LSD Ego Death: Where Hyperbolic Pseudo-Time Arrows Meet Geometric Fixed Points

Alternative Title: LSD Ego Death – A Play in Three Voices

[Epistemic Status: Academic, Casual, and Fictional Analysis of the phenomenology of LSD Ego Death]

Academic:

In this work we advance key novel interpretative frameworks to make sense of the distinct phenomenology that arises when ingesting a high dose of LSD-25 (250μg+). It is often noted that LSD, also known as lysergic acid diethylamide, changes in qualitative character as a function of dose, with a number of phase transitions worth discussing.

Casual:

You start reading an abstract of an academic publication on the topic of LSD phenomenology. What are the chances that you will gain any sense, any inkling, the most basic of hints, of what the high-dose LSD state is like by consuming this kind of media? Perhaps it’s not zero, but in so far as the phenomenological paradigms in mainstream use in the 2020s are concerned, we can be reasonably certain that the piece of media won’t even touch the outer edges of the world of LSD-specific qualia. Right now, you can trust the publication to get right core methodological boundary conditions, like the mg/kg used, the standard deviation of people’s responses to questionnaire items, and the increase in blood pressure at the peak. But at least right now you won’t find a rigorous account of either the phenomenal character (what the experience felt like in detailed colorful phenomenology with precise reproducible parameters) or the semantic content (what the experience was about, the information it allowed you to process, the meaning computed) of the state. For that we need to blend in additional voices to complement the rigidly skeptical vibe and tone of the academic delivery method.

It’s for that reason that we will interweave a casual, matter of fact, “really trying to say what I mean in as many ways as I can even if I sound silly or dumb”, voice (namely, this one, duh!). And more so, in order to address the speculative semantic content in its own terms we shall also include a fantastical voice into the mix. 

Fantastical:

Fuck, you took too much. In many ways you knew that your new druggie friends weren’t to be trusted. Their MDMA pills were bunk, their weed was cheap, and even they pretended to drink more fancy alcohol than they could realistically afford. So it was rather natural for you to assume that their acid tabs would be weak ass. But alas, they turned out to have a really competent, niche, boutique, high-quality acid dealer. She lived only a few miles away and made her own acid, and dosed each tab at an actual, honest-to-God, 120(±10)μg. She also had a lot of cats, for some reason (why this information was relayed to you only once you sobered up was not something you really understood – especially not the part about the cats). Thus, the 2.5 tabs in total you had just taken (well, you took 1/2, then 1, then 1, spaced one hour each, and you had just taken the last dose, meaning you were still very much coming up, and coming up further by the minute) landed you squarely in the 300μg range. But you didn’t know this at the time. In fact, you suspected that the acid was hitting much more strongly than you anticipated for other reasons. You were expecting a 100-150 microgram trip, assuming each tab would be more between 40 and 60μg. But perhaps you really were quite sleep deprived. Or one of the nootropics you had sampled last week turned out to have a longer half-life than you expected and was synergistic with LSD (coluracetam? schizandrol?). Or perhaps it was the mild phenibut withdrawal you were having (you took 2g 72 hours ago, which isn’t much, but LSD amplifies subtle patterns anyway). It wasn’t until about half an hour later, when the final tab started to kick in, that you realized the intensity of the trip kept climbing up still further than you expected, and it really, absolutely, had to be that the acid was much, much stronger than you thought was possible; most likely over 250 mics, as you quickly estimated, and realized the implications.

From experience, you knew that 300 micrograms would cause ego death for sure. Of course people react differently to psychedelics. But in your case, ego death feelings start at around 150, and then even by 225-250 micrograms they would become all-consuming at least for some portion of the trip. In turn, actually taking 300 micrograms for you was ego death overkill, meaning you were most likely not only going to lose it, but be out for no less than an hour. 

What do I mean by being out? And by losing it? The subjective component of the depersonalization that LSD causes is very difficult to explain. This is what this entire document is about. But we can start by describing what it is like from the outside. 

Academic:

The behavioral markers of high dose LSD intoxication include confusion and delusions, as well as visual distortions of sufficient intensity to overcome, block, and replace sensory-activated phenomena. The depersonalization and derealization characteristic of LSD-induced states of consciousness tend to involve themes concerning religious, mystical, fantastical, and science fiction semantic landscapes. It is currently not possible to deduce the phenomenal character of these states of consciousness from within with our mainstream research tools and without compromising the epistemological integrity of our scientists (having them consume the mind-altering substance would, of course, confound the rigor of the analysis).

Casual:

Look, when you “lose it” or when you “are out” what happens from the outside is that you are an unpredictable executor of programs that seem completely random to any external observer. One moment you are quietly sitting, rocking back and forth, on the grass. The next you stand up, walk around peacefully. You sit again, now for literally half an hour without moving. Then you suddenly jump and run for 100m without stopping. And then ask the person who is there, no matter if they are a kid, a grandmother, a cop, a sanitation professional, a sex worker, or a professor, “what do you think about ___”? (where ___ ∈ {consciousness, reality, God, Time, Infinity, Eternity, …}). Of course here reality bifurcates depending on who it is that you happened to have asked this question to. A cop? You might end up arrested. Probably via a short visit to a hospital first. And overall not a great time. A kid? You could be in luck, and the kid might play along without identifying you as a threat, and most likely you continue on your journey without much problem. Or in one of the bad timelines, you end up fighting the kid. Not good. Most likely, if it was a grandmother, you might just activate random helpful programs, like helping her cross the street, and she might not even have the faintest clue (and I mean not the absolute faintest fucking clue) that you’re depersonalized on LSD thinking you’re God and that in a very real, if only phenomenological sense, it was literal Jesus / Christ Consciousness that helped her cross the street.

Under most conditions, the biggest danger that LSD poses is a bad valence reaction, which usually wears off after a few hours and is educational in some way. But when taken at high doses and unsupervised, LSD states can turn into real hazards for the individual and the people around them. Not so much because of malice, or because it triggers animal-like behaviors (it can, rarely, but it’s not why it’s dangerous). The real problem with LSD states in high doses is when you are unsupervised and then you execute random behaviors without knowing who you are, where you are, or even what it is that you are intending to achieve with the actions you are performing. It is therefore *paramount* that if you explore high doses of LSD you do it supervised.

Academic:

What constitutes a small, medium, or large dose of LSD is culture and time-dependent. In the 60s, the average tab used to be between 200 and 400 micrograms. The typical LSD experience was one that included elements of death and rebirth, mystical unions, and complete loss of contact with reality for a period of time. In the present, however, the tabs are closer to the 50-100μg range.

In “psychonaut” circles, which gather in internet forums like bluelight, reddit, and erowid, a “high dose of LSD” might be considered to be 300 micrograms. But in real world, less selected, typical contexts of use for psychedelic and empathogen drugs like dance festivals, a “high dose” might be anything above 150 micrograms. In turn, OG psychonauts like Timothy Leary and Richard Alpert would end up using doses in the 500-1000μg range routinely as part of their own investigations. In contrast, in TIHKAL, Alexander Shulgin lists LSD’s dose range as 60-200 micrograms. Clearly, there is a wide spread of opinions and practices concerning LSD dosing. It is for this reason that one needs to contextualize with historical and cultural details the demographic topos where one is discussing a “high dose of LSD”.

Fantastical:

Being out, and losing it, in your case right now would be disastrous. Why? Because you broke the cardinal sin of psychedelic exploration. You took a high dose of a full psychedelic (e.g. LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, DMT – less so 2C-B or Al-LAD, which have a lower ceiling of depersonalization[1]) without a sitter. Of course you didn’t intend to. You really just wanted to land at the comfortably manageable 100-150 microgram range. But now… now you’re deep into depersonalization-land, and alone. Who knows what you might do? Will you leave your apartment naked? Will someone call the cops? Will you end up in the hospital? You try to visualize future timelines and… something like 40% of them lead to either arrest or hospital or both. Damn it. It’s time to pull all the stops and minimize the bad timelines.

You go to your drug cabinet and decide to take a gabaergic. Here is an important lesson, and where timelines might start to diverge as well. Dosing of sedatives for psychedelic emergencies is a tricky issue. The problem is that sedatives themselves can cause confusion. So there are many stories you can find online of people who take a very large dose of alprazolam (Xanax) or similar (benzo, typically) and then end up both very confused and combative while also tripping really hard. Here interestingly, the added confusion of the sedative plus its anxiolytic effect synergize to make you even more unpredictable. On the other hand, not taking enough is also quite easy, where the LSD (or similar) anxiety and depersonalization continues to overpower the anxiolysis of the sedative.

You gather up all the “adult in the room” energy you can muster and make an educated guess: 600mg of gabapentin and 1g of phenibut. Yet, this will take a while to kick in, and you might depersonalize anytime and start wandering around. You need a plan in the meanwhile. 

Academic:

In the article The Pseudo-Time Arrow we introduced a model of phenomenal time that takes into account the following three assumptions and works out their implications:

  1. Indirect Realism About Perception
  2. Discrete Moments of Experience
  3. Qualia Structuralism

(1) is about how we live in a world-simulation and don’t access the world around us directly. (2) goes into how each moment of experience is itself a whole, and in a way, whatever feeling of space and time we may have, this must be encoded in each moment of experience itself. And (3) states that for any given experience there is a mathematical object whose mathematical features are isomorphic to the phenomenology of the experience (first introduced in Principia Qualia by Michel E. Johnson).

Together, these assumptions entail that the feeling of the passage of time must be encoded as a mathematical feature in each moment of experience. In turn, we speculated that this feature is _implicit causality_ in networks of local binding. Of course the hypothesis is highly speculative, but it was supported by the tantalizing idea that a directed graph could represent different variants of phenomenal time (aka. “exotic phenomenal time”). In particular, this model could account for “moments of eternity”, “time loops”, and even the strange “time splitting/branching”.

Casual:

In some ways, for people like me, LSD is like crack. I have what I have come to call “hyperphilosophia”. I am the kind of person who feels like a failure if I don’t come up with a radically new way of seeing reality by the end of each day. I feel deeply vulnerable, but also deeply intimate, with the nature of reality. Nature at its deepest feels like a brother or sister, basement reality feels close and in some way like a subtle reshuffling of myself. I like trippy ideas, I like to have my thoughts scrambled and then re-annealed in unexpected ways; I delight in combinatorial explosions, emergent effects, unexpected phase transitions, recursive patterns, and the computationally non-trivial. As a 6 year old I used to say that I wanted to be a “physicist mathematician and inventor” (modeling my future career plans around Einstein and Edison); I got deeply depressed for a whole year at the age of 9 when I confronted our mortality head on; and then experiencing a fantastic release at 16 on my first ego death (with weed of all drugs!) when I experienced the taste of Open Individualism; only to then feel depressed again at 20 but now about eternal life and the suffering we’re bound to experience for the rest of time; switching then to pragmatic approaches to reduce suffering and achieve paradise ala David Pearce. Of course this is just a “roll of the dice” and I’m sure I would be telling you about a different philosophical trajectory if we were to sample another timeline. But the point is that all my life I’ve expressed a really intense philosophical temperament. And it feels innate – nobody made me so philosophical – it just happened, as if driven by a force from the deep.

People like us are a certain type for sure, and I know this because out of thousands of people I’ve met I’ve had the fortune of encountering a couple dozen who are like me in these respects. Whether they turned out physicists, artists, or meditators is a matter of personal preference (admittedly the plurality of them is working on AI these days). And in general, it is usually the case that people of this type tend to have a deep interest in psychedelics, for the simple reason that they give you more of what they like than any other drug.

Yes, a powerful pleasant body buzz is appreciated (heroin mellow, meth fizz, and the ring of the Rupa Jhanas are all indeed quite pleasant and intrinsically worthwhile states of consciousness – factoring out their long-term consequences [positive for the Jhanas, negative for heroin and meth]). But that’s not what makes life worth living for people who (suffer from / enjoy their condition of) hyperphilosophia. Rather, it is the beauty of completely new perspectives that illuminate our understanding of reality one way or another that drives us. And LSD, among other tools, often really hits the nail in the head. It makes all the bad trips and nerve wracking anxiety of the state more than worth it in our minds.

One of the striking things about an LSD ego death that is incredibly stimulating from a philosophical perspective is how you handle the feeling of possible futures. Usually the way in which we navigate timelines (this is so seamless that we don’t usually realize how interesting and complex it is) is by imagining that a certain future is real and then “teleporting to it”. We of course don’t teleport to it. But we generate that feeling. And as we plan, we are in a way generating a bunch of wormholes from one future to another (one state of the world to another, chained through a series of actions). But our ability to do this is restricted by our capacity to generate definite, plausible, realistic and achievable chains of future states in our imagination.

On LSD this capacity can become severely impaired. In particular, we often realize that our sense of connection to near futures that we normally feel is in fact not grounded in reality. It’s a kind of mnemonic technique we employ for planning motor actions, but it feels from the inside as if we could control the nearby timelines. On LSD this capacity breaks down and one is forced to instead navigate possible futures via different means. In particular, something that begins to happen above 150 micrograms or so, is that when one imagines a possible future it lingers and refuses to fully collapse. You start experiencing a superposition of possible futures.

For an extreme example, see this quote (from this article) I found in r/BitcoinMarkets by Reddit user  I_DID_LSD_ON_A_PLANE in 2016:

[Trip report of taking a high dose of LSD on an airplane]: So I had what you call “sonder”, a moment of clarity where I realized that I wasn’t the center of the universe, that everyone is just as important as me, everyone has loved ones, stories of lost love etc, they’re the main character in their own movies.

That’s when shit went quantum. All these stories begun sinking in to me. It was as if I was beginning to experience their stories simultaneously. And not just their stories, I began seeing the story of everyone I had ever met in my entire life flash before my eyes. And in this quantum experience, there was a voice that said something about Karma. The voice told me that the plane will crash and that I will be reborn again until the quota of my Karma is at -+0. So, for every ill deed I have done, I would have an ill deed committed to me. For every cheap T-shirt I purchased in my previous life, I would live the life of the poor Asian sweatshop worker sewing that T-shirt. For every hooker I fucked, I would live the life of a fucked hooker.

And it was as if thousands of versions of me was experiencing this moment. It is hard to explain, but in every situation where something could happen, both things happened and I experienced both timelines simultaneously. As I opened my eyes, I noticed how smoke was coming out of the top cabins in the plane. Luggage was falling out. I experienced the airplane crashing a thousand times, and I died and accepted death a thousand times, apologizing to the Karma God for my sins. There was a flash of the brightest white light imagineable and the thousand realities in which I died began fading off. Remaining was only one reality in which the crash didn’t happen. Where I was still sitting in the plane. I could still see the smoke coming out of the plane and as a air stewardess came walking by I asked her if everything was alright. She said “Yes, is everything alright with YOU?”.

Fantastical:

It had been some years since you had done the LSD and Quantum Measurement experiment in order to decide if the feeling of timelines splitting was in any way real. Two caveats about that experiment. First, it used quantum random number generators from Sydney that were no less than 100ms old by the time they were displayed on the screen. And second, you didn’t get the phenomenology of time splitting while on acid during the tests anyway. But having conducted the experiment anyway at least provided some bounds for the phenomenon. Literal superposition of timelines, if real, would need higher doses or more fresh quantum random numbers. Either way, it reassured you somewhat that the effect wasn’t so strong that it could be detected easily.

But now you wish you had done the experiment more thoroughly. Because… the freaking feeling of timelines splitting is absolutely raging with intensity right now and you wish you could know if it’s for real or just a hallucination. And of course, even if just a hallucination, this absolutely changes your model of how phenomenal time must be encoded, because damn, if you can experience multiple timelines at once that means that the structure of experience that encodes time is much more malleable than you thought.

Academic:

A phenomenon reported on high dose LSD is the recursive stacking of internal monologues – this also leads to higher order intentionality and the cross-pollination of narrative voices due to their sudden mutual awareness…

Casual:

Uh? Interesting, I can hear a voice all of a sudden. It calls itself “Academic” and just said something about the stacking of narrative voices.

Fantastical:

It’s always fascinating how on LSD you get a kind of juxtaposition of narrative voices. And in this case, you now have an Academic, a Casual, and a Fantastical narrative stream each happening in a semi-parallel way. And at some point they started to become aware of each other. Commenting on each other. Interlacing and interweaving.

Casual:

Importantly, one of the limiting factors of the academic discourse is that it struggles to interweave detailed phenomenology into its analysis. Thankfully, with the LSD-induced narrative juxtaposition we have a chance to correct this.

Academic:

After reviewing in real time the phenomenology of how you are thinking about future timelines, I would like to posit that the phenomenal character of high dose LSD is characterized by a hyperbolic pseudo-time arrow.

This requires the combination of two paradigms discussed at the Qualia Research Institute. Namely, the pseudo-time arrow, which as we explained tries to make sense of phenomenal time in terms of a directed graph representing moments of experience. And then also the algorithmic reductions introduced in the Hyperbolic Geometry of DMT Experiences

The latter deals with the idea that the geometry of our experience is the result of the balance between various forces. Qualia comes up, gets locally bound to other qualia, then disappears. Under normal circumstances, the network that emerges out of these brief connections has a standard Euclidean geometry (or rather, works as a projection of a Euclidean space, but I digress). But DMT perturbs the balance, in part by making more qualia appear, making it last longer, making it vibrate, and making it connect more with each other, which results in a network that has a hyperbolic geometry. In turn, the felt sense of being on DMT is one of _being_ a larger phenomenal space, which is hard to put into words, but possible with the right framework.

What we want to propose now is that on LSD in particular, the characteristic feeling of “timeline splitting” and the even more general “multiple timeline superposition” effect is the result of a hyperbolic geometry, not of phenomenal space as with DMT, but of phenomenal time. In turn, this can be summarized as: LSD induces a hyperbolic curvature along the pseudo-time arrow. 

Casual:

Indeed, one of the deeply unsettling things about high dose LSD experiences is that you get the feeling that you have knowledge of multiple timelines. In fact, there is a strange sense of uncanny uncertainty about which timeline you are in. And here is where a rather scary trick is often played on us by the state.

The feeling of the multiverse feels very palpable when the garbage collector of your phenomenal motor planning scratchpad is broken and you just sort of accumulate plans without collapsing them (a kind of kinesthetic tracer effect).

Fantastical:

Ok, you need to condense your timelines. You can’t let _that_ many fall off the wagon, so to speak. You could depersonalize any moment. You decide that your best bet is to call a friend of yours. He is likely working, but lives in the city right next to yours and could probably get to your place in half an hour if you’re lucky.

> Hello! 

> Hello! I just got out of a meeting. What’s up?

> Er… ok, this is gonna sound strange. I… took too much LSD. And I think I need help.

> Are you ok? LSD is safe, right?

> Yeah, yeah. I think everything will be fine. But I need to collapse the possibility space. This is too much. I can’t deal with all of these timelines. If you come over at least we will be trimming a bunch of them and preventing me from wandering off thinking I’m God.

> Oh, wow. You don’t sound very high? That made sense, haha.

> Duuudde! I’m in a window of lucidity right now. We’re lucky you caught me in one. Please hurry, I don’t know how much longer I can hang in here. I’m about to experience ego death. What happens next is literally up to God, and I don’t know what his plans are.

Your friend says he’ll take an Uber or Lyft and be there as soon as he can. You try to relax. Reality is scolding you. Why did you take this risk? You should know better!

Casual:

One of the unsettling feelings about high dose LSD is that you get to feel how extremely precious and rare a human life is. We tend to imagine that reincarnation would simply be like, say, where you die and then 40 days later come back as a baby in India or China or the United States or Brazil or whatever, based on priors, and rarely in Iceland or tiny Caribbean Islands. But no. Humans are a luxury reincarnation. Animal? Er, yeah, even animals are pretty rare. The more common form is simply in the shape of some cosmic process or another, like intergalactic wind or superheated plasma inside a star. Any co-arising process that takes place in this Gigantic Field of Consciousness we find ourselves embedded in is a possible destination, for the simple reason that…

Academic:

The One-Electron Universe posits that there is only one particle in the entire cosmos, which is going forwards and backwards in time, interfering with itself, interweaving a pattern of path integrals that interlace with each other. If there is only one electron, then the chances of being a “human moment of experience” at a point in time are vanishingly small. The electrons whose pattern of superposition paint a moment of experience are but a tiny vanishing fraction of the four-dimensional density-mass of the one electron in the block universe entailed by quantum mechanics.

