguarded. It is a multitude in the same way that you’re always already a multitude. But you’re usually following an algorithm that prevents “multiple parts talking at once”; with DMT that system is gone.

The Tracer Effect in Light of the Hologram Collective

As briefly touched upon already, on DMT (and other psychedelics/exotic states of consciousness), sensations (and gestalts) don’t decay at the same rate as normal. Every sensation you experience tends to flicker at a high frequency and linger for a while (depending on dose, could be over several seconds). These “tracers” hang around as afterimages that flicker characteristically fast at the 10-40hz range typically as they interact with one another. When the process that effectively works as a “compression engine” (gestalts summarizing pre-existing gestalts) tries to replace a cluster of gestalts with their simplified proxy, the older ones are still present and spectrally active (meaning, their vibrations still condition the screen and one another). The screen now contains both the compressed summary AND its constituent parents, so the next compression cycle captures the recursive echoes of patterns that should have vanished under normal circumstances (cf. don’t look at cauliflowers while on DMT!). It doesn’t take much imagination to see how this could lead to “fractal-like” patterns.

Overall, this creates a spectral feedback loop, where each new compression inherits more and more afterimages from previous cycles (until it reaches a dose-dependent homeostatic level). Instead of an orderly hierarchy of representations with conventional order, you get a sprawling pattern of self-referential holograms and time-loops, each quoting fragments (and partial impressions) of earlier generations, all resonating and cross-modulating each other. The compression engine, as it were, starts feeding on its own history, creating recursive patterns that reference themselves in increasingly complex ways. One of the key ingredients for the fractal quality of Indra’s Net!

Collective Harmony in Emergent Gestalts

Finally, any discussion of this process would be incomplete without at least mentioning valence. Individual holograms both float independently and they organize themselves into gestalt collectives. These collectives develop their own characteristic resonant modes, creating new spectral patterns that can influence the entire system from the top down. When you recognize a face, you are doing more than combining features such as eyes, nose, and mouth. Really, the face is a higher order gestalts: it is a collective interlocked “metagestalt” that has genuine causal power over how subsequent processing goes. The gestalts that make it up compromise a little on their own characteristic frequencies so that they can interlock as a group and genuinely form something more (and different) than the mere superposition of the parts. Importantly, each gestalt (of any order) tends to have both an intrinsic valence as well as a valence in relation to the other gestalts present. I would posit the intrinsic valence is the result of its internal consonance, dissonance, noise signature (CDNS) of the gestalt. Namely, how would this vibrate if it were the only element in the screen? Whereas valence in relation to other gestalts is the result of mutual consonance, dissonance, and noise between the gestalts.

Indra’s Net valence tends to be pretty extreme. Usually positive (or very positive), but at times negative or very negative. Yes, it is likely the case that if you want to pack as much consonance (mystical choruses, interdimensional massages, etc.) as possible in a finite volume like our screen of consciousness, probably creating a complex web of fractal connections allows you to maximize the number of pleasant relationships. Alas, be warned that fractal dissonances lurk in Indra’s Net too, and a “fractured” not quite complete Indra’s Net can be really disconcerting in some ways. It’s possible that peak positive valence resides in minimal-information-content experiences (as Michael Johnson’s Symmetry Theory of Valence posits), so high-energy high-symmetry states like 5-MeO-DMT are more likely to be leads for peak pleasure states that those catalyzed by DMT or similar. In either case, both the valence (and specifically aesthetic!) value as well as computational significance of Indra’s Net keeps it in the short list of most interesting states to study.

Discussion and Conclusions

Let’s recap. In our non-linear optical circuit, each iteration runs the same loop: the screen copies the whole scene to many modules, they transform their copies, the returns are then projected back onto the screen, and what fits with everything else stays. This iteration-by-iteration “handoff” from each of the modules and the screen as a whole gives continuity where small overlaps between iterations keep motion smooth. The system tends to a few stable objects because it keeps spectra that cooperate with each other and lets go of the rest. The screen is not (just!) a display (!), because it turns out to be where useful compute happens. Namely, where different modules can see the work of each other in real time, and negotiate together how to transform the scene in order to both fit the constraints of the screen as well as of each other.