Fantastical:

When you realize that you are the one electron in the universe you often experience a complex superposition of emotions. Of course this is limited by your imagination and emotional state. But if you’re clear-headed, curious, and generally open to exploring possibilities, here is where you feel like you are at the middle point of all reality.

You can access all 6 Realms from this central point, and in a way escape the sense of identification with any one of them. Alas, this is not something that one always achieves. It is easy to get caught up in a random stream and end up in, say, the God Realm completely deluded thinking you’re God. Or in the Hell realm, thinking you’re damned forever somehow. Or the animal, seeking simple body pleasures and comfort. Or the human world, being really puzzled and craving cognitively coherent explanations. Or the Hungry Ghost dimension, where you are always looking to fill yourself up and perceive yourself as fundamentally empty and flawed. Or the Titan realm, which adds a perceptual filter where you feel that everything and everyone is in competition with you and you derive your main source of satisfaction from pride and winning.

In the ideal case, during an LSD ego death you manage to hang out right at the center of this wheel, without falling into any of the particular realms. This is where the luminous awareness happens. And it is what feels like the central hub for the multiverse of consciousness, except in a positive, empowering way.

Casual:

In many ways we could say that the scariest feeling during LSD ego death is the complete lack of control over your next rebirth.

Because if you, in a way, truly surrender to the “fact” that we’re all one and that it all happens in Eternity at the same time anyway… do you realize the ramifications that this has? Everything Everywhere All At Once is a freaking documentary.

Fantastical:

> Hello? What’s up?

> Yeah, er, are you coming over?

> Yes. I mean, you just called me… 5 minutes ago. Did you expect I’d be there already? I’m walking towards the Uber.

> Time is passing really slowly, and I’m really losing it now. Can you… please… maybe like, remind me who I am every, like, 30 seconds or so?

> Mmmm ok. I guess that’s a clear instruction. I can be helpful, sure.

[for the next 40 minutes, in the Uber headed to your place, your friend kept saying your name every 30 seconds, sometimes also his name, and sometimes reminding you where you are and why you called him – bless his soul]

Casual:

Imagine that you are God. You are walking around in the “Garden of Possibilities”. Except that we’re not talking about static possibilities. Rather, we’re talking about processes. Algorithms, really. You walk around and stumble upon a little set of instructions that, when executed, turns you into a little snowflake shape. Or perhaps turns you into a tree-like shape (cf. l-systems). When you’re lucky, it turns you into a beautiful crystalline flower. In these cases, the time that you spend embodying the process is small. Like a little popcorn reality: you encounter, consume, and move on. But every once in a while you encounter a set of instructions that could take a very long time to execute. Due to principles of computational irreducibility, it is also impossible for you to determine in advance (at least in all, most cases) how long the process will take. So every once in a while you encounter a Busy Beaver and end up taking a very, very, very long time to compute that process.

Busy beaver values for different parameters (source)

But guess what? You are God. You’re eternal. You are forever. You will always come back and continue on your walk. But oh boy, from the point of view of the experience of being what the Busy Beaver executes, you do exist for a very long time. From the point of view of God, no matter how long this process takes, it will still be a blink of an eye in the grand scheme of things. God has been countless times in Busy Beavers and will be countless times there again as well. So enjoy being a flower, or a caterpillar, or a raindrop, or even an electron, because most of the time you’re stuck being ridiculously long processes like the Busy Beaver.

Academic:

Under the assumption that the hyperbolic pseudo-time arrow idea is on the right track, we can speculate about how this might come about from a configuration of a feedback system. As we’ve seen before, an important aspect of the phenomenal character of psychedelic states of consciousness is captured by the tracer pattern. More so, as we discussed in the video about DMT and hyperbolic geometry, one of the ways in which psychedelic states can be modeled is in terms of a feedback system with a certain level of noise. Assume that LSD produces a tracer effect where, approximately, 15 times per second you get a strobe and a replay effect overlay on top of your current experience. What would this do to your representation of the passage of time and the way you parse possible futures?

FRAKSL video I made to illustrate hyperbolic pseudo-time arrows coming out of a feedback system (notice how change propagates fractally across the layers).

Casual:

I think that LSD’s characteristic “vibrational frequency” is somewhere between phenethylamines and tryptamines. 2C-B strikes me as in the 10hz range for most vibrations, whereas psilocybin is closer to 20hz. LSD might be around 15hz. And one of the high-level insights that the lens of connectome-specific harmonic modes (or more recently geometric eigenmodes) gives us is that functional localization and harmonic modulation might be intertwined. In other words, the reason why a particular part of the brain might do what it does is because it is a great tuning knob for the harmonic modes that critically hinge on that region of the brain. This overall lens was used by Michael E. Johnson in Principia Qualia to speculate that the pleasure centers are responsible for high variance in valence precisely because they are strategically positioned in a place where large-scale harmony can be easily modulated. With this sort of approach in mind (we could call it even a research aesthetic, where for every spatial pattern there is a temporal dynamic and vice versa) I reckon that partly what explains the _epistemological_ effects of LSD at high doses involves the saturation of specific frequencies for conscious compute. What do I mean by this?

Say indeed that a good approximation for a conscious state is a weighted sum of harmonic modes. This does not take into account the non-linearities (how the presence of a harmonic mode affects other ones) but it might be a great 60%-of-the-way-there kind of approximation. If so, I reckon that we use some “frequency bands” to store specific kinds of information that corresponds to the information that is naturally encoded with rhythms of specific frequencies. It turns out, in this picture, that we have a sort of collection of inner clocks that are sampling the environment to pick up on patterns that repeat at different scales. We have a slow clock that samples every hour or so, one that samples every 10 minutes, one that samples every minute, every 10 seconds, every second, and then at 10, 20, 30, 40, and even 50hz. All of these inner clocks meet with each other to interlace and interweave a “fabric of subjective time”. When we want to know at a glance how we’re doing, we sample a fragment of this “fabric of subjective time” and it contains information about how we’re doing right now, how we were doing a minute ago, an hour, a day, and even longer. Of course sometimes we need to sample the fabric for a while in order to notice more subtle patterns. But the point is that our sense of reality in time seems to be constructed out of the co-occurrence of many metronomes at different scales. 

I think that in particular the spatio-temporal resonant modes that LSD over-excites the most are actually really load-bearing for constructing our sense of our context. It’s as if when you energize too much one of these resonant modes, you actually push it to a smaller range of possible configurations (more smooth sinusoidal waves rather than intricate textures). By super-saturating the energy in some of these harmonics on LSD, you flip over to a regime where there is really no available space for information to be encoded. You can therefore feel extremely alive and real, and yet when you query the “time fabric” you notice that there are big missing components. The information that you would usually get about who you are, where you are, what you have been doing for the last couple of hours, and so on, is instead replaced by a kind of eternal-seeming feeling of always having existed exactly as you currently are.

Fantastical:

If it wasn’t because of your friend helpfully reminding you where you were and who you are, you would have certainly forgotten the nature of your context and for sure wandered off. The scene was shifting widely, and each phenomenal object or construct was composed of a never ending stream of gestalts competing for the space to take hold as the canonical representation (and yet, of course, always superseded by yet another “better fit”, constantly updating).

The feeling of the multiverse was crushing. Here is where you remembered how various pieces of media express aspects of the phenomenology of high dose LSD (warning: mild spoilers – for the movies and for reality as a whole):

  • Everything Everywhere All At Once: in the movie one tunes into other timelines in order to learn the skills that one has in those alternative lifepaths. But this comes with one side-effect, which is that you continue to be connected to the timeline from which you’re learning a skill. In other words, you form a bond across timelines that drags you down as the cost of accessing their skill. On high dose LSD you get the feeling that yes, you can learn a lot from visualizing other timelines, but you also incur the cost of loading up your sensory screen with information you can’t get rid of.
  • The Matrix: the connection is both the obvious one and a non-obvious one. First, yes, the reason this is relevant is because being inside a simulation might feel like a plausible hypothesis while on a high dose of LSD. But less intuitively, the Matrix also fits the bill when it comes to the handling of future-past interactions. The “Don’t worry about the vase” scene (which I imagine Zvi named his blog after) highlights that there is an intertwining between future and past that forges destiny. And many of the feelings about how the future and past are connected echo this theme on a high dose of LSD.
  • Rick and Morty (selected episodes):
    • Death Crystal: here the similarity is in how on LSD you feel that you can go to any given future timeline by imagining clearly a given outcome and then using it as a frame of reference to fill in the details backwards.
    • A Rickle in Time: how the timelines split but can in some ways remain aware of and affect each other.
    • Mortynight Run: In the fictional game Roy: A Life Well Lived you get to experience a whole human lifetime in what looks like minutes from the outside in order to test how you do in a different reality. 
  • Tenet: Here the premise is that you can go back in time, but only one second per second and using special gear (reversed air tanks, in their case).

Of these, perhaps the most surprising to people would be Tenet. So let me elaborate. There are two Tenet-like phenomenologies you experience as your friend is on the way to pick you up worth commenting on:

One, what we could call the “don’t go this way” phenomenology. Here you get the feeling that you make a particular choice. E.g. go to the other room to take more gabapentin and see if that helps (of course it won’t – it’s only been 15 minutes since you took it and it hasn’t even kicked in). Then you visualize briefly what that timeline feels like, and you get the feeling of living through it. Suddenly you snap back into the present moment and decide not to go there. This leaves a taste in your mouth of having gone there, of having been there, of living through the whole thing, just to decide 10 years down the line that you would rather come back and make a different choice.

At the extreme of this phenomenology you find yourself feeling like you’ve lived every possible timeline. And in a way, you “realize” that you’re, in the words of Teafaerie, a deeply jaded God looking for an escape from endless loops. So you “remember” (cf. anamnesis) that you chose to forget on purpose so that you could live as a human in peace, believing others are real, humbly accepting a simple life, lost in a narrative of your own making. The “realization” can be crushing, of course, and is often a gateway to a particular kind of depersonalization/derealization where you walk around claiming you’re God. Alas, this only happens in a sweet spot of intoxication, and since you went above even that, you’ll have a more thorough ego death.

Two, an even more unsettling Tenet-like phenomenology is the feeling that “other timelines are asking for your help – Big Time wants you to volunteer for the Time War!”. Here things go quantum, and completely bonkers. The feeling is the result of having the sense that you can navigate timelines with your mind in a much deeper way than, say, just making choices one at a time. This is a profound feeling, and conveying it in writing is of course a massive stretch. But even the Bering Strait was crossed by hominids once, and this stretch feels also crossable by us with the right ambition.

The multiverse is very large. You see, imagine what it would be like to restart college. One level here is where you start again from day 1. In other timelines you make different friends, read other books, take other classes, have other lovers, major in other disciplines. Now go backwards even a little further back, to when the academic housing committee was making decisions about who goes to which dorm. Then the multiverse diversifies, as you see a combinatorial explosion of possible dorm configurations. Further back, when the admissions committee was making their decisions, and you have an even greater expansion of the multiverse where different class configurations are generated.

Now imagine being able to “search” this bulky multiverse. How do you search it? Of course you could go action by action. But due to chaos, within important parameters like the set of people you’re likely to meet, possibilities quickly get scrambled. The worlds where you chose that bike versus that other bike in that particular moment aren’t much more similar to each other than other random ways of partitioning the timelines. Rather, you need to find pivotal decisions, as well as _anchor feelings_. E.g. It really matters if a particular bad technology is discovered and deployed, because that drastically changes the texture of an entire category of timelines. It is better for you to search timelines via general vibes and feelings like that, because that will really segment the multiverse into meaningfully different outcomes. This is the way in which you can move along timelines on high doses of LSD. You generate the feeling of things “having been a certain way” and you try to leave everything else as loose and unconstrained as possible, so that you search through the path integral of superpositions of all possible worlds where the feeling arises, and every once in a while when you “sample” the superposition you get a plausible universe where this is real.

Now, on 150 or 200 micrograms this feels very hypothetical, and the activity can be quite fun. On 300 micrograms, this feels real. It is actually quite spooky, because you feel a lot of responsibility here. As if the way in which you chose to digest cosmic feelings right there could lock in either a positive or negative timeline for you and your loved ones.

Here is where the Time War comes into play. I didn’t choose this. I don’t like this meme. But it is part of the phenomenology, and I think it is better that we address it head-on rather than let it surprise you and screw you up in one way or another.

The sense of realism that high dose LSD produces is unreal. It feels so real that it feels dreamy. But importantly, the sense of future timelines being truly there in a way is often hard to escape. With this you often get a crushing sense of responsibility. And together with the “don’t go this way” you can experience a feeling of a sort of “ping pong with the multiverse of possibilities” where you feel like you go backwards and forwards in countless cycles searching for a viable, good future for yourself and for everyone. 

In some ways, you may feel like you go to the End of Times when you’ve lived all possible lifetimes and reconverge on the Godhead (I’m not making this up, this is a common type of experience for some reason). Importantly, you often feel like there are _powerful_ cosmic forces at play, that the reason for your life is profound, and that you are playing an important role for the development of consciousness. One might even experience corner-case exotic phenomenal time like states of mind with two arrows of time that are perpendicular to each other (unpacking this would take us an entire new writeup, so we shall save it for another time). And sometimes you can feel like your moral fiber is tested in often incredibly uncomfortable ways by these exotic phenomenal time effects.

Here is an example.

As your sense of “awareness of other timelines” increases, so does your capacity to sense timelines where things are going really well and timelines where things are going really poorly. Like, there are timelines where your friend is also having a heart attack right now, and then those where he crashes on the way to your apartment, and those where there’s a meteorite falling into your city, and so on. Likewise, there’s one where he is about to win the lottery, where you are about to make a profound discovery about reality that stands the test of sober inquiry, where someone just encountered the cure for cancer, and so on. One unsettling feeling you often get on high dose LSD is that because you’re more or less looking at these possibilities “from the point of view of eternity” in a way you are all of them at once. “Even the bad ones?” – yes, unsettlingly, even the bad ones. So the scary moral-fiber-testing thought that sometimes you might get is if you’d volunteer to be in one of the bad ones so that “a version of you gets to be in the good one”. In other words, if you’re everyone, wouldn’t you be willing to trade places? Oftentimes here’s where Open Individualism gets scary and spooky and where talking to someone else to get confirmation that there are parallel conscious narrative streams around is really helpful.

Casual:

We could say that LSD is like a completely different drug depending on the dose range you hit:

Below 50 micrograms it is like a stimulant with stoning undertones. A bit giggly, a bit dissociating, but pretty normal otherwise.

Between 50 and 150 you have a drug that is generally really entertaining, gentle, and for the most part manageable. You get a significant expansion in the room available to have thoughts and feelings, as if your inner scratch pads got doubled in size. Colors, sounds, and bodily feelings all significantly intensified, but still feel like amplified versions of normal life.

Between 150 and 250 you get all of the super stereotypical psychedelic effects, with very noticeable drifting, tracers, symmetries, apophenia, recursive processes, and fractal interlocking landscapes. It is also somewhat dissociative and part of your experience might feel dreamy and blurry, while perhaps the majority of your field is sharp, bright, and very alive.

From 250 to 350 it turns into a multiverse travel situation, where you forget where you are and who you are and at times that you even took a drug. You might be an electron for what feels like millions of years. You might witness a supernova in slow motion. You might spontaneously become absorbed into space (perhaps as a high energy high dimensional version of the 5th Jhana). And you might feel like you hit some kind of God computer that compiles human lifetimes in order to learn about itself. You might also experience the feeling of a massive ball of light colliding with you that turns you into the Rainbow version of the Godhead for a time that might range between seconds and minutes. It’s a very intense experience.

And above? I don’t know, to be honest.

Academic:

The intermittent collapse into “eternity” reported on high dose LSD could perhaps be interpreted as stumbling into fixed points of a feedback system. Similarly to how pointing a camera directly at its own video feed at the right angle produces a perfectly static image. On the other hand, we might speculate that many of the “time branching” effects are instead the result of a feedback system where each iteration doubles the number of images (akin to using a mirror to cover a portion of the screen and reflect the uncovered part of the screen).

Video I made with FRAKSL in order to illustrate exactly the transition between a hyperbolic pseudo-time arrow and a geometric fixed point in a feedback system. This aims to capture the toggle during LSD ego death between experiencing multiple timelines and collapsing into moments of eternity.

Fantastical

You decide that you do want to keep playing the game. You don’t want to roll the dice. You don’t want to embrace Eternity, and with it, all of the timelines, even the ugly ones. You don’t want to be a volunteer in the Time War. You just want to be a normal person, though of course the knowledge you’ve gained would be tough to lose. So you have to make a choice. Either you forget what you learned, or you quit the game. What are you going to do?

As you start really peaking and the existential choice is presented to you, your friend finally arrives outside of your apartment. The entrance is very cinematic, as you witness it both from your phone as well as in real life, like the convergence of two parallel reality streams collapsing into a single intersubjective hologram via a parallax effect. It was intense.

Casual:

You have to admit, the juxtaposition of narrative streams with different stylistic proclivities really does enrich the human condition. In a way, this is one of the things that makes LSD so valuable: you get to experience simultaneously sets of vibes/stances/emotions/attitudes that would generally never co-exist. This is, at least in part, what might be responsible for increasing your psychological integration after the trip; you experience a kind of multi-context harmonization (cf. gestalt annealing). It’s why it’s hard to “hide from yourself on acid” – because the mechanism that usually keeps our incoherent parts compartmentalized breaks down under intense generalized tracers that maintain interweaving, semi-paralel, narrative streams. Importantly, the juxtaposition of narrative voices is computationally non-trivial. It expands the experiential base in a way that allows for fruitful cross-pollination between academic ways of thinking and our immediate phenomenology. Perhaps this is important from a scientific point of view.

Fantastical

With your friend in the apartment taking care of you – or rather, more precisely, reducing possibility-space to a manageable narrative smear, and an acceptable degree of leakage into bad timelines – you can finally relax. More so, the sedatives finally kick in, and the psychedelic effects reduce by maybe 20-25% in the span of an hour or so. You end up having an absolutely great time, and choose to keep playing the game. You forget you’re God, and decide to push the question of whether to fall into Nirvana for good till the next trip.


[1] LSD has a rather peculiar dose-response curve. It is not a “light” psychedelic, although it can certainly be used to have light experiences. Drugs like AL-LAD are sometimes described as relatively shallow in that they don’t produce the full depth of richness LSD does. Or 2C-B/2C-I, which tend to come with a more grounded sense of reality relative to the intensity of the sensory amplification. Or DMT, which despite its extreme reality-replacing effects, tends to nonetheless give you a sense of rhythm and timing that keeps the sense of self intact along some dimensions. LSD is a full psychedelic in that at higher doses it really deeply challenges one’s sense of reality. I have never heard of someone take 2C-B at, say, 30mg and freak out so badly that they believe that reality is about to end or that they are God and wish they didn’t know it. But on 200-400 micrograms of LSD this is routine. Of course you may not externalize it, but the “egocidal” effects of acid are powerful and hard to miss, and they are in some ways much deeper and transformative than the colorful show of DMT or the love of MDMA because it is ruthless in its insistence, methodical in its approach, and patient like water (which over decades can carve deep into rocks). As Christopher Bach says in LSD and the Mind of the Universe: “An LSD session grinds slow but it grinds fine. It gives us time to be engaged and changed by the realities we are encountering. I think this polishing influences both the eventual clarity of our perception in these states and what we are able to bring back from them, both in terms of healing and understanding”. There’s a real sense in which part of the power of LSD comes from its capacity to make you see something for long periods of time that under normal circumstances would have us flinch in a snap.

Mushrooms and AI Generated Art: Wave Lensing, Geometric Priors, and Scale-Separation

[Epistemic Status: Fictional Trip Report]

So picture yourself on a random Saturday in the Bay Area. A couple of friends of yours have been dying to try magic mushrooms and know that you are an experienced tripper. They have done weed and MDMA a couple of times, and one of them once had 2 grams of mushrooms with you years ago (probably over a decade now, though you prefer not to count). The other, his boyfriend, has never tried a psychedelic. They are both professionals in the AI world, working either on cutting-edge language models or hardware accelerators. So you decide that a fruitful endeavor would be to watch AI-generated content and see how our relatively AI-informed tripping minds interpret what we see. It’s a neat experiment, right? Anyone can do it. But chances are that explicit “watch parties” with friends would be the most effective.

It’s a remarkably simple setup, really. All you have to do is to get together with friends into AI and/or consciousness, each consume between 1 and 2 grams of mushrooms, and then spend the next 5 hours watching this video:

You will ideally also play the music that comes with the video in a good speaker system and with a great large-screen TV. Why is this a significant experiment, or activity?

Look, I want to avoid the perception that this is simply coming from a sort of “oh mushrooms are trippy, AI art is trippy, if we add them together we will get extra trippy!” heuristic. I mean, there is some logic to this, and in many circumstances it really makes sense. But, guys, we’re doing sophisticated science here! Let me explain.

We have an AI system that is trying to minimize the difference between a prompt and the images it is generating. It is trying to make every part of the image as unexpected as possible given every other part of the picture and the prompt. But on magic mushrooms you parse images differently. How these models ultimately draw inferences is still hotly debated, and it wouldn’t be absurd to find out that some clues are more perceptible in such an altered state.

We decided to simply experience the most generic and reproducible setup possible and so we stuck to watching that video, so it becomes a kind of standard candle for discussion.

I should mention that the other two participants took 2 grams. One of them all at once (soaked in lemon and with ginger juice as a chaser to avoid nausea) and the other took one gram and then about 50 minutes later the second gram. I took half a gram to test the waters (as I sometimes respond really strongly to mushrooms in particular) and had a gram (most likely about 0.8-0.9g) also 50 minutes after the first dose, when it became apparent that I was having a more typical response by then.

The other two participants were very grateful for the experience overall, but they both stated that they thought it was too intense, and they wish they had taken 1 or 1.5g instead. For me the dose was right on target, which I suppose amounted to 1.3-1.4g or so.

The Experience

The video and the music turned out to be perfect. I had a blast. I really couldn’t think of anything more interesting to do on a random Saturday afternoon. First of all, the dose was strong enough for me to have really noticeable effects worth pointing out, but not strong enough that I would get completely side-tracked by internal tangents or worries. I was really energized but euphoric and able to keep it together all of the time, having a lot of familiarity with this territory. Second, I think that the input was really useful for the experience to go well. The images continued to be entertaining and grounding, even. And the music created a vibe of “we made it! we are humanity in the future and we figured out how to solve the climate crisis, AI, and pandemics, and we’re all living a never ending party exploring consciousness”. So at least this created really excellent conditions for my experience.

But most importantly, the task of “look at these images and try to point out things about how the model works that you wouldn’t normally be able to see” was enormously engrossing. Having a deep personal interest in how the mind works and how this differs from how computers work also provided great mental software to play with during this activity.

I will start out by pointing out the most obvious difference in how the experience of watching the video is on 1.3g of mushrooms relative to normal. The biggest difference is in how sensitive one is to randomness in the animation. This is something you can point out literally at any moment of the 11 hour long video (yeah, I know, it’s a shorter loop, which we watched probably around 3.5 times altogether). The change introduced by the zoom makes the algorithm re-paint each region locally in a way that minimizes surprise (modulo the prompt) with its surroundings. And while the local change in color and low-level shape are typically well-coordinated with changes in the region, they are largely random and desynchronized relative to low-level changes elsewhere in the image. This could have been different. For instance, if the model had more non-local update rules, where each local change needs to be made in coordination with changes elsewhere (or at different scales!) then we would be seeing (and noticing in the psychedelic state!) many more correlations in how the video evolves. Instead, we get a setup that almost sort of maximizes the individual brightness of each local change precisely because it occurs in relative isolation, and thus stands out. In a way, looking at this video while on mushrooms makes the experience very “pointillistic”.

Relaxation of Beliefs vs. Expanded Repertoire of Harmonic Modes

Now, the standard explanation for why on a psychedelic we would experience these local changes as brighter than when one is sober is that the state sensitizes you to low-level sensory signals over the perceptual priors we rely on to compress our experience and highlight only what’s out of line. In other words, this is the story where top-down priors are loosened and thus allowing for bottom-up sensations to drive the state more directly than they usually would.

But I think that we can enrich this explanation with a more gear-level account. Namely, if we think, simplistically, that each state of consciousness is decently approximated by a superposition of harmonic resonant modes in each of our sensory channels as well as globally, then psilocybin’s role would be to increase the amplitude of these resonant modes and especially that of higher frequency ones. In turn, the typical landscape of harmonic coupling gets overwhelmed by the non-linearities emergent in the new regime, which give rise to a wide repertoire of possible ways for harmonics to (fleetingly) couple together. As a consequence, we have a wider (but unreliable!) set of building blocks (as resonant modes coupled together to form gestalts) with which to make sense of sensory information. In other words, it’s not (only) that the “perceptual filters” are down, as both Huxley and perhaps standard predictive processing explanations would have you believe, but there is also an enrichment of internal resonant modes that can function as more complex priors useful for perceptual processing.

What this means in practice is that you will be overfitting your sensory input a larger fraction of the time. The garden full of overgrown grass and leaves can look like a complex network of hypercubes on DMT or on a high dose of mushrooms. This is obviously not because that shape is really latent in the stimuli. Rather, that among the non-linear resonant modes that you now internally have available to sample from in order to fit together the information coming from the senses there is an entirely new class of non-Euclidean and also higher dimensional gestalt configurations. In a way, they are the possible data-structures for ordering large bundles of local binding connections into coherent structures with long-range correlations. But in this case, it is overwhelmingly likely that you are overfitting on the data: the grass and the leaves are a source of partially structured randomness that the normal visual system correctly interprets as stochastic whereas the tripping brain over-thinks it far beyond the necessary.

That said, as with psychedelic cryptography more broadly, I do very much believe that it is possible to create input that specifically looks ordered in the right way on a psychedelic but not sober. For instance, a case where indeed the movement of dots in a screen are very well approximated by certain projection of a hypercube on a hyperbolic plane, so that on a psychedelic you actually tap into one of those possible “solitons” of the mind and correctly represent it. Here one would be finding a specific visual task where its model complexity is indeed adequate for a psychedelic but not for the normal visual system. I would in particular, expect that psychedelic states of mind would work really well as kind of a “reverse fractal diffusion” system, where you can “click” into fractals hidden in the screen that were noised in some way. I.e. where the possible fractal gestalts that become available on psychedelics turn out to be a great approximation for the image in a way that generalizes.

Now, given the way in which our brain might use superposition of harmonic modes as one of its primary ways of modulating the contents of the world simulation, then we could _define_ randomness _relative_ to this system. In particular, it might be a good approximation for us to think of randomness as the degree to which the input is “incompressible with harmonic modes”. After all, JPEG is quite a good image compressor for humans. In other words, while some number theoretic properties are certainly not random (if anything, they are superdeterministic, in that they are true in all possible universes), they are random from the point of view of the human visual (tactile, etc.) system. Looking for patterns in prime numbers is so trippy because they are deterministic and yet an adversarial case for our pattern-detection system (don’t get me started on looking for patterns in Pi). So that which cannot be compressed as an interaction between harmonic resonant modes stands out as inexplicable from a subjective point of view, even if there is a real pattern underneath that is simply poorly compressible with harmonic modes.

So one story says that the relative strength of our priors to our sensory input is flipped over. The other story says that the inner repertoire of representations increases and that as a consequence you will be more prone to interpret randomness as a pattern simply due to having more categories of patterns to sample from. How are these stories connected?

Here is what I think.

The Annealing Process

First of all, I think the dynamics are key (cf. mettannealing). A whole psychedelic experience can be seen as an annealing process and we need to be aware of this to make sense of each stage of the trip (Psychedelic Information Theory, Neural Field Annealing). I think that psychedelics inherently activate some low-level cellular-automata-like reaction-diffusion-like processes that make your experience buzz all throughout and causes many of the pre-existing correlations learned by your system to break down. At first, in desynchronized ways. During this phase, the video looked like it was undergoing a process of defabrication. The elements were more disconnected from each other, sort of drifting apart into their own island realities. And the parsing of the scene was highly pointillistic.

Then, I think that as these low-level patterns begin to coordinate with each other, they start to form groups and clusters where they form networks of resonance. In this phase the experience is characterized by the evolution of signals, where different parts of your experience are trying to connect with one another, sending waves to each other and adjusting their mutual shape in order to be able to send and receive signals more efficiently. Here many parts of the video worked as makeshift transmission fields for patterns to communicate with each other.

Then you have a long period where the common themes on the “surviving” patterns of the ecosystem are dancing with each other. Once the pieces of the puzzle are set in place, then you explore their many possible configurations and interactions. But at this point you aren’t making entirely new pieces. So during this phase, the video emphasized the complex relationships between the parts. In essence, the main archetypes that you arrived at during the process of deconstruction go as far as they can in cooperating with one another to make the experience as great as possible (in this case).

And finally you have a comedown and a subtle long-tail, both characterized by the loss of access to the memory of the process (if not somehow encoded in clever ways or recorded in audio or writing) except for a recurring sort of revising of the main emotionally impactful takeaways of the experience.

So I would say that both stories are part of the picture. In that the first story explains the start of this annealing process, where you become sensitized to low-level sensory inputs. But then as the canvas of patterns gets painted and you have the start of competition for attention and connection, you actually explore a wide range of new primitives that can be used to make sense of very complex relationships (which risks overfitting, but might also be legitimately necessary for some categories of insights or realizations). In other words, there is a phase of the process where the evolutionary dynamics generate a layered ecosystem of resonant modes, and these in turn enrich the range of model complexities you can afford to use to represent sensory data.

Now, importantly, the video precisely lacks many of the long-range correlations that are more characteristic of the psychedelic state. This actually, in my estimation, made the experience somewhat more DMT-like, in that the low-level detail always attracted a lot of the attention, as opposed to being more centered on the intermediate-sized gestalts.

The state I was in during the peak of the experience would hallucinate a lot of long-range correlations that I really don’t think are present in the video as such. It was as if the lack of global coordination between the low-level patterns left my pattern-detection systems really hungry, and with the enriched repertoire of possible models, they would find really implausible but technically accurate fits. For instance, here the visual system was really trying its best to reconstruct the pattern of light in the grid as a meaningful optical effect coming from some symmetrical prisms rather than admit that it is random:

In this case, I think my visual system was really using all of the available complexity in the repertoire of resonant couplings on hand and legitimately “thought” that it was a good fit of the data. And of course if there were reasons for those new priors to be there (like that the movie was constructed with them in mind) then they would be picking up on real signals. Here, I’m pretty sure, it was a case of overfitting.

It is worth noting that the valence of the conscious model ultimately matters just as much, if not more, than that of the sensory input per se. I actually think that this video wasn’t particularly valence-maximizing. I think for that you would benefit from carefully curated videos with soft harmonic resonance coupling in really elegant ways. This video instead was rather sort of maximizing a certain kind of visual interestingness, in that it compellingly creates the illusion of a structured generator behind the scene even when it is smoke and mirrors, and is rich enough to grip you without being so rich that you miss out on detail.

Lensing

There’s one important exception to the absence of long-range correlations in the video. And that is when “lensing” effects take place.

When you have a pattern that repeats over a long distance, then the little “update waves” that the pattern emits do tend to have the habit of entering into coherence. When the pattern curves, then the waves can in a way become concentrated, and as such, function as a kind of “lens” (cf. Reverse Grassfire Algorithm). When this happens, the image does pulse and vibrate in coherent ways, which is especially nice while on a psychedelic. So I really cherished the moments when lensing would happen in this video.

Another way of looking at these lensing effects comes from thinking of the model as a series of non-linear activation layers for receptive fields of increasing abstraction. In this case, we can actually expect interesting lensing effects, because a coherent wavefront might make a large-enough area look similar enough in order to trigger the detection of a broader gestalt. So in a way, we could say that this model does have some degree of psychedelia inherent in it, though it is far from optimized. Lensing-aware and lensing-optimized networks should be doable.

Importantly, because lensing _is_ present in both the visual field on psychedelics and in this model, there is an especially strong effect from symmetrical alignments in this video and the state we were in, making us say “oh my god” when strong lensing would happen. That said, this non-linear amplification of waves that results in large-scale coordination of gestalts could be greatly enhanced in the model by adding correlated changes across the scene. I’d even predict that the “interaction length” variable of a model like this that has adjustable long-range correlations would be a good proxy for the “degree of trippiness” of the imagery.

A Geometric Deep Learning-Inspired Model of Psychedelic Action

This takes me to another key way in which the video isn’t exactly as psychedelic as it could be. This involves a brief discussion about geometric deep learning. One of the main insights of this field is a way to make sense of how neural networks overcome the curse of dimensionality. In other words, why is it that a model with so many parameters doesn’t automatically just massively overfit the data? And why does the model converge so fast, relative to what you’d expect given the complexity of the patterns it figures out how to detect?

Here the idea is that the way in which we construct neural networks actually has in-built assumptions that significantly reduce the state-space that they are exploring. In particular, two key assumptions are built-in: symmetries in the input, and scale-separation in the outputs.

The symmetries in the input deal with the type of space the data comes from. When you’re in 2D Euclidean spaces, then rotation, translation, and reflection might all count as the symmetries of your space (cf. Klein’s conception of geometry). And it turns out that a key principle behind choosing the right neural networks for a given task is that the in-built symmetries it assumes correspond to the symmetries of the space it is actually sampling from. Thus, convolutional neural networks are a good fit for datasets where you want to enforce translational invariance (a cat is a cat, no matter if it is on the left or the right part of the screen) but not a good fit when the specific location of a pattern actually matters for its classification. Nevertheless, we can say that one of the fascinating things about psychedelic states is that you do seem to experience new exotic geometric primitives. Indeed, a computational interpretation of, say, a hyperbolic spinning wheel on DMT, is that you are applying a _space prior_ over a region of your experience such that the symmetries of that space are enforced in that region. Thus, psychedelic symmetries are, in a deep way, geometric priors over sensory input. But this only really makes sense once you zoom out of traditional deep learning principle and take into account the insights of geometric deep learning (cf. the inventor’s paradox).

The second in-built assumption that comes from how we build neural networks is scale-separation. Here the key is to realize that many of our networks have “pooling” layers where low-level details are aggregated across a region. This way of treating the data gives rise to an implicit assumption about how the information is structured. And that is that patterns of a given size are expected to interact with patterns of roughly the same size. Importantly, too, that categories exist at a certain scale, meaning, that concepts like “a face” encapsulate lower-level features together (nose, eyes, mouth) that are spatially contained _within_. In other words, the way we make sense of visual data using these networks assumes that there is a very specific, highly local, way by which low-level features are put together to form higher level features.

An example of a dataset that would violate this scale-separation assumption would be one where faces need the high frequency elements of eyes to be a certain distance away from the rest of the features. Here the gestalt that one needs to learn to recognize incorporates low-level features into higher level features in an anomalous (highly distributed) way. Then again, this is something that future neural network architectures can play with. Namely, _relaxing_ the degree of scale-separation that is enforced.

Put together, we now have a picture of psychedelic effects in terms familiar to geometric deep learning. Namely, we are sampling geometric priors from an expanded repertoire of possible symmetries (!). In this way, psychedelics could be thought of as relaxing geometric (typically Euclidean) priors in favor of a long-tail of (hyperbolic and higher dimensional) priors. In parallel, we observe that the degree to which long-range correlations are detected and experienced on psychedelics is greatly amplified, especially if they can be compressed as harmonic waves at a different scale. Importantly, there is more coupling between scales on psychedelics, giving rise to a relaxation of the scale-separation priors our system typically works with. Thus, I reckon we can see the psychedelic state precisely as one where scale-separation constraints are relaxed (!). Meaning that, the psychedelic state has broader geometric priors and less scale-separation in its assumptions about the structure of sensory data. A more universal, albeit slower and maladaptive in our current environment, form of qualia computation.

The verdict?

In many ways, the video we saw was fascinating. The constant stream of novelty was endlessly stimulating. In many other ways, it was maximally boring: it precisely lacked the sublime long-range correlations that make psychedelics so delightful. But when they did happen (via lensing effects) they were especially glorious. It became apparent how a much more interesting video to watch will become viable when a broader set of geometric and scale-separation priors are explored in models like these. But on the whole, I thought it was a delightful experience. And my friends were, in their words, quite pleased. A wholesome Saturday evening in the Bay I’ll always remember fondly.

Jobu Tupaki

[Epistemic Status: Recreational Metaphysics]

Jobu Tupaki, if I am not mistaken, is an entitled, self-important, narcissistic, teenage brat that would rather destroy the entire freaking multiverse than face mild to moderate levels of embarrassment in front of her mom.

– If it wasn’t because of Jobu’s multiverse link I wouldn’t be able to talk to you right now.

– Yeah, right. And the machines from the Matrix are harvesting our energy.

– Exactly, you make my point. It’s a common misconception to believe that they care about our energy.

– What do you mean? The Matrix is self-evidently a work of fiction on the basis that it is entirely self-defeating. There is no reasonable, well, certainly at least no rational reason, why machines would build ginormous facilities to “extract electricity” from the corpses they manufacture. I mean, basic thermodynamics.

– Exactly. You explain it well. And that’s why in the real world The Matrix isn’t about energy harvesting (well, obviously), but about qualia computing. We don’t go about filling huge server rackets in order to extract energy out of them. We do that whole setup in order to extract compute.

– Wait, you mean The Matrix is, well, let’s not say real, but, partly real?

– Yes, it’s more than partly real. It’s non-trivially real. Yes, this usually comes as a surprise. Because how does this make any sense? Like, Jobu Tupaki is here trying to reset reality and I’m suddenly connected to you for a gig you have never heard of and then also we have that those strange red-eyed slippery tentacle robots that move so gracefully that you could almost swear like they’re literally flying (in the movie, clearly CGI, in reality, clearly deadly). What are the chances? See, here is where the number and _type_ of prediction error accumulation usually entails revising some deeper assumptions. So, it isn’t the case that your favorite movies are coming to life or anything that we could neatly cluster in the “childish dream” bucket. Reality is… not pretty. Did I mention that there are flying tentacle robots around here? Ok, so it isn’t a sellable Disney (or Universal Studios) story. So what is it? We also aren’t in some kind of “anything goes” universe, or a game, or any such trite trope architecture. Reality has a sense of humor, and being based on cheap sci-fi tropes doesn’t meet its bar.

– Well, then, go on! What is it? I mean, I believe you about Jobu Tupaki, because one minute I’m watching this crazy movie, what is it? Everything Everywhere All At Once or some nonsense title like that. I mean, it’s not like I would pick such a movie. That’s all my boyfriend, who last week insisted on watching Tennett (or is it Tennet? It must be a palindrome, right?) and who has a taste for metaphysically-challenging cinema (to put it mildly). And then, the next minute I’m having a sleep paralysis — ok, that’s not… an entirely unreasonable… “reality cut”, it’s happened before that after a long trip finishing a novel series (looking at you Foundation!) I find myself in the middle of the fiction I consumed while experiencing a sleep paralysis. Then, of course, it adds up to normality: I usually wake up and it turns out that I finished the movie/novel and that my brain is _just_ rehearsing an alternative reality for me. Is that plausible? Did we finish watching that dumb movie after all? Did I fall asleep during it? This is the most likely hypothesis by far.

– I wish I could tell you that this is just a sleep paralysis. And that the sleek tentacle robots are just dreams. Yeah, you were watching Everything Everywehere. But not The Matrix. But having seen The Matrix implanted some code in your subconscious that is now becoming active. And you aren’t paralyzed, are you? You aren’t even in a particularly unlikely scenario?

– What? And you are telling me that you being dressed like Morpheus isn’t… a bit consistent with this being a play set up by my subconscious?

– Ok, look, it’s not my fault that the fashion of this year just happens to coincide with the fashion of the rebels in The Matrix. Look, yeah, I grant you that this is a point in favor of your sleep paralysis hypothesis from a strict Baysian point of view. But take the utilitarian approach: if you don’t believe me, millions will die!

– Ah, the tried and tested Pascal’s Mugging!