Radical state changes affect how this loop behaves. With altered coupling dynamics, streams running at their own speed can lock to one another in the presence of strong kernel changes (e.g. when the “DMT coupling kernel” is applied indiscriminately to many systems at once). With tracers, the feedback intensifies across iterations and the negotiation becomes visible on the screen: edges, colors, textures, posture, points of view, trying to fit each with other. By default this tends towards hyperbolic geometry (as the gestalts drift into a more relaxed metric so that all of their idiosyncratic distances to one another can be embedded in some space and the gestalts get stitched together). But even more interestingly, when many modules hold the whole scene at once and write back versions that still predict it, you get Indra’s Net: each patch shows the whole through its own lens, and pulling on any part pulls on the rest too. When more streams get edit rights at the same time in tandem with the tracer effects, the modules negotiate domains of influence by both communicating through the screen and developing agent-like qualities. They all see the same broadcast, process it in their own way, and comment on it by projecting their gestalts back onto the screen. They feel alien because the usual gate that merges commentaries is relaxed, so their “signatures” stay distinct and you can watch them interact and develop new kinds of languages mid-flight.

We are in early days of BaaNLOC, but I am optimistic that it won’t take long for us to be able to code simulations of this optical circuit (and many variants) and then test whether they generate recognizably-DMT-like dynamics. From playing with toy models (to be released soon), I think we’re on track. But much remains to be done. Stay tuned 🙂

In-Flight Entertainment: Metta, SU(3), Flat Earth

[Epistemic Status: playful, informal travel log]

How I spent the 11 hour flight from London to San Francisco just now (apparently flying over Iceland and Greenland, if the map on the little screen in front of me was to be believed):

In essence, three interconnected things:

  1. Metta meditation (“unconditional love for all beings”),
  2. SU(3), and
  3. Flat Earth

First of all, doing metta on a flight is always a good idea. Radiating lovingkindness from the sky is beautiful (whether we live in a Flat Earth or Round Earth, metta still radiates spherically at the speed of light). By doing metta on a flight you get to “touch” a lot more beings (or more of “being”, from a non-dual point of view) through the sheer diversity of physical proximity you get to experience (did I mention we flew over Iceland?).

But I’ve done metta on flights in the past. What was special this time around?

I watched a lecture on “The Strong Nuclear Force as a Gauge Theory” (go Richard Behiel!) that left me thinking about how to modify Kuramoto systems to incorporate QCD features.

In practice, thinking about this, combined with the metta, meant I was essentially playing around with heart shapes in my mind & energy body for 8 of those hours.

Imagining a big heart at the center of reality. Imagining a small heart at the center of reality. Filling it with metta. Imagining a big metta-filled heart rotating clockwise. Imagining a big metta-filled heart rotating counter-clockwise. Getting smaller and larger.

And then in 3D… a heart that grows and rotates and shrinks and changes orientation, and reflects itself (and sometimes looks like the Endless Knot when it does so from a certain angle).

Now imagine a field of hearts. Each point has a 3D heart. It’s ok if it’s a symbol. Eventually it should be abstract: just the qualia of love. But for now, imagining a heart is helpful. Each point has a heart that can rotate, reflect, grow, and even “invert” itself.

Let the hearts touch each other.

By which I mean, let their phase angles become entangled with their neighbors. Create a gigantic field of hearts spinning however they want… so long as unitary and Hermitian. For the SU(3) part. We want strong hearts (by which I mean, capable of emulating the Strong Force).

I was a bit sleep deprived and overclocked (fun fact: when they ask you: “coffee or tea?” you can say “both, please!” and you’ll get two cups, one of each – must clarify: do not make a mixture of the two, or the math will get messed up), so things were a bit conceptually fuzzy and not quite coherent enough to my sober taste. But it was good qualia engineering in line with a Glass Bead Game aesthetic.

I kept thinking: Every rotation is a sequence of shears. A well-coordinated rotation feels good. Poorly done, and you get uneven sheers. Shearing is potentially scary. So shear carefully. That’s why emergent geometric transformation from the superposition of harmonic amplitudes (think degenerate eigenmodes used as a basis for rotation) is of hedonic significance. Only when you coordinate well can you avoid unnecessary shears and jump straight to a proper rotation. If asymmetrically “shearing the fabric of reality” is to be “unkind” to it, SU(3) is the way by which metta is baked in at the base level of phenomenal space.