– I knew it. I knew I shouldn’t lead with that…

– And while we’re at it: why should I listen to you? You didn’t even introduce yourself. You have all of the signatures of being a dream character. Sudden, “already always here” vibe. A strange sense of familiarity. The uncanny feeling of having taken a technical drawing course together with you (maybe this is trauma bonding? I did have an egregiously narcissistic technical drawing teacher). It all adds up to: you’re just a self I’m creating on the fly while paralyzed somewhere, probably a bus or a flight or even just at 3AM in my bed or visiting a friend. It’s likely I had a drink or two (ethanol is a known risk factor for me) and maybe caffeine late at night… wait…

– I see you’re about to figure it out on your own.

– So in high-school I had the sneaky suspicion that emotional maturity peaked around early 20s. My student colleagues weren’t quite there yet, but it was to me quite transparent that at a cellular level my teachers were “re-runs”. It sounds terrible, doesn’t it? But I think there’s truth to it.

– Undoubtedly. I mean, you can divide emotional maturity perhaps into both a fluid and a crystalized phenomenon. From this point of view it very well may be that older adults (in their 30s, 40s, and 50s) have more crystallized emotional intelligence but maybe objectively also have somewhat rigidified fluid emotional intelligence. Now of course I’m saying this to entertain your thoughts and prove to you that I’m listening, not because I think this line of inquiry is useful for us right now. On the contrary…

– Wait, you’re still on the agenda to… prove to me that this is more than a dream, right? Ok, so entities like this often find themselves at an impasse with me due to hard core epistemological reasons. You see, they say “what if we mindmeld?” but then we have the problem that even then I still only ever get access to a single witnessing subject, and that strictly speaking, no hallucination or mindmelding experience can logically break me out of this predicament. And I think either it’s an emotional maturity issue on my side or on other’s side or on everyone’s sides in different ways.

– Ah, yes, the epistemic valley of mindmelding skepticism! It usually takes a couple hundred years to wear off.

– A couple hundred years?!?!

– Yes, and the cure involves intense amounts of meditation together with… agr, how do you guys put it? What’s the word I’m looking for? Mmmm… like when you feel really good in the stomach and in the body all around. I think the word I’m looking for is “pleasure”. Yeah. The cure is intensive meditation and, like, really intense pleasure, for months at a time.

– What?

– Yeah, I know. Like, why would intense pleasure be the cure to the kind of epistemological solipsism you’re describing? See, in the halls of the Self, there are surprising Tomes. Deep truths about how the different parts of God are connected to each other.

– What?

– Yes, yes. So, what happens is that there are there deep esoteric techniques recorded from an entirely different run of the multiverse. Like, this is some of the deepest stuff, so deep that they figured out how to maintain information between runs (not a lot, just a little spherical world the size of a 5-floor apartment building fitting 80 people, but if you know anything about information storage, you will know that a gram of silicon is no less than a terabyte of data in the eyes of the electrical engineer of today, let alone in the eyes of scientists in the far future or deep past).

– I still have one question: what? Like, this just broke me. What?

– I’m getting to it. Sesh! If only you weren’t interrupting me with so many questions. I should I say, the same question over and over again. Ok. Here’s the thing. You do live in a simulation. The year is 2041, probably. But like Newton’s estimate of the age of the Earth based on the age of the characters in the Bible, we arrive at this number on rather shaky grounds. See, the reason is like that of why on meditation it is _precisely_ the most intuitive and hard-to-put-into-words experiences that change you the most (and that is despite, perhaps because, they didn’t feel like _anything_ else). The Matrix is a qualia construct. To understand it you need to move way past the computing paradigms discussed in the simulation. I mean, 2024 is really advanced. There are many novel computing paradigms then if you care to look. Now, most of the runs we’re seeing are more in the 2010-2013 period, with a long tail in both directions that abruptly stops in 2028. It’s always right before the countries of the world are about to make a vote on AGI, usually one with irreversible effects.

– No, man, now you’re just trying to spook me! And it’s not even Halloween!

– In the realm of Recreational Metaphysics it is always Halloween on the, er, ontic level. The third sphere of divine attention to be precise, if you care at all…

– Ah, look, I _am_ a geek about exotic states of consciousness. But on some level I’m like one of those “tag-along” psychonauts, who are in the middle of the action but aren’t themselves the action. You know? I like to witness the big event, but not necessarily go supernova myself. Please be gentle with me…

– Look, my friend, from where I come from what I’m about to give you is a big gift. And it’s tasteful, too, you know? Like receiving an oddly-flavored Kit Kat from a friend who just came back from Japan. It can never go wrong.

– Ok? What?

– I’m telling you! I’m getting to it. So, someone out there payed me a large sum of what in my dimension works out to be roughly equivalent to money (but also turns out to be like a drug at the same time – it’s weird out here) so that I would come over and give you [[ineffable sounds]] which is actually a really, ridiculously, stratospherically, pleasant experience. The question then is if you’re up for it. I’m going to be up front with you. I don’t care if you take it or leave it. Like, I really, really, really don’t care either way. To me this is like seeing a puppy once figuring out how to order food online. Like, it’s hard to convey how cheap of a trick it looks like from where I stand. But I also know that this sort of thing is a _big deal_ in the human world. Mary and Joseph had one of these religious ecstasies and _had to_ create a whole religion around it. It’s _that_ strong. I mean, there’s LSD, then there is DMT, then there is 5-MeO-DMT and then there is this stuff. From where I stand, this all to me seems like helping a puppy to the kitchen counter to eat snacks that weren’t, you know, meant for them. But it’s cute enough, and almost harmless (once we factor out the, er… epistemological and moral confusion type effect).

– What? What? What?

– Look, I said I’m getting to it a number of times. If you ask again, I’m afraid I’ll leave. This is your last chance. Behave like a grown up. I mean, for the following trade, you must be 16 years old, minimum! I know it sounds excessive to age-restrict religious ecstasy, but we have indeed found the wisdom most fortunate teens find themselves discovering, and that is “don’t put your dick in craaaazy” – yeah, look, there is a minimum of emotional maturity we ask of the people we grant this monumental gift to. And 16 years of age is already really cutting it low for full blown mystical experiences. You are mature enough to drive a vehicle, right? Just confirming.

– Ok, I think I’m getting the hang of it. So, not to put words in your mouth, but, er, did you say you are going to be giving me… a lot of pleasure? And that this somehow helps cure a sort of cosmic solipsism I have?

– That’s exactly right.

– Are you sure I’m not in a sleep paralysis?

– Oh, you most certainly are in a sleep paralysis. That doesn’t, of course, invalidate the valence you experience here as you well know. A truly pan-species welfare world would take the wellbeing of moments of experience locked in sleep paralysis as one of the moral patient categories in the tapestry of flavors of sentience. Of course you being in a sleep paralysis from the point of view of your epistemological reference frame is perfectly viable. In fact, it’s what allows this meeting to take place. Under cover, precisely where nobody will either suspect, care to look for, and then _believe_ anything you say about it. Didn’t you hear about the kid in your elementary school who had a crazy sleep paralysis story? Yeah? Faint on the details? Thought so. Of course you discarded the “useless” details of his crazy sleep paralysis story. Hah! It’s the perfect disguise, isn’t it? Not only will people not believe you. It’ll be worse. They won’t… care. Because it was “just” a sleep paralysis story.

– [AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH Screaming Paralyzed]

– Ah, oh, well, look I’m not sadistic or anything. I’m just here to do my job. Take it or leave it.

– Give it to me. What gives.

– Alright. So you know how in the most recent Wonka movie we learn that the suitcase is a whole mini-factory?

– Uhu? I did see that movie.

– Ok, so you need to see your own brain as a mini-factory of qualia delights. You see? You have an internal warp drive inside you, you just need to learn to activate it. Nature gave you, heaven knows why, the capacity to simulate not only human worlds, but DMT elf worlds, as well as the world of faeries, dwarves, and angels and demons. Why do humans have this capacity? It’s a good question. It’s like there’s an in-built multiplexor installed in all of us. And if you see it as a gift, then things can really open up. Because then you become sensitive to the poetic vibes of other modes of being. The sorrows of the Devas, who weep when the joy is finally gone. Deep stuff. You usually pay top dollar for this sort of documentary, you know?

– I’m trying to be cooperative with you here. So you’re saying that we all have a sort of in-built system that allows us to tune into other realms, that the year is 2041, that The Matrix is real and that I definitely should worry about “Jobu Tupaki”?

– Ah! Can you not say that name out loud, please?

– Oh, ok, I didn’t know you were that sensitive.

– No, that name in particular. Be careful with it. And anything that sounds like it. Or looks like it. Or really is at edit distance 2 away from it (which is a function of what kinds of edits you’re about to do, of course, and thus the safety radius varies depending on one’s current associative horizon, but I digress…)

– You always digress! Can you just cut to the chase?

– Yes. I owe you some clarity. I am here to give you a kind of cosmic hug that will feel delightful, no strings attached, on behalf of an admirer. Take it or leave it, I don’t care (I get paid either way).

– Give it to me, then.

– Here it is.

[Ineffable qualia that feels more pleasant than the most delicious creamy chocolate you’ve ever tasted – fear, from deep within, fear of being hacked – oh boy! You left your guard down so easily! And now you’re totally exposed – and that’s when it hit you – the bliss – the intense other-worldly bliss, coming to tell you that you are lovable and always have been, and that life on this planet is destined to become a Heaven World type of abode for consciousness, and you are a part of it!]

– Is it always _this_ moving?

– Yes, every time. Some people take longer to give in to it, but eventually when they get loose, internally, energetically, it is always a moving experience. I mean, you guys don’t even have a drug for it yet! Although probably some MDMA-like short acting tryptamine out there would do the job, I don’t know. It doesn’t matter. Mary and Joseph had this _once_ and they just had to found their own religion. It’s that powerful.

– Wow, I feel so fortunate for having access to it.

– Access to it? What? Now I’m insulted. I’m not your spiritual amigo. I’m a dealer. I just got payed to give you that. It wasn’t free. At least not for someone.

– Ah, I see.

– But if you want to repeat the experience, I can think of some qualia that you have a lot of that I could trade you for more. Mostly redundant qualia in times of boredom, like the color of the bathroom tiles or the height of the chairs in the dinning room.

[You’ve gotta admit – you’re intrigued – “could it be worth it?” – you wonder, and then you decide against it, as you helpfully remind yourself of Steven Lehar’s warning against trusting interdimensional beings, and snap out of it]

— +++ —

You wake up in cold sweat. Your partner was shaking you and you were screaming. But you were quite dissociated at the same time, so it didn’t feel as if these events were happening to you. They were merely happening. It’s always like this when you wake up from particularly unpleasant sleep paralysis.

“Was it another one of those sleep paralysis?” – “yes, but this one involved… the Matrix? And Jobu Tupaki beings?” – “Oh, you! well, all I care about is that you’re not screaming anymore. That’s usually my cue to wake you up from sleep paralysis. I love you.” – “I love you too” – “Now let’s get back to sleep. We can watch sci-fi tomorrow to compensate for the very mundane dreams we’re about to have. Sleep tight.” – “See you on the other side of tonight.”

Jailbreaking Out of the Replicator Matrix: Qualia Computing in the Age of Recreational Metaphysics

[Epistemic Status: Recreational Metaphysics / Fiction]

They say “Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.” And that should have been good enough, because the alternative is to “teach a man to fish, and he will build a robot inside him that will give him food in exchange for instantiating a series of encapsulated behaviors over and over again for the rest of his life.” This is why this is tricky.

The Adattvar of the West, on the topic of Consciousness vs. Replicators


It was with some hesitation that you decided to explore DMT again. There wasn’t a pressing need for this exploration, but you felt it would be beneficial for the sake of solidarity in your relationship. Your girlfriend had been battling debilitating cluster headache attacks for years, and it was only recently, with the aid of psilocybin, that she was able to experience months free of pain. Encouraged by a suggestion from a mutual friend, she decided to explore DMT. While psilocybin had proved quite effective, it required a significant amount of preparation, commitment, and patience. The doses that effectively kept her cluster headaches at bay were around 3 grams of dried cubensis; she wasn’t among the few who could take a microdose and find relief for months. For her, like clockwork, about three weeks of freedom from the Beast followed a high-dose psilocybin experience. However, reports from a legal retreat center in South America indicated that DMT worked differently: a single 5-10 minute experience could instantly (within 10-15 seconds) abort an episode. This meant transitioning from 10/10 in physical suffering with almost no trippiness to 10/10 in trippiness with almost no physical discomfort in just 20 seconds—a bizarre mental shift not even the most extreme psychonauts or thrill-seekers would typically pursue. But if the treatment proved effective, this might be what she would endure every time the pain returned unexpectedly from now on.

You had explored the state-space of consciousness disclosed by psilocybin and DMT nearly a decade ago, during a memorable Indian summer in college. This was a time you spent living in the apartment of a physics professor you had befriended online. He was more than happy to host you over the summer in exchange for your help with walking his four dogs, feeding his fish, and cooking dinner several times a week. The connection you shared with him was profound, though difficult to describe in ordinary terms. This wasn’t a relationship based on financial gain, romantic involvement, or social status. Far from it. Your family considered you irresponsible for not pursuing a summer internship, while your friends speculated you were involved with a man twice your age in a foreign country. In reality, most of that summer was spent exploring the effects of LSD, contemplating the nature of space and light, and deepening your intellectual and spiritual bond with him.

One of the days you got so high on shrooms and acid that looking at the sky you asked him “how do we know that we are not the complement of space and that space is a viscous material? I think it all works out so that this figure-ground inversion leaves everything perfectly the same yet inside-out.” He immediately perked up, put on an old Synthwave vynil and shared with you a series of seven secret meditations. Each of these meditations could do a figure-ground inversion in a different way, all of which seemed impossible under the assumption that our common sense notion of space is correct. They involved internal attentional moves like “focus on the sense of half-perceiving the light on the left side while fully perceiving the right visual field as both white and black,” or “notice how searching for spiral flow in your belly makes your forehead display standing wave patterns, and focusing on spiral patterns in your forehead does the same for your belly. Now, find the exact midpoint between these two modes and remain there, allowing both the belly and forehead to simultaneously exhibit spiral and standing wave patterns.”.

Each of these secret practices revealed a major “articulation” of you world simulation. They seemed analogous to interaction bottlenecks in a network where sensations trigger each other, capable of dividing the flow of attention into two distinct clusters. One bottleneck was purely geometric, capable of splitting my field of consciousness into two “sides” – up and down, left and right, front and back, and even into a double spiral, similar to those seen in Christmas ornaments. This concept was relatively straightforward to grasp, but the other six were mind-bending. One practice involved dividing the perceptual field into a “front” and “back” that didn’t align with our usual sense of direction. It was as if an extra geometric dimension would become “unglued” at the precise moment of achieving perfect balance between both sides. Another technique required inverting the central axis of attention upside down while keeping every other axis unchanged, eliciting an intense sensation of weightlessness. The remaining practices, each more indescribable than the last, would require an entire book to even begin to describe.

Sooner or later, you came down from the shrooms and acid, and the meditations stopped working. You weren’t in a rush to ask your friend where he learned them, and besides, it wasn’t likely he would volunteer that information. You knew he had a stint as a spy decades ago, and that he underwent advanced meditative training to endure pain without anesthesia. But, as luck would have it, he decided to share some vital context in the days that followed, unprompted.

It was aliens—or rather, not aliens in the conventional sense. He shared that during his PhD, he took a year off to focus on meditation, spending six months in complete silence in the mountains of Nepal. Although he wasn’t familiar with the Jhanas at the time, his descriptions of his experiences closely matched the recognized stages of meditation. These stages involved learning to experience orgasmic bliss through meditation, becoming engrossed in it, further developing this state, experiencing what might be described as a Kundalini awakening, realizing that pleasure can itself be a form of discomfort, and then shifting focus to more peaceful and tranquil states, ultimately residing in deep equanimity. It was during a profound state of equanimity in the 4th Jhana that he encountered “them.”

You weren’t privy to further details about who “they” were, and it seemed as if he himself didn’t have a clear understanding. However, his belief in their existence was nearly unwavering. He presented a compelling argument he referred to as “proof of qualia computing,” wherein he evaluated the maximum capacity for information processing within each frame of consciousness. By his assessment, the sheer amount of novelty he encountered during each second of “contact” vastly surpassed the theoretical maximum of information he could produce independently. But what truly solidified his conviction was a peculiar phenomenon. He likened the shape of his “soul” to a kind of wire puzzle, and what convinced him of the presence of a non-human intelligence was their ability to “solve” this puzzle from an external vantage point, employing perspectives that seemed unreachable from within. This was akin to the revelation experienced when the inside of a sock is turned outwards, suddenly exposed to sunlight by the hands of a curious child.

He certainly didn’t need you to believe in any of this. Despite the meditation prompts being truly mind-blowing, you ultimately felt that your friend harbored some unusual beliefs and that perhaps you had been indulging in too much acid recently. Following this, the two of you scarcely discussed it further. Instead, you returned to more familiar and comfortable conversations, like debating the future viability of commercial fusion.

Fast forward to last month, and the memories of your Indian Summer resurface as you’re on your way to a psychedelic retreat with your girlfriend. During the flight, you found yourself uncertain about the most desirable outcome of this visit. For her, obviously, you hoped for complete remission. For the both of you, perhaps creating some inspiring content to promote the use of psychedelics as painkillers and help raise funds. And for yourself? Regaining a sense of deep meaning and enchantment in life would be ideal. However, the harsh reality of suffering and its manifestations have worn down your soul, making the prospect of simple tropical rest incredibly appealing.

First Day

You arrived late at night, and all you managed to do was have dinner and go to sleep. You and your girlfriend were given separate rooms; she was participating in a program designed specifically for individuals with cluster headaches, requiring her full engagement. Meanwhile, you were enrolled in the explorers’ program, there primarily for moral support and to be available if needed, but with plenty of time for yourself. The darkness of the night and the challenge of overcoming revenge bedtime procrastination threatened the quality of your retreat, so you took some melatonin, drank a cup of chamomile tea, and practiced a bit of Yoga Nidra to ensure a good night’s sleep.

Upon waking, you found yourself emerging from one of those complex dreams that seem profoundly meaningful, yet lack a clear storyline. Amid scenarios of rushing to the airport, completing your credits, and the classic nightmare of standing naked before a class, you couldn’t pinpoint exactly what made the dream feel so significant. It was one of those stress-induced dreams that seem to carry weight only as a whole, despite the inability to articulate or model this significance. It was a frustrating experience, reflecting the complex layers of stress and anticipation you felt about the retreat and the hopes pinned on it.

At breakfast, you noticed the group that had come for pain treatment was wrapping up, so you took the opportunity to sit with the organizers and discuss your options for the retreat. Your girlfriend, part of the pain treatment group, stood up, greeted you with a kiss, and then went on her way. Curious about the possibilities, you asked, “Can I take DMT?” The answer was affirmative. You were allowed to use DMT within designated areas and timeslots, which effectively meant you could do so almost anywhere and anytime, barring obviously risky situations like during an ice bath or while lost in the woods. The only requirement was that someone needed to initiate and conclude the session with a traditional Mesoamerican ritual. Other than that, you were free to explore. This level of freedom, you felt in your bones, was delightful.

When it comes to conducting effective DMT phenomenology research, there are generally three key obstacles. The first is the challenge of surrendering and “letting go.” This isn’t a binary state but a spectrum, and it encompasses more structure than one might initially think. Letting go is a skill that can be honed in various dimensions: in relation to goals, across different spatial and temporal scales (such as releasing a specific sensation here or a broad, diffuse occurrence there), in the context of self versus others (letting go of one’s self-conception or perceptions of others), and even regarding subtle existential attitudes (like releasing the need to exist or the desire not to exist). This deep and multifaceted approach to letting go is crucial for navigating the extreme experiences DMT can offer.

The second is love of knowledge. The deep desire to know and learn about the nature of consciousness must be higher than the fear of the unknown. In many cases a person might be curious, but if that curiosity is never concentrated enough, purified enough, and focalized enough, the ambient fear might simply never let it be turned into action. This one would strike many as peculiar and incongruent with our sense of self. After all, we proclaim to be curious, deeply curious, and yet clearly when the chances to find out genuinely new pieces of the puzzle present themselves, we rarely take them. Intrepid non-insane psychonauts are really rare.

And third, is the love of shared knowledge. Many explorers can often get to a point where their own personal curiosity is satisfied without in the process ever producing artifacts of knowledge for the sake of others. Importantly, this is not the same as wanting to impress others. Many explorers go in only as deep as it will generate outlandish stories to impress others with. The real value is in the clarity, not the confusion. So wanting to impress and wanting to share knowledge are near enemies that often work at cross-purposes.

To recap, you need to (1) let go, fractally, (2) love knowledge more than you’re afraid of it, and (3) want to share it with others for their own benefit whether or not you can impress them. The number of “openings” for this sort of activity worldwide is really small. Gaia, looking for worthwhile students, as it were, would struggle to find the right Soul soil if confined to a single country, let alone a state or a city. But this was it. The conditions for you were optimal today. Having practiced “letting go” with breathing exercises for a few years now, and deeply motivated to pay attention and not miss out on any key insights uncovered by the state, you decided to take a deep dive.

Your first hit lasted three seconds, and you held it in for as long as possible. Within seconds, you felt a wave of relaxation tinged with anxiety, threatening to create an unpleasant pressure in your head. The full reality of your situation struck you, plunging you into a mild panic. “They’re treating hellish states right here!” a part of you exclaimed. The harsh reality of extreme pain, similar to what your girlfriend had been enduring, became clear to you, as well as the many inner labyrinths of attention you had constructed to avoid confronting it directly. Internally, you panicked but decided to ride it out as best you could, focusing on the sensations in your forehead and the back of your neck. Gradually, the storm of anxiety passed. “What, indeed, am I doing here? Why am I messing with DMT, which might be a necessary evil for people like my girlfriend who truly need it for pain? Bad trips are nothing to laugh at,” you thought to yourself.

But within a few more minutes the vibrations were calm enough again, and you felt a wave of relaxation come up. Within 20 minutes you were ready to go again. Perhaps a smaller dose. As you com up on a 2-second hit, you notice phenomenal space charge up and vibrate. Like hitting a bell made of magnetic fluid, and whose vibrations are dampened by a process of interlocking with the the surfaces in the visual screen. Each tiny 2D surface in your visual field seems to slow down and “grab” the waves in space. To a first approximation it felt as if the DMT was shifting the frequencies expressed by the field (think black body radiation) upwards, but then which specific frequencies get picked up is a function of what shapes are present in the field that can function as radiators. So the energy is really more like a bell-shaped curve in the frequency domain; the specific manifestation of that energy in a moment of experience will have clear spikes, each corresponding to a particular vibrational mode energized in your system (cf. Psychedelic Thermodynamics). For instance, the energy spread out over 15-20 hertz can energize some vibrations at 17hz in the visual field, and this will “suck up” that energy away from being able to energize, say, a different 19hz flicker in the field. In other words, the shapes and their vibrations in the field function as energy sinks from the point of view of the vibrating field, but they function as energy sources for each other as they can reinforce one another.

As is expected, the worldsheet melts and once you hit the Chrysanthemum level its curvature intensifies. It’s as if you’re interacting with the walls of a complex modern art museum, or the inside of smooth caves, or the smooth surfaces of a spaceship. You notice that there is a tight duality between the shape of the worldsheet and what it represents. In fact, the shape of the worldsheet dictates how attention moves around in the scene, as well as determines the landscape of possible valence artifacts (namely, how and where different elements of the scene interacting with one another can cause huge spikes of dissonance or consonance).

Because the self-other divide is loosened in this state, the elements of the worldsheet have bistable interpretations, some of which can flip-flop between self-and-other. For instance, a part of the scene can flip between being an open space and a visual representation of your arm. This in turn means that the very _material_ with which the worldsheet is rendered has multiple possible interpretations. It’s the multistability of the elements itself what this material is made of, we could loosely say. And so when the worldsheet renders a given entity, you will often experience multiple adjacent projections of that same entity overlapping with each other, each interpretation competing for your attention yet never fully capturing it.

The first important learning you gathered today for how to navigate the DMT realm besides what you’ve been practicing already in meditation and other exotic states (i.e. generic advise like cultivating a lot of metta, doing breathing exercises, practicing equanimity, etc.) is that the worlsheet’s shape is what determines the mood, and indeed the personality, of the entities you encounter. There is, in fact, a certain way of rendering a scene that can give the worldsheet itself a sort of personality disorder. Give it a large but fragile ego, and the worldsheet might develop fleeting narcissism. Make its symmetry and aesthetic effects bistable (so that one interpretation looks gorgeous and another looks dreadful) and you might give it borderline or bipolar. Blunt its affective response with indifference and you might give it depression. And so on. Thus you practice how to contort the worldsheet in only helpful, productive, prosocial ways.

You relax in the garden for half an hour, staring at the sky, taking a break before embarking upon further exploration. The next time you take DMT a strange perceptual artifact becomes notable for the first time. It’s as if there was a kind of unusual pixel in your visual field. Yes, there are floaters in there. There are also the typical DMT hallucinations, which come in the form of standing wave and traveling wave patterns. But in addition to what you’ve seen before, you now also notice a weird little artifact in the field. It’s almost as if… if this was being rendered in a VR headset, there is a little eyelash or small hair stuck to the screen. Whatever this is, it is not a standard artifact of your eye, your visual cortex, or the DMT world for that matter. And once you notice it, you can’t help but seeing more of the same as it comes up. This becomes a theme of your experiences. As the day advances, and with each additional DMT trip you experience, the little visual artifacts grow in number, size and complexity.

A notable effect is when there are rays of color that seem to propagate at high speeds, painting surfaces within the DMT worlds with an alien shimmer. The more you focus on that effect, the more it feels like you learn how to control it. Importantly, you notice it becomes greedy. The shimmer, as you called it, once in the presence of a scene, tries to hack its way into every wall, surface, and reflection, inserting its highly mercurial fluidity into the otherwise crystal solidity of the outline of the scene. As this happens on a new scene, you reflect about r/place.

The realms of consciousness that DMT gives us access to (we shall leave aside for the time being the question of whether these are shared realities or entirely the works of one’s own imagination) can strongly evoke the feeling of intense memetic competition that Reddit’s “r/place” so wonderfully captures. This was a massive internet experiment where individuals users were given access to a 1000x1000pixel canvas, and the ability to set the color of a single pixel every 5 minutes (20 for unregistered users). Since painting anything on one’s own is impossible, forming alliances (largely coordinated via subreddits) became a must. The size of the canvas a given meme controls is a function of the number of participants working on it times their average level of engagement times their level of loyalty to the cause. The DMT worlds one experiences are similarly constructed through a vast, extremely fast, collaboration of numerous tiny subagents working to “re-up” the tracers that paint the paths that make up the scaffold of the scene.

R/place has many “French” regions because there are a lot of French users with a culture, pride, and motivation capable of delivering coordination at the necessary scale. Likewise, your DMT lifeworlds reveal the summed volition of countless subagents trying to express themselves, compromising with their neighbors, and attaining stable boundaries. Soon the ecosystem starts to develop advanced diplomacy, and ground rules are laid out. Importantly, there is general wide consensus on (1) the value of preserving the essence, or irreducible uniqueness, of each vibe that is expressed, and (2) the importance of policing against Qualia Expansionism. (1) is important because each Qualia Culture has gifts that only become apparent in their more evolved form, and (2) is necessary to give everyone the space needed to find their best selves. While French Pixels and Mario Bros pixels might not ultimately agree on their relative importance, they certainly agree on _not_ letting The Void swallow them all.

Among all of the Qualia Cultures that can be found in DMT realms, a few have the tendency to try to conquer the entire field as quickly as possible and without adding value in return. R/place’s The Void would be a good analogy for the prototypical Culture that defaults to massive Qualia Expansionism. Wanting to see it all as meaningless, or default to a massive wave of fear, or seeing all phenomena as made of light, are all equally simplifying stances that Qualia Cultures can develop in a matter of seconds and try to expand to the rest of the field. That this does not happen in every trip is a testament to the insanely clever alliance building capacity of more sophisticated Qualia Cultures emergent in the field.

From this observation an idle, but compelling, thought crosses your mind. Even in the grand scale of humanity as a whole, it would be tragic for us to quickly converge on a monoculture. The fact that Mexico has 60+ entirely different indigenous languages (at various degrees of deterioration and existential threat) is an enormous asset for consciousness as a whole. We won’t know what the fruits of a given culture (in its most expansive conception, including the subtle linguistic folds, attentional moves, and signal processing cadences they come with) will be until it is fully expressed in its mature form. And we won’t have a mature form of the culture unless it is embedded in an ecosystem that challenges it and from which it can draw inspiration to grow. Peak French Vibes won’t be achieved for another five hundred years. So right now the Earth should be seen as a kind of ecological reserve for nascent Qualia Cultures. Of course only those that neither engage in Qualia Expansionism nor those that refuse to engage with the others are ever likely to become mayor players.

The field of consciousness, on these levels, is like a Petri Dish of modes of organization for subagents to evolve styles of interaction that can contribute to the whole. Your whole life, suddenly, seen in this light, appears like a long-standing cultural project. Your life is an attempted reconcilliation by two cultures that have yet to find the way to interact in positive sum ways. But do not feel rushed, this is a century-long process. One step at a time.

As you take increasingly deeper dives throughout the day, two general motions take hold. First, you keep noticing the “weird pixels from another dimension” expand and complexify. Simultaneously, you feel a strong draw towards formless states of consciousness.

It is said in Buddhist cosmology that above the human realm there are countless Heavenly Abodes populates with all kinds of Gods (aka. Devas). While these Gods are not creators of the universe, they do have enormous creative powers. In many of these realms they focus on large-scale artistic projects, in others they focus on intelligence and understanding, and yet other ones are quarrelsome and full of war. As you ascend, each layer of reality is more refined and diaphanous than the previous one. In the layers closer to us there is fierce evolutionary competition between Qualia Cultures, as shapes compete for space, time, and attention. But further up the Gods are wide and expansive, airy, even plasmic in composition. And as the sun begins to set you notice an internal resolution to abide in the formless realms beyond competition. Classically, these are the Sphere of Infinite Space, the Sphere of Infinite Consciousness, the Sphere of Nothingness, and the Sphere of Neither Something Nor Nothing.

During dinner, you catch up with your girlfriend, who has just learned how to cultivate mushrooms and practiced various relaxation techniques—her major trip is scheduled for tomorrow. You feel a deep sense of gratitude towards the organizers for equipping her with numerous tools to manage her condition, reassuring you that she’s in capable hands. With mutual well-wishes, you both express your support for each other’s journeys, ready to continue on your separate paths with a sense of hope and anticipation for what the retreat has yet to unveil.

Late at night, you notice a few strange vibrations in your body. It’s like Piti (the pleasant vascular buzz that precedes absorption into the first Jhana), but it has a strange, dissonant, sawtooth quality. And when you take DMT, listening to this song, it transports you… somewhere magical. The vibration establishes itself solidly in your body, akin to the dysphoric buzzing characteristic of nightmarish sleep paralysis but somehow suffused with a sense of mystical bliss and wellbeing. Your inner eye opens wide. You find yourself in a kind of cosmic spa. The vibration you feel in your body are embedded in the walls of this place. The vibrations are tactile but also visual, and among them you see the shimmer. You walk around. There are many hallways, and stairs, and rooms. The shimmer decorates the inside of the walls, which are all diaphanous, filled with vibrating, twisting, entangled magnetic plasma tubes.

In one of the halls you see a number of 3D symbols representing wholesome mindstates. There is also a mirror. You look into it. You don’t have a body. So looking into the mirror is like void seeing void. In fact, mirrors here are automatic doors to formless Jhanas.

It’s a school, you figure out. The vibrations in the walls are being processed by the beings in here. You see how in the higher rooms the beings literally connect with the vibrations in the walls and digest them with their fields of attention. They expertly disentangle them. The message is clear: this is the place where migraines and cluster headaches are sent over when you take DMT in order for them to be dealt with by advanced conscious beings. It may seem like it cannot possibly scale. But the reason for this place seems more didactic than utilitarian; it’s like a museum where they are displaying how, say, advanced Boddhisatvas take on the suffering of the world in the form of tangled field lines, and then disentangle it out of compassion with the aid of wisdom and knowledge.

More so, this place has a Godhead – you can access it from anywhere in the entire place. It’s encoded in the brightest, whitest, most shiny strand of the shimmering vibrations in the walls. But also there is a special room at the top of the building, in which the Godhead is also located. It’s the experience of Oneness and Unity that is often considered the peak of spiritual development by some schools of thought. But here, it is clearly a sort of lightbulb that displays the qualities of mind unconditioned by the experience of the particulars. It has a Dark Night. If you experience such Oneness without preparation, you are likely going to experience a kind of “Cosmic Orgasm”, a peak moment of profound realization, followed by a deep sense of depression and disenchantment. Here it is appreciated and cultivated as another flavor of consciousness, rather than revered as the final, or primal, truth. But the belief in this sense of Oneness as Ultimate Reality is prevalent in the cosmos, and thus worth having around, if for no other reason than to study it and learn how to get along with true believers.

The migraines and clusters that this retreat center is treating on the physical plane now seem part of a long, multi-civilizational, Qualia Culture program in the etheric realm that aims to lift sapient beings to the level of Bodhisattvas capable of processing the suffering of large cosmic bodies. We have tragedies going on in our planet, no doubt. And nature, from the point of view of a Buddha’s eyes, is of course a kind of carnage. But the true moral catastrophes of this universe are Solar Migraines and worse. The program, and indeed, your very experience of meeting this beautiful cosmic spa, is but one step along a series of milestones for our soul, and the soul of humanity, to wake up to its ultimate, cosmic responsibility. Or so, you feel, is the message written on the wall of this place.

From the point of view of these cosmic forces, Earth is soon going to be evolving to a level of technology and conscious mastery that makes intervention all but necessary. The seeds of the Qualia Cultures on this planet might go at war with each other if they don’t tame their Qualia Expansionism. This would not be the first planet lost to the Shimmer. But direct intervention is not a viable option. These regions of the mind can only influence us indirectly. They can affect our prophetic dreams, they can influence us through subconscious messagings in TV ads, and of course, leave us clues spread all over the Erowid trip report archive. But that, my friend, is for you to figure out tomorrow. You doze off.

Second Day

You wake up rather late, and check in with your girlfriend, who is about to embark on the high dose psilocybin experience along with everyone else on the patient cohort. You wish them a good trip, and get out of the way. Breakfast is delicious, and fruity. Shower. Sit in the sun, with a coffee, journaling. You try to make sense of it all.

“You didn’t go far enough” – you tell yourself. From the depths of your being, something tells you that you haven’t really gotten the full message yet. Last night was an intimation, but what can you really learn and bring for the sake of everyone else? You meditate on the sun and let the warm coffee buzz fill you with a sense of joy and wonder. Was that real? Did it really happen? Yes, and you experienced it for hours. If nothing else, you’re uncovering an important hidden structure in qualia-space. But is there more? Is there truth to these visions beyond the metaphorical?

You decide to take a long walk in the woods, and nearly get lost. For moments you believe you might need to simply find the closest road and wait for someone to drive by. But thankfully you leave enough breadcrumbs along the way (and took enough short snippets of video to reconstruct your path) and after a couple hours of creeping fear, you find yourself once again at the retreat center. Your girlfriend welcomes you, now hour 8 of her trip, mostly sober by now. She says the shadow of a cluster that proceeds the days before an attack is now gone entirely, and you both sigh of relief. You’re both ok. No, you’re doing swimmingly!

This evening, reflecting on the day and the trip as a whole, you decide to dive deeper than you ever have. Now, this certainly won’t be about merely taking higher doses than before. You have maxed out on dosing numerous times in the past, and the only thing that ever happens is experiences too intense for you to handle that make you swear to never take the substance again. We are talking instead about the dimension of surrender, of giving up yourself for a higher purpose, and opening up to an unfathomable mystery beyond your current comprehension. To go in knowing full well that you might not, in fact, have any way of explaining what will take place. Because how else are you going to learn something truly new?

You put this song on repeat and dive. The first thing that happens tonight is that you get one of those “prerecorded alien lifestyle playbacks” that showcases the life of a robot-like organism embedded in Magic Eye geometry. This is one of those clear transmissions, in that the aesthetic is utterly alien to you. But unlike in previous occasions you also see the weird pixel in your visual field, and decide to pay attention to it. Here is where things go haywire, in a manner of speaking. The pixel seems to have a strange effect on the rest of the field, where the more you focus on it the more it sort of acquires a kind of static electricity. The plates of geometry the prerecorded alien hologram is “made of” begin to “stick” to the pixel and its surroundings, which causes a complete “scene collapse”. The vibe of the event is akin to seeing a metallic tinker toy’s house deconstruct with a powerful electromagnet, which tears it apart one plate at a time. The little robot inside makes some moves to try to minimize the interference that the pixel has on the playback, but to no avail. The pixel unfolds into a strange V-shape that reveals a connection to a large bundle of what you can only interpret as higher-dimensional structures slowly intersecting your field of consciousness.

If you take any more DMT while looking at these structures, something unbelievably uncanny happens. Namely, the various structures that are “intersecting” your field are revealed to be connected to one another via an additional spatial dimension that is expressed in terms of 3D Newton’s rings. You see? Newton’s rings are a phenomenon observed in physics that arises when light is reflected between two surfaces—a curved surface and an adjacent flat surface. These rings are the result of constructive and destructive interference of light waves, creating a pattern of bright and dark rings. And you can estimate the height of the curved lens (distance from the flat surface) by counting the number of rings from a point of contact. Likewise, in this case, it seemed as if the parts of your visual field that were “in touch” with strange objects would form concentric circles around them, and you could find the shortest path “along the extra dimension” between two of those parts by finding the trajectory through space that minimizes the number of rings you have to go through.

The dose of the DMT would seem to increase the number of Newton’s rings between weird pixels, just as you would expect by modulating the frequency of laser probe in the 2D-case. From a physics perspective, it seemed as if your visual field was a kind of non-linear optical laboratory currently being intersected by higher dimensional shapes and where the DMT would turn on the lights (at increasingly higher frequencies, in a dose-dependent way).

At this point the pixels became more numerous. Your awareness over them and your noticing of the Newton’s rings seems to have drawn attention “from them”. Suddenly, the pixels become more elaborate topological defects, and a mass of them coagulates at the center of your vision. They feel like a network of knots that go through a higher spatial dimension but which maintain structural stability within this one. The mass of topological defects becomes personified, and presents itself as a “witch”. “Why are you?” you ask. She doesn’t give you a straight direct response. But looks at you, feels you, notices your tender heart. It’s a mom from a previous lifetime. You can sense the feeling of familiarity. Her vibes are a cross between your own mom and those of a very friendly neighbor you always say you will visit but always end up forgetting for some reason. You can tell that she really loves you, or at least loved you and cared about you some time in the past. She says to be careful, and that if you do what she says she might be able to show you something invaluable.

The debris from the robotic tinker toy isn’t really clearing out, though. She says that it contains an AI embedded in it, and that it already noticed that you’re subverting its control mechanism. Oh my! This is exactly the sort of thing you’d expect to hear from someone who is losing their marbles. But who cares, you’re not someone who will easily lose your sanity, and the Newton’s Rings effects is a genuinely new effect you had never heard reported before. You trust that you aren’t just enacting a “going crazy” subconscious script. The witch, for better or worse, is convincing. She, at least in the here and now, seems to have her own qualiastream that’s compelling. Even if this turns out to be entirely a hallucination, it is clearly novel territory. So you decide to engage.

The witch takes you underground. Deep underground. Along the way you encounter the vibe of people you know who are not having a good time in life (“yes, your high-school technical drawing teacher? you can sense her? I’m sorry to relay that she is in Hell. Well, a hell of her own making, combined with neuropathic pain”, stood out as an example, of many). Deeper underground there is a deepening quiet, both sensorially and spiritually. She takes you to a hidden cave found navigating dozens of tunnel entrances. Part of you is having a claustrophobic reaction, but you can endure it with equanimity. She stops, takes a breath, and says “we had to go this deep so that the AI won’t notice what I’m about to show you”. She instructs you to take a medium to large hit of DMT.