How does Flat Earth come into play? I started the flight with the question: “how would a von Neumann type justify belief in Flat Earth?” (how I got to that question… I can’t quite remember, and it was probably a followup to a politically incorrect question I won’t touch in public anyway). And I got all kinds of beautiful recreational metaphysics confabulations during the flight. Things involving Donald Hoffman’s take on the nature of reality mixed with abstract cuts of other people’s in-flight movie-watching entertainment experiences (binging classics like Zoolander and Addams Family Values is a perfectly valid, alternative, way to spend your 11 hours, which is what my neighbors cheerfully chose to do instead of messing with SU(3)-rotating imaginary hearts). The main thing being: we could potentially come up with a model of reality that accommodates a truly Flat Earth if we take into account the multiple timelines of the multiverse as part of the geometric metric of intersubjective spacetime itself – only on a “given history of the universe” the world appears round, but that’s only something that happens to be the case from a specific subjective point of view that “glues together” enough perspectives that are consistent-enough to cause a kind of “narrative closure” on the sense of reality. Gravity and the center of mass is emergent from the many frames of reference / points of view that are integrated into a stream of consciousness. But in reality, at the base, the geometry is perfectly flat and Euclidean, like a Lattice QCD (ok, taking a poetic license here, bear with me).

The Flatness of the Field of Hearts seems to be indeed something that gives it high valence. Implementing lawful energy-preserving (for a certain notion of energy) transformations on a field of metta was especially delightful. The more detailed the imagination of this phenomenon, the stronger the seeming neural field annealing that would result of it.

I’ll leave you with a quick vibe-coded reconstruction of this in-flight meditation entertainment experience. No drugs involved (except for a coffee+tea mixture), just strong meditation and imagination.

Enjoy, and please keep sending metta while flying <3

DMT for Cluster Headaches: Aborting and Preventing Extreme Pain with Tryptamines and Other Methods

“If we lived in a really sane society with a strong compassionate streak, every building would have something like a ‘Break in case of fire’ box… only this one would read ‘Break in case of cluster headache.’ Inside you’d find a pre‑charged DMT vape pen. That would be really nice.”

Announcement: Do you have experience using psychedelics to treat cluster headaches? Want to support science and advocacy in this area? Submit your personal and/or professional testimonial to our upcoming “ClusterFree” Open Letter initiative.


Sitting Down with Cluster Busters at Psychedelic Science 2025

One of the highlight moments for me at Psychedelic Science 2025 in Denver this June was conducting an interview for Bob Wold, founder of Cluster Busters, and Joe Stone, and Joe McKay who work alongside Bob in patient support and advocacy.  Our conversation covered a lot of ground, but I had one key strategic goal in mind: document, in their own words, why the humble DMT vape pen looks like a once‑in‑a‑generation breakthrough for the most painful condition that medicine has ever encountered.

“With a regular vape pen it’s usually one inhalation. Thirty seconds later the pain is gone. I hear a click in the middle of my brain and the attack is just off.” —Bob Wold

Their story plugs directly into QRI’s ongoing attempt to map the upper reaches of experience (QRI has the long-standing mission of mapping the state-space of consciousness, reverse engineer valence, and reduce suffering at scale). Our logarithmic scales of pleasure and pain shows that as one climbs up the pain (or pleasure) scales, phenomenal intensity rises far higher than common sense anticipates. The Heavy‑Tailed Valence hypothesis extends that insight to society at large and seeks to question the validity of current econometric approaches to collective wellbeing (cf. QALYs) in light of the fact that the extremes are not properly represented. From where we stand, it seems that a handful of wildly intense states do most of the moral damage (or good). Cluster headaches live in that fat tail, which is precisely why a 30‑second fix like DMT matters so much; perhaps as big of a collective hedonic breakthrough as, say, the discovery of anesthesia (in aggregate).

Put bluntly, if we care about total suffering, we need to care about cluster headaches. The time is now.