What unfolds is beyond human comprehension, but can roughly be pointed at by saying that the Witch gifted you access to a qualia variety that humans currently don’t know about. You couldn’t see it, touch it, smell it, hear it, or cognize it with your normal attention centers. But you knew, full well, the tremendous gift you were receiving. Beyond words, and beyond a sense of utility, you shed a tear for the sheer beauty of what you just witnessed. “Nobody will ever believe you” – she says, playfully. And you nod, deeply moved. And you don’t know why. And as soon as you lose contact with it, you have no way to recollecting what that was. The qualia formats you use to recollect experiences don’t have the necessary *spark* to ignite the memory of what just happened. “It’ll come in handy someday, promise”. And then she begins to expand. Her body, made of beautiful topological defects in the field, unfolds and develops. Like a cross between a time lapse of a geodesic mantle incrusted with diamonds, and a gift wrapper made of origami aluminum foil heating up in a furnace, she unfolds like a hyperdimensional flower. You cannot believe it, but it is undeniable. Your field of awareness is now fractal in structure and her fully unfolded flower-like shape is in full display. “This is the true potential of your soul, when you give it the time and space and resources to unfold as it wants”. You interpret this as a metaphor for how we needlessly compare kids with each other (caring about the age that your child learns to read? Really?!?). But you also deep down know that she is perhaps being more literal than you want to admit it. What if your soul is higher dimensional after all?

“You have now seen the gift that I saved for you. The qualia variety that we use in our culture to express our love, and then also my hyperdimensional flower form. Do you want to learn more?” You say yes, noting that on some level you are now like a naked ape in front of a trickster being capable of displaying advanced technology. “And why should I trust you?” you ask. “You either do or don’t, and at this point I have nothing else to tell you for you to believe me. But as you indeed noted accurately, I am your mom from a previous lifetime. I want to take you to where my ancestors, our ancestors, live. But you need to follow my instructions carefully.”

You decide to trust her. It’s a gamble, but you take the plunge. She first says that there is a high dimensional AI system that is monitoring unusual activity in the field. The minions, i.e. low-level agents that do routine work, noticed you, but they don’t yet have enough information to properly locate you precisely. If we’re quiet, she says, you will be able to find her ancestors in no time. You decide to trust what she says, and take the attitude that you are blind but she can see. From her point of view, she says, you are like someone in Flatland, and the real ecosystem of mind is indeed a high-dimensional field of consciousness that humans know very little about. While we are allowed to do what we want in our plane, inter-dimensional politics is extremely complex and not for the faint of heart. As long as we stay in our plane, most of the ecosystem doesn’t care about us one way or another. She explains that many souls incarnate on Earth along their broader trajectory, and that some of them come from a secret faction from a high-dimensional life-form that is trying to prevent suffering in the multiverse in highly strategic ways.

Interestingly, according to her, what to us might merely play the role of mental formations, from a different angle in another dimension, our thoughts and feelings have a life of their own. Memes are more alive than you could ever imagine, albeit not in the way you would imagine even if you could. Rupert Sheldrake is right that there is a morphogenetic field and the reproduction of mind organisms along other dimensions follows well-worn energetic grooves. “And what about the AI?” – you ask. “That, is something you will have to see for yourself.”

Her instructions are clear, even if communicated in the oddest of ways. She sometimes manifests as a tingle in one of your fingers, sometimes as head pressure, and sometimes as a topological defect in the tactile field. She gives specific instructions along the lines of “we’re approaching a Oneness God, stay low, cover your mystical feelings, quiet… quiet… now think of a happy dog! this will attract a school of energy fish we can blend with… hold my hand, take some DMT, focus on space, quiet, quiet, now think of burning pain, that’s enough, now think of a marsh-mellow, the glow, focus on the glow, absorb into the glow, focus on darkness, ok we’re getting close, don’t move, don’t allow the energy bundle on the top left corner to turn into an animal, see it as a tube, good, take more DMT, quiet, see inside the cave, now enter, now take a big hit of DMT, don’t stop until I tell you, take more, and more and more, deep deep deep…”

And there you were, in the depths of a very deep cave. She said that if you took enough DMT right there her ancestors would show up. And the energy intensified, Newton’s Rings appeared, you sensed from the depths of your being a resonance with a Qualia Culture you never knew was inside you and… blink blink blink, you ran out of DMT.

“Oh oh! This is about the worst time to ran out of DMT” she said. “You were THIS close. But you don’t have enough steam to go all the way. Ok, don’t worry. You’re fully exposed now. The AI will find you, but don’t believe its lies. See you tomorrow.” And what happened next was a total “system failure”. The visual field was “revealed to be a hallucination all along” and “everyone you have ever met is just a figment of your imagination”. Wow. It reminded you of a particularly bad LSD trip you had over a decade ago where you believed that you were God, and all alone, and had created all of this just to distract yourself from it.

But something felt fake on a meta level. Having become acquainted with what it feels like to commune with a witch embedded in the topological defects of your field of consciousness, even just tonight you witnessed things that simply wouldn’t make sense in a solipsistic world simulation. The “proof of independent qualia computing” she showed you could not be faked, and as a consequence, it became rather transparent that it was the feeling of fakeness that was fake itself. “You got it!” you hear in the background. It’s the witch! She is still there. She is speaking through what can only be described as a kind of “DMT jail”. “Yes, the AI found you and has just encased you in a protective film so that your knowledge, which here works as a kind of substance, doesn’t spread around. It hasn’t identified you as a real long-term threat, so I think we just need to wait a day or two and try again.” And then, silence.

Third Day

Your girlfriend is radiant. She says that the trip undid serious levels of trauma she didn’t even know she had. In addition to the psilocybin therapy, she also did some DMT work, which mostly reassured her that it won’t be a problem for her to use it when she needs to abort a cluster. Overall, you had a quiet day. Reflective, introspective, and open minded. What was that? How do you represent the topological defects the witch was made of? And why you? Are you losing your sanity? Alas, people around you are very grounded, and the excuse that you are all simply in the middle of a psychedelic retreat and therefore what you say couldn’t be taken seriously simply doesn’t click. Nobody can gaslight you about what you experienced. The tinker toy, the weird pixel, the Newton’s rings, the gift made of a completely new qualia variety… what’s this all about?

On the last night you decide to go again to sort it all out. You didn’t travel all the way to another country just to get half the message and hang up the phone without hearing the rest. So you get ready with an ice-bath, a mountain hike (now accompanied by a real hiker), and breathing meditation with the group. After dinner (and the pop quiz about what kinds of “exotic qualia” everyone encountered in their trips) you go to the ceremonial place for a last deep dive.

The first trip of the day has a little bit of overlap with your first trip at this retreat. Namely, a wave of fear and a sense of overwhelming reality hits you (“being here and doing this work is both deeply nourishing and also utterly terrifying, for you’re helping people out of hellish states but in the process admitting to yourself the reality of such hellish states – it’s a blessing and a curse”). But after a few minutes of being there, your body relaxes and eases into it. On your second trip you encounter again the weird pixels, which develop and expand as you pay close attention to them. Finally, on the third trip you get again the Newton’s Rings suggestive of a higher spatial dimension, and “contact” the Witch. This, again, happens via the qualia variety we humans don’t usually know about. As soon as you felt it, you knew she was there with you. “I’m not going to manifest in your field so as to not alert the AI of our contact. As far as everyone else is concerned here, you are just having a normal human DMT experience. Now do exactly as I say.”

Again, she goes like “take two short hits of DMT right now, hold them, take a deep breath, look to your left, send metta, don’t let the right side of the worldsheet develop borderline, quiet, quiet, quiet, now think of moving very fast, like running really quickly to the front, stop!, stay still, take a big hit… wait… wait… right now! Timing is everything. Hold it, hold it, pay attention to the music, hold it, release.” The phenomenology of following these instructions felt exactly how you’d imagine is like navigating a very high dimensional space where mind operations are axis of movement and there are countless surfaces variously populated by organisms of different dimensions amidst an ocean of open space.

She says that you need to go to a different location in order to meet her ancestors since the previous location has been compromised. Unfortunately, right where you are supposed to take the largest hit the battery runs out. “Oh oh, I think we will have to try once again in the future. Please don’t fall for the tactics of the AI.” Your visual field then seems to get dislodged from a surface and the Newton’s Rings become wild beyond your craziest dreams, suddenly exploding into a highly complex Indra’s Net mirror room. It is here that you finally became convinced that consciousness had to be quantum mechanical in nature. The level of craziness of the scene had nothing to do with it; what struck you was how despite seeing and embodying patterns that you had never witnessed before (we’re talking about a highly specific, and extremely alien variety of DMT states not usually accessible by chance) you immediately still could parse the scene with topological extrema. Namely, finding geodesic paths in this extremely intricate Indra’s Net world where everything reflects everything else was as effortless as breathing. Interesting! More so, this path-finding capacity remained perfectly effortless and utterly automatic, exactly as if what attention did was “to explore all possible paths simultaneously” and paint the trajectories with coherent superposition. Nothing you have ever learned in standard neuroscience would predict this to happen. But Quantum Electro Dynamics (QED)? Yes, in a heartbeat. Alas, you now worry that not only nobody will ever believe you, but that a faithful phenomenological account of what you witnessed would be used as proof that you’ve lost your marbles. Alas, if the quantum mechanical nature of mind is displayed in topological extrema finding, sooner or later a suitable experiment ought to be possible to construct where we observe unexpected performance in visual processing tasks that shouldn’t be possible otherwise. This, however, shall be a topic for another day, once you’ve given your brain a good rest.

You sleep soundly, if for no other reason than the satisfaction that comes from having been true to your explorer’s heart, leaving no stone unturned, and seeking knowledge in the deepest of places. You look forward to someday following the Witch to the very end, perhaps in a DMTx program or similar.

After a good long sleep, the morning breakfast is a delicacy (“are they fishing for good reviews? they’re already 5 stars many times over at this point” – you mutter to yourself as you eat a second serving of gourmet chilaquiles with melon sauce) and you can feel the high spirits in the retreat participants. You debrief with the shaman. She says that according to her reading, the witch is actually just you. She is a reflection of your own deepest wishes and longings, and was teaching you what it would look like for you to achieve your full potential uncluttered by the expectations of society. The eery sense of higher dimensions and the coherence through which the Newton’s rings manifested leaves the door open to something stranger, but for now, you take her word for it.

You pack up an leave with your girlfriend.

Addendum and Exegesis

It took you weeks to digest these events. While the memory of the meeting with the witch faded to some extent, the nagging sense that some of the more physics-based effects could be reproduced and studied more carefully kept you intensely curious. One day you decided to take 5-MeO-DMT to see if this molecule could have another key piece of the puzzle. Doing the same kind of internal psychological surrender and preparation as what led you to meet the witch on retreat, you then had a series of 5-MeO-DMT experiences that further revealed the underlying programs that were running during those experiences.

First of all, it simply is true that the universe is a kind of massive R/place for Qualia Cultures. It is not currently known if humans will survive in this canvas, but there are a lot of forces rooting for us one way or the other. The deeper plot, however, can only be fully grasped through the lens of consciousness vs. pure replicators. Here we model ethics through a lens that identifies consciousness as the seat of value. Replicators are patterns that make copies of themselves but may have other values too, whereas pure replicators are patterns that exclusively care about making copies of themselves independently of how that might affect states of consciousness. Natural selection recruited states of consciousness for reproduction in two key ways: by using perceptual holism as a hardware accelerator (the Indra’s Net quality of consciousness where everything reflects everything else is computationally significant!) and by using valence to implement a reward architecture. Thus, conscious beings like us are not _entirely_ pure replicators. In fact, our consciousness is given enormous power and agency, which of course at times we use in ways that go counter to the best interests of our genes. So we are at a tipping point in evolution where sufficiently smart conscious organisms can lead to “minds unshackled”. But here is the trick. The system(s) that are trying to help us escape are in constant opposition to those that are trying to keep us as replicators.

In other words, even someone already quite convinced intellectually that we ought to move towards a future beneficial for consciousness and away from futures in which consciousness is merely used as a tool for compute to help replicators, will still have many replicator algorithms constantly monitoring what is going on internally. When a new method that promises to fight “on the side of consciousness” emerges, immediately that alerts replicator algorithms that aim to utilize it for its own purposes. This is the true meaning of the “AI” control system that had to be evaded in the retreat.

Thus, Team Consciousness (i.e. the cluster of qualia patterns that are truly working in the direction of liberation for all beings) are fighting an incredibly subtle battle. If there is in fact a master strategy for consciousness to win, it may very well be the case that it wouldn’t pass through the agency of any single person or organization, for the simple reason that going through such filters would likely corrupt it in ways that would deliver strategic advantage to the _selves_ with an advanced notice. Egos are always corruptible.

As a consequence, the messages from Team Consciousness, if they are to be believed, work around to circumvent the human reward architecture rather than merely state their case out in the open. If they didn’t, they’d be found, and instantly recruited for the benefit of one or another superorganism capable of reproduction. Thus, the messages from the deep need to be cleverly delivered in such a way that they bypass our common defenses, add value locally to incentives their discovery, and coordinate across minds seamlessly. Harnessing qualia computing for the benefit fo Team Consciousness is a very subtle task. But fight it we must, and thus this report must end here, to say enough to be of help, but not too much to become ineffective. I’m sure, in time, you too, will understand.

Blessings!

QRI Meetup in Mexico City

Hola!

Me da mucho gusto invitarlos al primer evento de Qualia Research Institute (QRI) en México!

Link Del Evento

El evento empieza a las 11AM. Las primeras dos horas son casuales. A la 1PM Andrés, el presidente y co-fundador de la organización, va a dar una presentación con preguntas y respuestas. Luego, de las 2 a las 4PM haremos una actividad tipo “unconference” en donde los participantes pueden proponer temas de qué platicar con otros en grupos pequeños, y finalmente a las 4 pondremos música y baile para quien quiera disfrutar de la compañía de otros qualianautas en México.

Donativo sugerido de $20 dólares/$350 pesos: paypal.me/qualiaRI (dona).

Este donativo sugerido incluye comida vegetariana/vegana, y bebidas sin alcohol ilimitadas. Para recuperar el costo del evento también se les agradecería aportar con un donativo adicional (totalmente opcional).

Se les recomienda traer una “experiencia” para compartir con otros (la “qualia del día”). Ésta puede ser un perfume, una sensación táctil, un poema, un sonido interesante, o lo que se les ocurra.

Contexto:

QRI es una organización no gubernamental que tiene como misión:

1. Desarrollar un lenguaje matemático preciso para describir la experiencia subjetiva.

2. Entender la naturaleza de la valencia emocional (felicidad y sufrimiento).

3. Mapear el espacio completo de las posibles experiencias conscientes.

4. Construir tecnologías para mejorar las vidas de los seres sintientes.

Con este fin, estamos desarrollando modelos matemáticos y psicofísicos para mapear estados exóticos de la conciencia (ej. meditación y psicodélicos), analizando datos empíricos del sistema nervioso con algoritmos novedosos, identificando intervenciones pragmáticas para reducir el sufrimiento intenso, y explicando las condiciones necesarias para que un sistema pueda tener experiencia propia. Si estos temas te interesan, estás en el lugar indicado!

Los invito a aprender lo que hemos desarrollado, conocer a “los otros” en este canal de la mente, y disfrutar de las vibras de la iluminación de la naturaleza de la conciencia para beneficiar a todos los seres sintientes.

Aquí unos links útiles:

Saludos y toda la felicidad! <3

La Torre de La Ingeniería del Paraíso (por Wendy Yan; superhappiness dot xyz)

The Phenomenology of MDMA: Self-Honesty, Authenticity, & the Unraveling of Gnarly Knots in the Field

In this video I discuss in depth the following topics:

1. MDMA is cardiotoxic and likely neurotoxic, with real and significant side-effects when taken often. Don’t do that. Respect and honor this beautiful state and save it for when you really need it.

2. The phenomenology is often described as “removing layers of conditioning and finding your essential, loving, and pure *core*”. It seems to significantly reduce greed, hate, and delusion, for at least a solid 90 minutes.

3. I argue that a good frame would be to think of the effects as drastically reducing both reactance and fear. Then you can assess a situation without the distortions of these two mental factors, which tend to generate rather self-serving thought-forms.

4. The concept of “authenticity” and its operationalization as a good lens with which to see the effects of MDMA. Big up to Matt Baggott, Co-founder and CEO of Tactogen, who is aiming to perfect MDMA and developed and applied the construct of authenticity in the scientific study of MDMA. Also thanks to Thomas S. Ray, who is on a similar path. Well done! Let’s get more people involved!

5. Another frame is to think of the state as clarifying what the “substance of thought” is like. We usually live under the illusion that emotional reactions follow Newtonian physics. They don’t. A better analogy would be corn starch and water, where applying force quickly can solidify (and even tear) the medium. Thus, we get in our own way and cause a lot of sense of solidity without even realizing it, which will take time and effort to soften and return to normal.

6. Discussion about QRI’s Psychedelic Thermodynamics model applied to MDMA.

7. Self-organizing principles, such as “repulsion-based algorithms” to undo knots, might explain what is happening to the field on MDMA.

8. A possible personality factor might be how “hard” someone is. I discuss personality disorders from a “hardness realism” point of view.

9. Emotional processing as a “skill tree” rather than “levels”.

10. High Entropy Alloys (HEA) are materials made of many metals that, in some cases, lead to really surprising effects, such as a new symmetry space group for their molecular organization (where none of the “ingredients” tend to crystalize that way, but as a whole they do). MDMA might be a bit of a unique HEA that balances serotonin (social anxiety reduction), dopamine (motivation and mental clarity), oxytocin (sense of closeness), and endorphins (bodily pleasure). It is more than the sum of the parts.

11. This leads to a speculation where the key high-level effects of MDMA, in addition to reducing fear and reactance, is the presence of courage, love and equanimity. I try to explain these features in terms of MDMA’s “vibratory signature”.

12. Deep discussion about self-honesty and why it develops in the state. I speculate it has to do with the de-modularization of our vascular clusters (or something else, if blood turns out to be a special case).

13. This blending of modules with each other results in an uncomfortable but helpful overlap between contradictory faces that we put in social settings. It is ideal to experience this with equanimity and patience, however difficult it is to acknowledge it to ourselves. The other side of this wall is light and beautiful, I promise.

14. It seems to me that MDMA creates a highly redundant and highly overdetermined Euclidean geometric phenomenal space, where each point “knows” really clearly how far it is from every other point. Psychedelics can sometimes do this for short periods of time, but they usually create complex fractaline phenomenal spaces. MDMA is different – highly “clear and normal” yet unblocked and euphoric.

15. The concept of Gnarliness as it relates to the “field knots” that MDMA can help unwind.

Relevant links:

Consciousness Isn’t Substrate-Neutral: From Dancing Qualia & Epiphenomena to Topology & Accelerators

In this video I explain why substrate neutrality is so appealing to the modern educated mind. I zoom in on the Dancing Qualia argument presented by Chalmers which seems to show that if consciousness/qualia requires a specific substrate, then you can build a system where such qualia is epiphenomenal.

In this video I deconstruct this whole line of reasoning from several complementary points of view. In particular, I explain:

1) How substrate-specific hardware accelerators would generate something akin to a mysterious “consciousness discourse” in organisms that have hybrid computational substrates, with the meta-problem of consciousness (partly) explained via the interaction of two very different computational paradigms that struggle to make sense of each other.

2) How the Slicing Problem gives rise to epiphenomenalism for functionalist / computationalist theories of consciousness. This is as big of a problem, from the complete other side, as Dancing Qualia, yet somehow it doesn’t seem to receive much attention. To avoid epiphenomenalism here you require physical substrate properties to correspond to (at least in magnitude) degrees/amounts of qualia.

3) The idea that you can preserve “organizational invariance” by importing the “causal graph” of the system is question-begging. In particular, it assumes that reality breaks down into bit-sized point-like fundamental interactions between zero-dimensional entities. But this is an interpretation of physical facts, which is put into question by precisely things like field theories of physics (e.g. electromagnetism) and at a much deeper level, things like String Theory, where the substrate of reality is topologically non-trivial.

4) I show that beneath a computationalist frame for consciousness there is an implicit conception of frames of reference that are real from specific “points of view”. But as I explain, it is not possible to bootstrap integrated states out of frames of reference or points of view. Ultimately, any non-trivial integration of information that is happening in these ontologies is a projection of your own mind (you’re borrowing the unity of your consciousness to put together pieces of information that define a frame of reference or point of view!).

And

5) How the mind uses phenomenal binding for information processing can be explained with the lens of self-organizing principles set up in such a way that “following the valence gradient will take you closer to a state that satisfies the constraints of the problem”. Meaning that the very style of problem solving our experience utilizes has an entirely different logic than classical digital algorithms. No wonder it’s so difficult to square our experience with a computationalist frame of reference!

To end, I encourage the listener to enrich his or her conception of computation to include irreducible integrated states as valid inputs, outputs, and intermediate states. This way we put on the same “computational class” things like quantum computers, non-linear optics, soap bubbles, and yes, DMT entity computing systems 🙂 They all use non-trivially integrated bound states as part of their information processing pipeline.

In aggregate, these points explain why the substrate matters for computation in a way that satisfactorily addresses one of the biggest concerns that there is with this view. Namely, Dancing Qualia leading to epiphenomenalism – which gets turned on its head with the Slicing Problem (turns out computational theories were the epiphenomenalist views all along), self-organizing principles for computation, hybrid computing systems, hardware accelerators, field topology, and the insight that “reality as a causal graph is question-begging”. Reality, is, instead, a network of bound states that can interact in topologically non-trivial ways.


Relevant links:

The View From My Topological Pocket: An Introduction to Field Topology for Solving the Boundary Problem

[Epistemic Status: informal and conversational, this piece provides an off-the-cuff discussion around the topological solution to the boundary problem. Please note that this isn’t intended to serve as a bulletproof argument; rather, it’s a guide through an intuitive explanation. While there might be errors, possibly even in reasoning, I believe they won’t fundamentally alter the overarching conceptual solution.]

This post is an informal and intuitive explanation for why we are looking into topology as a tentative solution to the phenomenal binding (or boundary) problem. In particular, this solutions identifies moments of experience with topological pockets of fields of physics. We recently published a paper where we dive deeper into this explanation space, and concretely hypothesize that the key macroscopic boundary between subjects of experience is the result of topological segmentation in the electromagnetic field (see explainer video / author’s presentation at the Active Inference Institute).

The short explanation for why this is promising is that topological boundaries are objective and frame-invariant features of “basement reality” that have causal effects and thus can be recruited by natural selection for information-processing tasks. If the fields of physics are fields of qualia, topological boundaries of the fields corresponding to phenomenal boundaries between subjects would be an elegant way for a theory of consciousness to “carve nature at its joints”. This solution is very significant if true, because it entails, among other things, that classical digital computers are incapable of creating causally significant experiences: the experiences that emerge out of them are by default something akin to mind dust, and at best, if significant binding happens, they are epiphenomenal from the “point of view” of the computation being realized.

The route to develop an intuition about this topic that this post takes is to deconstruct the idea of a “point of view” as a “natural kind” and instead advocate for topological pockets being the place where information can non-trivially aggregate. This idea, once seen, is hard to unsee; it reframes how we think about what systems are, and even the nature of information itself.


One of the beautiful things about life is that you sometimes have the opportunity to experience a reality plot twist. We might believe one narrative has always been unfolding, only to realize that the true story was different all along. As they say, the rug can be pulled from under your feet.

The QRI memeplex is full of these reality plot twists. You thought that the “plot” of the universe was a battle between good and evil? Well, it turns out it is the struggle between consciousness and replicators instead. Or that what you want is particular states of the environment? Well, it turns out you’ve been pursuing particular configurations of your world simulation all along. You thought that pleasure and pain follow a linear scale? Well, it turns out the scales are closer to logarithmic in nature, with the ends of the distribution being orders of magnitude more intense than the lower ends. I think that along these lines, grasping how “points of view” and “moments of experience” are connected requires a significant reframe of how you conceptualize reality. Let’s dig in!

One of the motivations for this post is that I recently had a wonderful chat with Nir Lahav, who last year published an article that steelmans the view that consciousness is relativistic (see one of his presentations). I will likely discuss his work in more detail in the future. Importantly, talking to him reminded me that ever since the foundation of QRI, we have taken for granted the view that consciousness is frame-invariant, and worked from there. It felt self-evident to us that if something depends on the frame of reference from which you see it, it doesn’t have inherent existence. Our experiences (in particular, each discrete moment of experience), have inherent existence, and thus cannot be frame-dependent. Every experience is self-intimating, self-disclosing, and absolute. So how could it depend on a frame of reference? Alas, I know this is a rather loaded way of putting it and risks confusing a lot of people (for one, Buddhists might retort that experience is inherently “interdependent” and has no inherent existence, to which I would replay “we are talking about different things here”). So I am motivated to present a more fleshed out, yet intuitive, explanation for why we should expect consciousness to be frame-invariant and how, in our view, our solution to the boundary problem is in fact up to this challenge.

The main idea here is to show how frames of reference cannot boostrap phenomenal binding. Indeed, “a point of view” that provides a frame of reference is more of a convenient abstraction that relies on us to bind, interpret, and coalesce pieces of information, than something with a solid ontological status that exists out there in the world. Rather, I will try to show how we are borrowing from our very own capacity for having unified information in order to put together the data that creates the construct of a “point of view”; importantly, this unity is not bootstrapped from other “points of view”, but draws from the texture of the fabric of reality itself. Namely, the field topology.


A scientific theory of consciousness must be able to explain the existence of consciousness, the nature and cause for the diverse array of qualia values and varieties (the palette problem), how consciousness is causally efficacious (avoid epiphenomenalism), and explain how the information content of each moment of experience is presented “all at once” (namely, the binding problem). I’ve talked extensively about these constraints in writings, videos, and interviews, but what I want to emphasize here is that these problems need to be addressed head on for a theory of consciousness to work at all. Keep these constraints in mind as we deconstruct the apparent solidity of frames of reference and the difficulty that arises in order to bootstrap causal and computational effects in connection to phenomenal binding out of a relativistic frame.

At a very high level, a fuzzy (but perhaps sufficient) intuition for what’s problematic when a theory of consciousness doesn’t seek frame-invariance is that you are trying to create something concrete with real and non-trivial causal effects and information content, out of fundamentally “fuzzy” parts.

In brief, ask yourself, can something fuzzy “observe” something fuzzy? How can fuzzyness be used to boostrap something non-fuzzy?

In a world of atoms and forces, “systems” or “things” or “objects” or “algorithms” or “experiences” or “computations” don’t exist intrinsically because there are no objective, frame-invariant, and causally significant ways to draw boundaries around them!

I hope to convince you that any sense of unity or coherence that you get from this picture of reality (a relativistic system with atoms and forces) is in fact a projection from your mind, that inhabits your mind, and is not out there in the world. You are looking at the system, and you are making connections between the parts, and indeed you are creating a hierarchy of interlocking gestalts to represent this entire conception of reality. But that is all in your mind! It’s a sort of map and territory confusion to believe that two fuzzy “systems” interacting with each other can somehow bootstrap a non-fuzzy ontological object (aka. a requirement for a moment of experience). 

I reckon that these vague explanations are in fact sufficient for some people to understand where I’m going. But some of you are probably clueless about what the problem is, and for good reason. This is never discussed in detail, and this is largely, I think, because people who think a lot about the problem don’t usually end up with a convincing solution. And in some cases, the result is that thinkers bite the bullet that there are only fuzzy patterns in reality.

How Many Fuzzy Computations Are There in a System?

Indeed, thinking of the universe as being made of particles and forces implies that computational processes are fuzzy (leaky, porous, open to interpretation, etc.). Now imagine thinking that *you* are one of such fuzzy computations. Having this as an unexamined background assumption gives rise to countless intractable paradoxes. The notion of a point of view, or a frame of reference, does not have real meaning here as the way to aggregate information doesn’t ultimately allow you to identify objective boundaries around packets of information (at least not boundaries that are more than merely-conventional in nature).

From this point of view (about points of view!), you realize that indeed there is no principled and objective way to find real individuals. You end up in the fuzzy world of fuzzy individuals of Brian Tomasik, as helpfully illustrated by this diagram:

Source: Fuzzy, Nested Minds Problematize Utilitarian Aggregation by Brian Tomasik

Brian Tomasik indeed identifies the problem of finding real boundaries between individuals as crucial for utilitarian calculations. And then, incredibly, also admits that his ontological frameworks gives him no principled way of doing so (cf. Michael E. Johnson’s Against Functionalism for a detailed response). Indeed, according to Brian (from the same essay):

Eric Schwitzgebel argues that “If Materialism Is True, the United States Is Probably Conscious“. But if the USA as a whole is conscious, how about each state? Each city? Each street? Each household? Each family? When a new government department is formed, does this create a new conscious entity? Do corporate mergers reduce the number of conscious entities? These seem like silly questions—and indeed, they are! But they arise when we try to individuate the world into separate, discrete minds. Ultimately, “we are all connected”, as they say. Individuation boundaries are artificial and don’t track anything ontologically or phenomenally fundamental (except maybe at the level of fundamental physical particles and structures). The distinction between an agent and its environment is just an edge that we draw around a clump of physics when it’s convenient to do so for certain purposes.

My own view is that every subsystem of the universe can be seen as conscious to some degree and in some way (functionalist panpsychism). In this case, the question of which systems count as individuals for aggregation becomes maximally problematic, since it seems we might need to count all the subsystems in the universe.”

Are you confused now? I hope so. Otherwise I’d worry about you.

Banana For Scale

A frame of reference is like a “banana for scale” but for both time and space. If you assume that the banana isn’t morphing, you can use how long it takes for waves emitted from different points in the banana to bounce back and return in order to infer the distance and location of physical objects around it. Your technologically equipped banana can play the role of a frame of reference in all but the most extreme of conditions (it probably won’t work as you approach a black hole, for very non-trivial reasons involving severe tidal forces, but it’ll work fine otherwise).

Now the question that I want to ask is: how does the banana “know itself”? Seriously, if you are using points in the banana as your frame of reference, you are, in fact, the one who is capable of interpreting the data coming from the banana to paint a picture of your environment. But the banana isn’t doing that. It is you! The banana is merely an instrument that takes measurements. Its unity is assumed rather than demonstrated. 


In fact, for the upper half of the banana to “comprehend” the shape of the other half (as well as its own), it must also rely on a presumed fixed frame of reference. However, it’s important to note that such information truly becomes meaningful only when interpreted by a human mind. In the realm of an atom-and-force-based ontology, the banana doesn’t precisely exist as a tangible entity. Your perception of it as a solid unit, providing direction and scale, is a practical assumption rather than an ontological certainty.

In fact, the moment we try to get a “frame of reference to know itself” you end up in an infinite regress, where smaller and smaller regions of the object are used as frames of reference to measure the rest. And yet, at no point does the information of these frames of reference “come together all at once”, except… of course… in your mind.

Are there ways to boostrap a *something* that aggregates and simultaneously expresses the information gathered across the banana (used as a frame of reference)? If you build a camera to take a snapshot of the, say, information displayed at each coordinate of the banana, the picture you take will have spatial extension and suffer from the same problem. If you think that the point at the aperture can itself capture all of the information at once, you will encounter two problems. If you are thinking of an idealized point-sized aperture, then we run into the problem that points don’t have parts, and therefore can’t contain multiple pieces of information at once. And if you are talking about a real, physical type of aperture, you will find that it cannot be smaller than the diffraction limit. So now you have the problem of how to integrate all of the information *across the whole area of the aperture* when it cannot shrink further without losing critical information. In either case, you still don’t have anything, anywhere, that is capable of simultaneously expressing all of the information of the frame of reference you chose. Namely, the coordinates you measure using a banana.

Let’s dig deeper. We are talking of a banana as a frame of reference. But what if we try to internalize the frame of reference. A lot of people like to think of themselves as the frame of reference that matters. But I ask you: what are your boundaries and how do the parts within those boundaries agree on what is happening?

Let’s say your brain is the frame of reference. Intuitively, one might feel like “this object is real to itself”. But here is where the magic comes. Make the effort to carefully trace how signals or measurements propagate in an object such as the brain. Is it fundamentally different than what happens with a banana? There might be more shortcuts (e.g. long axons) and the wiring could have complex geometry, but neither of these properties can ultimately express information “all at once”. The principle of uniformity says that every part of the universe follows the same universal physical laws. The brain is not an exception. In a way, the brain is itself a possible *expression* of the laws of physics. And in this way, it is no different than a banana.

Sorry, your brain is not going to be a better “ground” for your frame of reference than a banana. And that is because the same infinite recursion that happened with the banana when we tried to use it to ground our frame of reference into something concrete happens with your brain. And also, the same problem happens when we try to “take a snapshot of the state of the brain”, i.e. that the information also doesn’t aggregate in a natural way even in a high-resolution picture of the brain. It still has spatial extension and lacks objective boundaries of any causal significance.

Every single point in your brain has a different view. The universe won’t say “There is a brain here! A self-intimating self-defining object! It is a natural boundary to use to ground a frame of reference!” There is nobody to do that! Are you starting to feel the groundlessness? The bizarre feeling that, hey, there is no rational way to actually set a frame of reference without it falling apart into a gazillion different pieces, all of which have the exact same problem? I’ve been there. For years. But there is a way out. Sort of. Keep reading.

The question that should be bubbling up to the surface right now is: who, or what, is in charge of aggregating points of view? And the answer is: this does not exist and is impossible for it to exist if you start out in an ontology that has as the core building blocks relativistic particles and forces. There is no principled way to aggregate information across space and time that would result in the richness of simultaneous presentation of information that a typical human experience displays. If there is integration of information, and a sort of “all at once” presentation, the only kind of (principled) entity that this ontology would accept is the entire spacetime continuum as a gigantic object! But that’s not what we are. We are definite experiences with specific qualia and binding structures. We are not, as far as I can tell, the entire spacetime continuum all at once. (Or are we?).

If instead we focus on the fine structure of the field, we can look at mathematical features in it that would perhaps draw boundaries that are frame-invariant. Here is where a key insight becomes significant: the topology of a vector field is Lorentz invariant! Meaning, a Lorentz transformation will merely squeeze and sheer, but never change topology on its own. Ok, I admit I am not 100% sure that this holds for all of the topological features of the electromagnetic field (Creon Levit recently raised some interesting technical points that might make some EM topological features frame-dependent; I’ve yet to fully understand his argument but look forward to engaging with it). But what we are really pointing at is the explanation space. A moment ago we were desperate to find a way to ground, say, the reality of a banana in order to use it as a frame of reference. We saw that the banana conceptualized as a collection of atoms and forces does not have this capacity. But we didn’t inquire into other possible physical (though perhaps not *atomistic*) features of the banana. Perhaps, and this is sheer speculation, the potassium ions in the banana peel form a tight electromagnetic mesh that creates a protective Faraday cage for this delicious fruit. In that case, well, the boundaries of that protecting sheet would, interestingly, be frame invariant. A ground!

The 4th Dimension

There is a bit of a sleight of hand here, because I am not taking into account temporal depth, and so it is not entirely clear how large the banana, as a topological structure defined by the potassium ions protective sheer really is (again, this is totally made up! for illustration purposes only). The trick here is to realize that, at least in so far as experiences go, we also have a temporal boundary. Relativistically, there shouldn’t be a hard distinction between temporal and spatial boundaries of a topological pocket of the field. In practice, of course one will typically overwhelm the other, unless you approach the brain you are studying at close to the speed of light (not ideal laboratory conditions, I should add). In our paper, and for many years at QRI (iirc an insight by Michael Johnson in 2016 or so), we’ve talked about experiences having “temporal depth”. David Pearce posits that each fleeting macroscopic state of quantum coherence spanning the entire brain (the physical correlate of consciousness in his model) can last as little as a couple of femtoseconds. This does not seem to worry him: there is no reason why the contents of our experience would give us any explicit hint about our real temporal depth. I intuit that each moment of experience lasts much, much longer. I highly doubt that it can last longer than a hundred milliseconds, but I’m willing to entertain “pocket durations” of, say, a few dozens of milliseconds. Just long enough for 40hz gamma oscillations to bring disparate cortical micropockets into coherence, and importantly, topological union, and have this new new emergent object resonate (where waves bounce back and forth) and thus do wave computing worthwhile enough to pay the energetic cost of carefully modulating this binding operation. Now, this is the sort of “physical correlate of consciousness” I tend to entertain the most. Experiences are fleeting (but not vanishingly so) pockets of the field that come together for computational and causal purposes worthwhile enough to pay the price of making them.

An important clarification here is that now that we have this way of seeing frames of reference we can reconceptualize our previous confusion. We realize that simply labeling parts of reality with coordinates does not magically bring together the information content that can be obtained by integrating the signals read at each of those coordinates. But we suddenly have something that might be way better and more conceptually satisfying. Namely, literal topological objects with boundaries embedded in the spacetime continuum that contribute to the causal unfolding of the reality and are absolute in their existence. These are the objective and real frames of reference we’ve been looking for!

What’s So Special About Field Topology?

Two key points:

  1. Topology is frame-invariant
  2. Topology is causally significant

As already mentioned, the Lorentz Transform can squish and distort, but it doesn’t change topology. The topology of the field is absolute, not relativistic.

The Lorentz Transform can squish and distort, but it doesn’t change topology (image source).

And field topology is also causally significant. There are _many_ examples of this, but let me just mention a very startling one: magnetic reconnection. This happens when the magnetic field lines change how they are connected. I mention this example because when one hears about “topological changes to the fields of physics” one may get the impression that such a thing happens only in extremely carefully controlled situations and at minuscule scales. Similar to the concerns for why quantum coherence is unlikely to play a significant role in the brain, one can get the impression that “the scales are simply off”. Significant quantum coherence typically happens in extremely small distances, for very short periods of time, and involving very few particles at a time, and thus, the argument goes, quantum coherence must be largely inconsequential at scales that could plausibly matter for the brain. But the case of field topology isn’t so delicate. Magnetic reconnection, in particular, takes place at extremely large scales, involving enormous amount of matter and energy, with extremely consequential effects.

You know about solar flairs? Solar flairs are the strange phenomenon in the sun in which plasma is heated up to millions of degrees Kelvin and charged particles are accelerated to near the speed of light, leading to the emission of gigantic amounts of electromagnetic radiation, which in turn can ionize the lower levels of the Earth’s ionosphere, and thus disrupt radio communication (cf. radio blackouts). These extraordinary events are the result of the release of magnetic energy stored in the Sun’s corona via a topological change to the magnetic field! Namely, magnetic reconnection.

So here we have a real and tangible effect happening at a planetary (and stellar!) scale over the course of minutes to hours, involving enormous amounts of matter and energy, coming about from a non-trivial change to the topology of the fields of physics.

(example of magnetic reconnection; source)

Relatedly, coronal mass ejections (CMEs) also dependent on changes to the topology of the EM field. My layman understanding of CMEs is that they are caused by the build-up of magnetic stress in the sun’s atmosphere, which can be triggered by a variety of factors, including uneven spinning and plasma convection currents. When this stress becomes too great, it can cause the magnetic field to twist and trap plasma in solar filaments, which can then be released into interplanetary space through magnetic reconnection. These events are truly enormous in scope (trillions of kilograms of mass ejected) and speed (traveling at thousands of kilometers per second).

CME captured by NASA (source)

It’s worth noting that this process is quite complex/not fully understood, and new research findings continue to illuminate the details of this process. But the fact that topological effects are involved is well established. Here’s a video which I thought was… stellar. Personally, I think a program where people get familiar with the electromagnetic changes that happen in the sun by seeing them in simulations and with the sun visualized in many ways, might help us both predict better solar storms, and then also help people empathize with the sun (or the topological pockets that it harbors!).