Interview Highlights Pertaining to DMT

  • DMT as an acute rescue
    One lungful (where the instructions typically say “three full breaths”) ends most attacks in under a minute. A second puff a minute later covers nearly all the rest. No tolerance shows up (acutely or chronically) which allows patients to repeat the dose whenever necessary.
  • Low psychedelic burden
    The dose is about a quarter of a psychedelic hit; enough to see some color enhancement but not enough for significant “trippiness”. Patients describe “a mild two‑beer buzz” or “the room takes on a golden tint” or “faint auras appear.” The mild level of psychedelia needed for this treatment makes bedside use practical, even for parents who need to stay functional the day after.
  • Why it beats psilocybin and LSD in the heat of battle
    Psilocybin and LSD still shine for cycle prevention, taken every five days, but they work on a timescale that makes them impractical for acute events. DMT is for the here‑and‑now (note Eleusinia founder says DMT also interrupt cycles according to her work at the retreat center). Joe Stone calls it “a game changer” because he can abort a 2AM ethical emergency (a cluster) and fall back asleep within 10 minutes. No need to have an expensive psychotherapy, a professional sitter, or trip killers on hand, let alone having to book a whole day to trip.
  • A hunch about endogenous DMT
    Bob’s shares his intuitive working model for how cluster headaches work (to be refuted or confirmed by science): an attack begins when natural DMT in the brain dips below a threshold (why do we even have DMT in our brains to begin with?). He hazards the guess that a quick DMT top‑up pulls the breaks and re‑establishes homeostasis. Others suggest that melatonin abnormalities in cluster patients add plausibility to his view, given the biochemical link between melatonin and endogenous tryptamine synthesis.
  • Pain drives the psychiatric condition, not the other way around
    One key insight I wanted to make sure to get on the record: chronic physical agony breeds depression, anxiety, and PTSD‑like flashbacks. Fix the pain and the mental distress often dissolves; no need for heroic doses or eight‑hour therapy sessions (as with e.g. psilocybin for depression specifically). Cultural over-emphasis on mental health as _the_ thing to treat with psychedelics might make sense from the point of view of a slowly expanding Overton Window; but the big hedonic payouts (freedom from hellish states of consciousness) are likely concentrated in their application to the reduction of extreme physical pain (see also).

Why This Matters

Alfredo Parra’s quantitative analysis suggests that cluster headaches may contribute more net misery than migraines, cancer pain, or even major depressive disorder once intensity is included (and a proper long-tail model and Monte Carlo simulations are taken into accont). Effective Altruist “pleasure-bean‑counters” (I say this affectionately!) please take note: extremely nasty but “rare” states can dominate the integral, and need urgent consideration.

From a consciousness‑research angle, the interview is another data point for why direct phenomenological investigation should guide ethics; here, patients, confronted with the reality of their own phenomenology, themselves have again clearly pioneered the treatment all the while mainstream research (unsurprisingly) slept through five decades of drug war.

Closing Thoughts

Imagine a fire‑alarm box on every hospital wall that reads “Break glass in case of cluster headache.” Inside we find a sober-looking, very boring but perfectly functional, pre‑filled DMT cartridge that delivers reliable 3mg hits (enough to feel a light buzz, not enough to trip significantly – certainly far short of any dose needed for entity contact or alien abduction experiences). This isn’t science fiction; it is what the data we’re seeing support.  Freedom from one of the most extreme demonic forces on Earth is, counterintuitively… Spice. Let’s shorten the path from patient innovation to standard‑of‑care and, in the process, erase one of the darkest corners of conscious experience forever. I believe we can achieve a Cluster-Free World within a few years if we put our minds and hearts to the task.

Hallucinations are not a problem at the doses we have people use and that seem to work the best, which are much smaller than a recreational dose. We aren’t recommending people take doses that will have them playing cards with a deer (you can’t trust them!). The doses are small (e.g. 1.5g of mushrooms). You’re supposed to get to about the “giggle”. Get to the “giggle point” and you’re good to go.Suicide or Psychedelics, Bob Wold at Horizons 2009


Resources and Further Reading:

How You Can Contribute:

  • Donate to Cluster Busters
  • Donate to QRI (earmark for “Cluster Headache Research and Advocacy”)
  • Donate to OPIS (Organization for the Prevention of Intense Suffering)
  • Share your testimonial if you’ve experienced relief through psychedelic therapy: Submit Here

Stay tuned for QRI’s upcoming Open Letter advocating for psychedelic access in treating severe pain conditions, the ClusterFree worldwide initiative.

Summer Travel Plans for 2025: Psychedelic Science, ASSC, Borderland

Hi everyone!

This week I’m in Denver for Psychedelic Science 2025 🙂

(the Psychedelic Science hero this year floating the relevance of non-linear optics as piece of the puzzle for psychedelic action? Perhaps see: 1, 2 – featured animation is from QRI collaborator Bijan Fakhri in the first link)

I’m going to be hosting a little get-together at The Dancers on Friday at noon, joined by Alien Insect (i.e. Andrew R Gallimore, writer of Alien Information Theory and Reality Switch Technologies) who will be eager to hear your entity contact stories (yes, even the unpleasant bits). 🙂

Call it a QRI Schelling Point: It’s for people interested in consciousness from a Qualia Research Institute angle. That is, efforts to map out the state-space of consciousness, algorithmically reduce psychedelic effects, describe the geometry of hallucinations, reverse engineering the correspondence between the shape and valence of an experience, and organizing Manhattan Projects of Consciousness-like gatherings with math, physics, meditation, and visual arts people to identify the equations behind psychedelic visuals, and so on; see also: psychedelic cryptography – secret messages only people high on LSD can read.