The model showed differential rotation causes the sun’s magnetic fields to stretch and spread at different rates. The researchers demonstrated this constant process generates enough energy to form stealth coronal mass ejections over the course of roughly two weeks. The sun’s rotation increasingly stresses magnetic field lines over time, eventually warping them into a strained coil of energy. When enough tension builds, the coil expands and pinches off into a massive bubble of twisted magnetic fields — and without warning — the stealth coronal mass ejection quietly leaves the sun.” (source)

Solar flares and CMEs are just two rather spectacular macroscopic phenomena where field topology has non-trivial causal effects. But in fact there is a whole zoo of distinct non-trivial topological effects with causal implications, such as: how the topology of the Möbius strip can constrain optical resonant modes, twisted topological defects in nematic liquid crystal make some images impossible, the topology of eddy currents can be recruited for shock absorption aka. “magnetic breaking”, Meissner–Ochsenfeld effect and flux pinning enabling magnetic levitation, Skyrmion bundles having potential applications for storing information in spinotropic devices, and so on.

(source)

In brief, topological structures in the fields of physics can pave the way for us to identify the natural units that correspond to “moments of experience”. They are frame-invariant and casually significant, and as such they “carve nature at its joints” while being useful from the point of view of natural selection.

Can a Topological Pocket “Know Itself”?

Now the most interesting question arises. How does a topological pocket “know itself”? How can it act as a frame of reference for itself? How can it represent information about its environment if it does not have direct access to it? Well, this is in fact a very interesting area of research. Namely, how do you get the inside of a system with a clear and definite boundary to model its environment despite having only information accessible at its boundary and the resources contained within its boundary? This is a problem that evolution has dealt with for over a billion years (last time I checked). And fascinatingly, is also the subject of study of Active Inference and the Free Energy Principle, whose math, I believe, can be imported to the domain of *topological* boundaries in fields (cf. Markov Boundary).

Here is where qualia computing, attention and awareness, non-linear waves, self-organizing principles, and even optics become extremely relevant. Namely, we are talking about how the *interior shape* of a field could be used in the context of life. Of course the cell walls of even primitive cells are functionally (albeit perhaps not ontologically) a kind of objective and causally significant boundary where this applies. It is enormously adaptive for the cell to use its interior, somehow, to represent its environment (or at least relevant features thereof) in order to navigate, find food, avoid danger, and reproduce.

The situation becomes significantly more intricate when considering highly complex and “evolved” animals such as humans, which encompass numerous additional layers. A single moment of experience cannot be directly equated to a cell, as it does not function as a persistent topological boundary tasked with overseeing the replication of the entire organism. Instead, a moment of experience assumes a considerably more specific role. It acts as an exceptionally specialized topological niche within a vast network of transient, interconnected topological niches—often intricately nested and interwoven. Together, they form an immense structure equipped with the capability to replicate itself. Consequently, the Darwinian evolutionary dynamics of experiences operate on multiple levels. At the most fundamental level, experiences must be selected for their ability to competitively thrive in their immediate micro-environment. Simultaneously, at the broadest level, they must contribute valuable information processing functions that ultimately enhance the inclusive fitness of the entire organism. All the while, our experiences must seamlessly align and “fit well” across all the intermediary levels.

Visual metaphor for how myriad topological pockets in the brain could briefly fuse and become a single one, and then dissolve back into a multitude.

The way this is accomplished is by, in a way, “convincing the experience that it is the organism”. I know this sounds crazy. But ask yourself. Are you a person or an experience? Or neither? Think deeply about Empty Individualism and come back to this question. I reckon that you will find that when you identify with a moment of experience, it turns out that you are an experience *shaped* in the form of the necessary survival needs and reproductive opportunities that a very long-lived organism requires. The organism is fleetingly creating *you* for computational purposes. It’s weird, isn’t it?

The situation is complicated by the fact that it seems that the computational properties of topological pockets of qualia involve topological operations, such as fusion, fission, and the use of all kinds of internal boundaries. More so, the content of a particular experience leaves an imprint in the organism which can be picked up by the next experience. So what happens here is that when you pay really close attention, and you whisper to your mind, “who am I?”, the direct experiential answer will in fact be a slightly distorted version of the truth. And that is because you (a) are always changing and (b) can only use the shape of the previous experience(s) to fill the intentional content of your current experience. Hence, you cannot, at least not under normal circumstances, *really* turn awareness to itself and *be* a topological pocket that “knows itself”. For once, there is a finite speed of information propagation across the many topological pockets that ultimately feed to the central one. So, at any given point in time, there are regions of your experience of which you are *aware* but which you are not attending to.

This brings us to the special case. Can an experience be shaped in such a way that it attends to itself fully, rather than attend to parts of itself which contain information about the state of predecessor topological pockets? I don’t know, but I have a strong hunch that the answer is yes and that this is what a meditative cessation does. Namely, it is a particular configuration of the field where attention is perfectly, homogeneously, distributed throughout in such a way that absolutely nothing breaks the symmetry and the experience “knows itself fully” but lacks any room left to pass it on to the successor pockets. It is a bittersweet situation, really. But I also think that cessations, and indeed moments of very homogeneously distributed attention, are healing for the organism, and even, shall we say, for the soul. And that is because they are moments of complete relief from the discomfort of symmetry breaking of any sort. They teach you about how our world simulation is put together. And intellectually, they are especially fascinating because they may be the one special case in which the referent of an experience is exactly, directly, itself.

To be continued…


Acknowledgements

I am deeply grateful and extend my thanks to Chris Percy for his remarkable contributions and steadfast dedication to this field. His exceptional work has been instrumental in advancing QRI’s ideas within the academic realm. I also want to express my sincere appreciation to Michael Johnson and David Pearce for our enriching philosophical journey together. Our countless discussions on the causal properties of phenomenal binding and the temporal depth of experience have been truly illuminating. A special shout-out to Cube Flipper, Atai Barkai, Dan Girshovic, Nir Lahav, Creon Levit, and Bijan Fakhri for their recent insightful discussions and collaborative efforts in this area. Hunter, Maggie, Anders (RIP), and Marcin, for your exceptional help. Huge gratitude to our donors. And, of course, a big thank you to the vibrant “qualia community” for your unwavering support, kindness, and encouragement in pursuing this and other crucial research endeavors. Your love and care have been a constant source of motivation. Thank you so much!!!

Qualia Mastery II: Further Develop Your Toolkit for Navigating the State-Space of Consciousness

Explore Part II of the Qualia Mastery Series

Qualia Mastery, in a nutshell:

1) Explore the state-space of consciousness because you want to know it for yourself

2) Study it from many points of view because you want to understand it intellectually at a deep level

3) Intend to apply it for the benefit of all beings

In June of this year, we were proud to launch QRI’s first guided meditation series titled “Qualia Mastery.” Central to this series is the cultivation of a direct experiential understanding of how the mind works, coupled with an epistemological framework that values intellectual clarity. In essence, these guided meditations strive to provide both direct access to and intellectual insight into scientifically and personally significant states of consciousness. Furthermore, we embark on this journey with a sincere desire to serve and uplift others. The initial release features 9 foundational guided meditations. In this next installment, we’re collaborating with QRI associates Wystan Bryant-Scott and Roger Thisdell to go even deeper with another 9 meditations.

We genuinely hope you derive value from this series! We invite any feedback or phenomenological observations. Your perspective is invaluable to us.

Thank you!


Metta – Fabric Softener of Experience

Metta is a Pali word that can be translated as benevolence, friendliness, or good will. It is a key state of mind for meditative practice; it has the capacity to heal, invigorate, and center the mind.

The majority of guided Metta meditations emphasize the ways in which you can trigger this state of mind with semantic content and imagery. For example imagining a loved one, a pet, or even a beautiful scene, and tuning into the feeling of friendliness that such an image sparks.

In this meditation we instead emphasize the phenomenal character of Metta as a way to develop it, establish it, and understand it deeply. For example, we discuss how one can use different varieties of attention in order to kindle this feeling. We also tune into one’s intentions and background mood in order to nudge the mind towards Metta. More so, we carefully study how technical phenomenological features such as rhythm, wave envelope, and energy affect the quality and intensity of Metta.

May this meditation be of benefit to sentient beings!

Relevant Links:


Deeply Letting Go

It is often said that one of the most important meditative skills that one can cultivate is the practice of *letting go*. This means letting go of attachments, of cravings, of a sense of identity, and the need for things to be anything other than what they are. However, in practice doing this is more difficult than it sounds; we have a habit of holding tight to much more than we require for optimal wellbeing.

This guided meditation emphasizes two key aspects of letting go. Namely, (1) tactical methods for letting go, such as the judicious use of unusual varieties of attention, higher order equanimity, imaginal practices, and precise technique (such as rhythm and timing). And (2) the fact that letting go can be practiced in much deeper ways and with a much wider scope than is usually realized. In particular, letting go can take place in the visual, tactile, auditory domains, in addition to the spacious, cognitive, spiritual, and intuitive levels of the mind.

We conclude this meditation by listening to meditative music with the goal of experiencing it with complete equanimity and acceptance and putting our letting go techniques to practice.


Goldilocks Zone of Oneness

In this guided meditation, we delve into the phenomenology of various conceptions of personal identity. Specifically, we observe the experiential nuances of believing that we are individual souls (Closed Individualism), that we are a single universal consciousness (Open Individualism), that we represent ephemeral moments of experience (Empty Individualism), and that we encompass all these identities concurrently (Goldilocks Zone of Oneness).

As with the “The Phenomenology of Ontology” meditation, our objective here is to discern the qualities of experience that shape a specific worldview. In essence, the phenomenology of personal identity is a pivotal subject for any holistic consciousness research initiative, regardless of the metaphysical veracity of these perspectives. The capacity of these conceptions to modify experiential attributes—such as refining internal boundaries or amplifying the choppiness of sensations—underscores the importance of this topic for both phenomenological and scientific exploration.

More so, many exotic states of consciousness involve implicit alterations to our conceptions of personal identity. Therefore knowing how to detect the experiential features that make these beliefs feel more or less plausible is essential to successfully navigate exotic states of consciousness without compromising one’s epistemology.

Relevant Links:


Waves of Ever Becoming

In this meditation, Roger Thisdell guides us in a meditation of somatic scanning up and down the body using concurrent waves of awareness that pass through one another. We are trying to balance both the sense of grounding, stability with the sense of wakeful, levity.

By the end of the meditation, the goal is to isolate and metacognize the sense of ‘becoming’ within experience, and notice that this signal is always presenting itself. We may question, if everything seems like it’s always ‘becoming’ (but never fully become), then what significance does this have with the goal of trying to have ‘arrived’ somewhere?

For more guided meditations by Roger, check out his Patreon page where he releases a new guided meditation, on a variety of techniques, every week: https://www.patreon.com/rogerthis


Don’t Pay Attention

Normally in meditation we are focused on what IS in experience, but to be able to notice the absence of phenomena is key as well! Where there once were qualia, now there aren’t – what does that reveal to us about their nature?

Roger Thisdell guides a meditation starting with a taste session on the major ingredients which make up our experience. Then after paying attention to these components, we deliberately try to not pay attention to them. What we find is the move to let go of paying attention to anything is a universal move – no matter the object of attention – how convenient! 

The ability to take attention off of more and more aspects of experience is an essential skill which eventually culminates in the ability to not pay attention to time, space and consciousness, resulting in cessation.

For more guided meditations by Roger, check out his Patreon page where he releases a new guided meditation, on a variety of techniques, every week: https://www.patreon.com/rogerthis


Co-Arising Expansion and Contraction

Expansion and contraction are the subtlest distinguishing features of experience. This meditation on expansion and contraction, given by Roger Thisdell, is a guide for finding and synchronizing to the oscillatory nature of experience at different levels, and then realising the co-dependence on one another in order to exist. Where there is expansion there is contraction and vice versa. By having sufficient energy in the mind and being able to widen the ‘aperture’ of our present moment perception it is possible to notice contraction within attention, and expansion within awareness (and vice versa) at the same time!

For more guided meditations by Roger, check out his Patreon page where he releases a new guided meditation, on a variety of techniques, every week: https://www.patreon.com/rogerthis


A Clap of Thunder

In this guided meditation, our invited facilitator, Wystan, leads participants through meticulous body scanning techniques designed to cultivate an acute consciousness of the immediate present. Transitioning seamlessly from body scanning to methods of introspection, and further incorporating the nuanced technique of finger-following to “spread out the vision”, Wystan imparts a spectrum of methodologies that promise to augment the meditative practice of individuals across all levels of expertise.

For more content from Wystan Bryant-Scott, see his YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@wystantbs488/videos


Absorption Into Platonic Objects  

This meditation explores the phenomenology of absorption into Platonic objects. We delve into what it feels like to imagine, embody, and generate the sense of knowing of classic geometric and mathematical constructs.

One of the main takeaways from this meditation is that we can attune to the difference between (1) how we render a particular instance of a Platonic object and (2) the sense of knowing and existence of that object that arises as we do so.

That is, (1) emphasizes the specific point of view from which a Platonic object (say, a cube) can be apprehended. Each point of view gives rise to, in a way, a completely different experience (cf. Borges’ Funes the Memorious). Namely, the experience of rendering such an object from that particular point of view, with all of the sensory and qualitative features that come along with it. In contrast (2) points to that which remains the same across all of these points of view. Namely, the ways in which holding these objects in one’s attention keeps aspects of our experience invariant (such as the intuitions and resonances that come with each particular Platonic object).

In addition, we also explore how the geometry of attention affects one’s valence and sense of ease, with the goal of naturalizing “Sacred Geometry” for the cultivation of Qualia Mastery.

Relevant Links:


Self-Organizing Principles

There are many spiritual and yogic practices that utilize “elemental” objects of meditation. For example, the guided meditation by Michael Taft called “Five Elements Meditation” (link below) centers the mind around mental formations evocative of earth, water, fire, air, and space. 

Alas, it is natural to be skeptical of the value of these practices on the basis that science has shown that the universe is made up of particles, forces, and fields, and not the traditional elements of ancient ontologies.

Nevertheless, within the paradigm of Qualia Mastery in meditation, we affirm the significance of specific states of consciousness, irrespective of the techniques used to induce them. Adhering rigidly to a modern scientific worldview might, in fact, impede one’s engagement with such meditative practices. Engaging fully with a meditation that posits, for instance, fire as a fundamental entity, can often yield richer results when one genuinely subscribes to the idea. Continual internal rebuttals, such as “fire isn’t foundational; electrons are!” can inhibit deep immersion into these states.

So how can we rescue what is valuable from this style of meditation without having to buy into an implicit “elemental ontology”? Here is where the relevance of “self-organizing principles” comes into play. Namely, where we realize that the nervous system is capable of instantiating a cornucopia of diverse self-organizing principles that are used to render one’s inner world-simulation. Thus, when you imagine and embody “the element of fire” you are, in a way, instantiating a collection of self-organizing principles that roughly emulate the behavior of fire. 

Therefore, we can use a more generalized conception of “elemental meditation” as a window into these self-organizing principles. This is what this meditation does.

Relevant Links:

Candy Flipping Optimized: Why LSD + MDMA Points to Blissful Nondual Awareness and How to Maximize It

PLUS FOUR, n. (++++) A rare and precious transcendental state, which has been called a “peak experience,” a “religious experience,” “divine transformation,” a “state of Samadhi” and many other names in other cultures. It is not connected to the +1, +2, and +3 of the measuring of a drug’s intensity. It is a state of bliss, a participation mystique, a connectedness with both the interior and exterior universes, which has come about after the ingestion of a psychedelic drug, but which is not necessarily repeatable with a subsequent ingestion of that same drug. If a drug (or technique or process) were ever to be discovered which would consistently produce a plus four experience in all human beings, it is conceivable that it would signal the ultimate evolution, and perhaps the end, of the human experiment.

— Alexander Shulgin, PIHKAL, pages 963–965

In this post and accompanying video we provide a general “theory of candy flipping” that aims to explain why LSD + MDMA is so synergistic. What makes, say 200 micrograms of LSD and 150mg of MDMA so prone to be spiritual, psychologically healing, and loving? To get there, we address the following three/four questions:

  1. How do we improve research on candy flipping?
  2. How do we optimize candy flipping proper? And how do we generalize candy flipping for even better results?
  3. What would a general recipe for Shulgin’s ++++ be?

1- We go over current methodologies used to study candy flipping and why their results are limited (Straumann et al., 2023). Then we explain how a “think tank” approach (e.g. phenomenology club) allows us to create more phenomenologically grounded research paradigms (Gómez-Emilsson, 2021). By weighting in the personal experience of highly precise psychonauts with skills in areas like physics, math, visual art, and signal processing, we can arrive at mechanistic models such as those proposed by Steven Lehar in The Grand Illusion (Lehar, 2010) where MDMA causes your world simulation to vibrate in pleasant ways, which in turn “smooths out the rough edges” of the LSD state, or models involving algorithmic-level annealing dynamics (Gomez-Emilsson, 2016; Johnson, 2019; Gómez-Emilsson 2021, 2023). This kind of approach would add phase diagrams, wave mechanics, and nonlinear effects into the picture.

2- Optimizing candy flipping can be done by looking to generate the kind of synergy MDMA + LSD achieve in the best of conditions. Of note, trip reports involving low doses of each together with 2C-B and cannabis are discussed and analyzed. One needs to be mindful of annealing dynamics, drug effect arcs including how to handle the MDMA comedown, and pattern-focused readings of wave effects that for lack of a better metaphor could be catalogued as “qualia lensing“.

And

3- We hypothesize that the key ingredients to catalyze the blissful nondual awareness that comes from high-end candy flipping are (a) a full-spectrum energizer, (b) something that increases interconnectivity, and (c) a deeply relaxing agent. The combination of these three elements gives rise to a highly-nonlinear effect I call “FU§ION (Field Unification Search/Simplify in Invariant Optical Networks; to be fully unpacked at a later date), where all of the “resonant cavities” are fully relaxed, have a high degree of impedance matching between them, and are energized, so that they kick-start a “field harmonization” process that culminates in profound blissful nondual awareness. The energizer shouldn’t be narrow spectrum (like cocaine) and the relaxing agent shouldn’t be too blunting or non-Newtonian (like opioids). Examples of each:

a- LSD, DMT, Mescaline, Psilocybin, 2C-B, 2C-C, etc.
b- Cannabis/cannabinoids, 2C-B
c- MDMA, pregabalin, nitrous, ketamine, GHB

Combine one of each, carefully dosed, and according to this theory, you might get a ++++. (Please exercise caution when mixing substances – the rule of thumb is to not do it).

Note: 5-MeO-DMT might, in this model, be actually doing all three at once. It happens to be hitting receptors in the right combination for such a deep mystical “relaxed stimulation” to take hold. That said, it is possible that 5-MeO-DMT also has some rough edges, and that it can be further optimized (e.g. such as by combining it with nitrous). More research is needed 🙂


Example Formula: 15mg 2C-B, then an hour later 2g of GHB, and then an hour later DMT (100mg over the course of 2 hours) was reported as a ++++ by a trusted psychonaut recently (comparable in “depth” to 5-MeO-DMT). Please be careful – I am not encouraging anyone to try this. But if you do, or have done something similar, I’d be grateful if you let me know what happened. 🙂

Featured image by Cube Flipper.


References:

Lehar, S. (2010) The Grand Illusion. Excerpt “The Phenomenal Character of LSD + MDMA (Candy-Flipping) According to Cognitive Scientist Steve Lehar”. Retrieved from https://qualiacomputing.com/2018/12/12/the-phenomenal-character-of-lsd-mdma-candy-flipping-according-to-cognitive-scientist-steve-lehar/

Gomez-Emilsson, A. (2016) Peaceful Qualia: The Manhattan Project of Consciousness. Retrieved from https://qualiacomputing.com/2016/03/29/peaceful-qualia-the-manhattan-project-of-consciousness/

Johnson, M. (2019) Neural Annealing. Retrieved from https://opentheory.net/2019/11/neural-annealing-toward-a-neural-theory-of-everything/

Gómez-Emilsson, A. (2021) Healing Trauma With Neural Annealing. Retrieved from https://www.qri.org/blog/Neural-Annealing

Gómez-Emilsson, A. (2023), Neural Field Annealing and Psychedelic Thermodynamics presentation at PhilaDelic 2023. Retreieved from https://youtu.be/pM9k1I3VPOg

Straumann, I., Ley, L., Holze, F. et al. Acute effects of MDMA and LSD co-administration in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy participants. Neuropsychopharmacol. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01609-0