The Dancers are hard to miss. Find them right outside the convention center, between Champa str. and N. Speer blvd. They are gigantic.

Note: One of the key meetings I’m having at this conference will be with Bob Wold, the founder of Clusters Busters. When I was writing the Logarithmic Scales of Pleasure and Pain (see academic publication, h/t Chris Percy) in 2019 I stumbled upon various anecdotes that DMT at sub-hallucinogenic doses is capable of aborting (and then preventing) cluster headaches for a significant fraction of sufferers. Cluster headaches top the charts of painful conditions, and if aborting/preventing them can be safely and reliably done with DMT (and other psychedelics) then this might be one of the most promising directions for the suffering-focused wing of Effective Altruism (and anyone who cares about the true “amount of suffering” and how to reduce it). QRI collaborator and EA veteran Alfredo Parra has been working on quantifying the global burden of intense suffering, and concludes that there is a wide range of parameters for which cluster headaches turn out to cause more aggregate suffering than far more common conditions (e.g. migraines). Thus, along with a few other high-impact suffering-reduction interventions, at QRI we think that decriminalizing substances like DMT for painful conditions, and fostering education and access to them for cluster headache patients in particular, might be one of the most cost-effective ways of reducing the world’s suffering burden. That is, of course, alongside increasing the availability and adoption of other successful therapies (such as oxygen, for many). We are going to launch an Open Letter about this that we will disseminate strategically very soon, so stay tuned (I’ll ask you to sign it if you will!).

Importantly: if you or someone you know suffer from cluster headaches (or any other chronic pain condition that responds to psychedelic therapy) and want to share your testimonial with us in preparation for our launch, please fill out this form – ClusterFree Release Form.

See my interview with Jessica Khurana, founder of Eleusinia Retreat center in Mexico, the only psychedleic retreat center that specializes in offering its services to people who suffering from severe chronic pain of the sort that can be aided with psychedelic therapy.


In early July I’m traveling to Crete for ASSC, followed by the the ASSC Sattelite Event on ​Non-Ordinary States of Consciousness “QUALIUS“. And from there I plan to visit France for a couple of days (July 15-18) before I head to Sweden (to attend Borderland! I hope to see you there!) and finally will take a brief break in the UK early August on my way back. Please hit me up if you’d like to meet: will update this page with the corresponding QRI Schelling Point for each of my visits.

UPDATE: There will be a France QRI Meetup on the 16th of July, from noon to 6PM in Paris (8 Gal Saint-Marc, 75002). Then a Swedish QRI Meetup on the 18th at 6:30PM at Boulebar Rålambshov in Stockholm. Finally, UK Meetup will also be happening on August 3rd 5PM (until late) at Newspeak House: https://lu.ma/mmjwfq5e?tk=ydkN6X See you there! 🙂


Ps. I found this neat puzzle, see if you can figure it out 🙂

5-MeO-DMT and Personality Metadata

An aspect of 5-MeO-DMT phenomenology that gives the “I became God” impression is the loss of embodied personality metadata in the rendering of one’s experience.

My impression is that we hold a sense of who we are in the shape of muscle tension (especially our face, which provides the main affective and identity channel for social communication) and that 5-MeO-DMT radically reorganizes these patterns. In particular, it creates large patches of expansion and contraction rather than the very surgical and microexpression-aware identity construction we usually carry around implicitly in the background. We can code our experiences as “ours” in part because the presence of this “social identity” plays the role of the “witness” of the experience for holographic encoding.

When the social mask is dissolved through large blunt patches of expansion and contraction, who is the one who experiences this? Of course your face was never the witness, but that has been an integral part of the social software we always live with, so its sudden breakdown causes a powerful impression of conscious anonymity.

In turn, this feels as if: you have always been this impersonal God/Big Mind and the specific person you happen to be is one of many “television channels” this larger being tunes into. Depending on the dose, you may even get the impression that your whole life, and perhaps everything on this planet, is a kind of commercial or small TV segment within a larger Big Mind Space Opera involving countless realms and incarnations. It’s impressionistic, of course. Nothing tells you this explicitly. Rather it’s what the Eternal Scream of the Baby Universe feels like from the inside. Anonymous consciousness waking up to itself, shaking the dream of being a person.